Perhaps even more insubstantial than my last post in this thread… last night a game of cricket between the Manchester Originals and the London Spirit as televised live.
Batting #1 for Manchester - Phil Salt
Batting #1 for London - Michael Pepper.
There was a famous piece of commentary on a cricket match with David Willey in the England team and Michael Holding in the West Indies team: And the bowler’s Holding, the batsman’s Willey
“Urban myth” is a popular term, but the more correct term is “urban legend,” as the people who study such things make a distinction between “myth” and “legend.” The story is a legend; the facts within the story are just untrue. No actual myths involved!
For people who don’t care about the distinction, just say “myth”—no need for “urban.”
This pedantry brought to you by your friendly neighborhood folklorist.
So the old record player you used wasn’t a changer like our family’s first one. Later we did get a changer (something like this one) that used an adapter.
TIL that Little Smokies can acquire a white chalklike substance on the surface while they are being cooked. It’s perfectly harmless, and in fact helps with preservation of the product. It’s a nontoxic (thank heavens!) mold.
Before Googling this, I was afraid I was going to have to pitch a package of them.
If you ever watch movie credits, one of the jobs often listed is a sound effects credit “foley artist.” It is named after a sound effects pioneer Jack Foley (1891-1967).
No, it was my mom’s when she was a teenager (50s). It was probably considered “portable”. It did have a handle on it! It was box shaped with a lid that clasped closed. Maybe at one time it had the attachment that would fit over the spindle for 45s - is that what you mean by “changer”?. But it wasn’t around by the time we were playing with it. We had a modern stereo in the house that had a changer. But it was mostly used for albums. I remember at the time, needles were expensive (or so we were told!) and my parents didn’t want us playing old scratched up 45s on it.
A changer would have a 5" tall spindle with a little sort of finger 4" up: when the tone arm reached the center groove, it would return to its resting spot, the spindle finger would be tripped, causing the next record to drop, and the tone arm would move onto the lead groove.
Typically, a changer could hold as many as 5 or 6 records on the spindle, and play through all of them in order, but audiophiles would not use them because of the distortion caused by the stylus angle being skewed by record stack height. I only remember LP-changer spindles, but may have seen pictures of 45 changers.