# "Ten Ways Obama Could Reduce Gas Prices Now"

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ten-ways-obama-could-reduce-gas-prices-now/614310>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [February 29, 2012, 3:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ten-ways-obama-could-reduce-gas-prices-now/614310 "2012-02-29T03:07:11Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NotreDame05](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/90ced4/32.png) [@NotreDame05](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/NotreDame05)\
**Post date:** [March 1, 2012, 2:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ten-ways-obama-could-reduce-gas-prices-now/614310/41 "2012-03-01T14:53:24Z")

</div>

> [@Doubticus](#):
>
> No, the link doesn’t deal with speculation specifically, but rather how the appearance of scarcity cause panic and panic pushes the markets beyond the bounds of common sense. A similar mechanism is at work in the case of oil.

If so, then the rising price would not be the result of speculation, would it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NotreDame05](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/90ced4/32.png) [@NotreDame05](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/NotreDame05)\
**Post date:** [March 1, 2012, 2:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ten-ways-obama-could-reduce-gas-prices-now/614310/42 "2012-03-01T14:56:13Z")

</div>

> [@puddleglum](#):
>
> Gasoline has a very low price elasticity in the short run, this means that small changes in supply make a disproportionately large increase in price. Because of this even though the president has only a small say in how much gasoline there is, even that small say if done right can make an noticeable impact on retail prices.  
> Much of the price run up is due to the effect of speculators driving up prices in anticipation of conflict between Iran and Israel. Due to the magic of oil futures, anticipated price increases in the future mean that prices go up now. The upside to this is that if lower prices are anticipated for the future prices will go down now. Committing the US government to allowing use of all of America’s energy sources would mean freeing up billions of dollars in oil and another energy sources to be used over the next decade. Knowing that America was committed to pumping as much oil as it could would cause anticipation of lower prices for oil and cause lower oil prices now. Since much of the run up in the price of gas is due to speculation anticipated lower prices in the future would send speculators running for the exits, desperate to get out of oil. Because of this announcing a new policy of energy development now would drop the price much more than at almost any other time.  
> The number 3 point refers to a particular talking point amoung a certain brand of politician that we need to stop tax breaks for big oil. By this they mean certain types of depreciation and overseas income tax breaks which are available for American companies.

The evidence does not suggest speculation as the significant or primary cause for the increased price of oil. This is not to assert speculation plays no role in the price increase. Rather, speculations contribution is minimal or minor compared to other factors influencing the price and the evidence suggests those other factors are causing the price increase.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LonesomePolecat](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/a88e57/32.png) [@LonesomePolecat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LonesomePolecat)\
**Post date:** [March 1, 2012, 3:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ten-ways-obama-could-reduce-gas-prices-now/614310/43 "2012-03-01T15:12:06Z")

</div>

> [@Askance](#):
>
> Not one of these would reduce petrol prices “now”, if by that is meant, say, early 2012.
> 
> Me, I think gas prices are too low; the higher the better for alternative fuels.

People who are having to decide between buying food and buying fuel to get to work probably don’t agree with you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LonesomePolecat](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/a88e57/32.png) [@LonesomePolecat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LonesomePolecat)\
**Post date:** [March 1, 2012, 3:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ten-ways-obama-could-reduce-gas-prices-now/614310/44 "2012-03-01T15:23:15Z")

</div>

> [@curioushat](#):
>
> What amazes me most is that this may literally become an actual campaign issue. Gas prices. As if whether it costs 50$ **(3.84)** or, _gasp_ 55$ **(4.23!!!)** to fill your gas tank every week means anything.
> 
> How about, will I lose my 6 figure salary? Will I lose $50,000 from my investment portfolio?

How much will it take out of my food budget if I’m making $12 an hour? Or are you suffering from the delusion that most American households have six figure incomes?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LonesomePolecat](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/a88e57/32.png) [@LonesomePolecat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LonesomePolecat)\
**Post date:** [March 1, 2012, 3:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ten-ways-obama-could-reduce-gas-prices-now/614310/45 "2012-03-01T15:28:24Z")

</div>

> [@Doubticus](#):
>
> I think gas prices are at their current levels because of unregulated speculation. A similar thing happened to rice in 2008. [How Fear Drove World Rice Markets Insane : The Salt : NPR](http://www.npr.org/blogs/thesalt/2011/11/02/141771712/how-fear-drove-world-rice-markets-insane)

That may very well be a factor, but I think all the saber rattling by Israel and Iron is probably the most important factor at this time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![No\_Wikipedia\_Cites](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/94ad74/32.png) [@No\_Wikipedia\_Cites](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/No_Wikipedia_Cites)\
**Post date:** [March 1, 2012, 3:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ten-ways-obama-could-reduce-gas-prices-now/614310/46 "2012-03-01T15:42:41Z")

</div>

> [@curioushat](#):
>
> What amazes me most is that this may literally become an actual campaign issue. Gas prices. As if whether it costs 50$ **(3.84)** or, _gasp_ 55$ **(4.23!!!)** to fill your gas tank every week means anything.

A penny here, a penny there, and pretty soon it adds up to real money. Every nickle counts!

> [@](#):
>
> **Oh, don’t poo-poo a nickel, Lisa. A nickel will buy you a steak and kidney pie, a cup of coffee, a slice of cheesecake and a newsreel, with enough change left over to ride from Battery Park to the Polo Grounds**

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hentor\_the\_Barbarian](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/8edcca/32.png) [@Hentor\_the\_Barbarian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hentor_the_Barbarian)\
**Post date:** [March 1, 2012, 4:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ten-ways-obama-could-reduce-gas-prices-now/614310/47 "2012-03-01T16:59:05Z")

</div>

Well, since the US became a net exporter of oil last year, Obama could step in to curtail that, increasing the domestic supply available. Conservatives wouldn’t object to that, right?

What has worked in the past to reduce gas prices at the pump has been to hold congressional hearings on the elimination of government subsidies to the industry. Conservatives would be in favor of that, right?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [March 1, 2012, 5:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ten-ways-obama-could-reduce-gas-prices-now/614310/48 "2012-03-01T17:41:28Z")

</div>

[Middle manager](http://www.humanevents.com/search.php?author_name=Steve+Maley) thinks he can fix everything that’s wrong with his industry, or make the president do it. Yeah, sure.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![erislover](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/71e660/32.png) [@erislover](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/erislover)\
**Post date:** [March 1, 2012, 5:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ten-ways-obama-could-reduce-gas-prices-now/614310/49 "2012-03-01T17:54:30Z")

</div>

Gas prices have yet to impact me, because I have always made decisions which minimize the impact gas has on me. I have, since I was 18, lived close to where I worked, walked/biked/bussed to local businesses, and probably some other things which impact my use but which I cannot imagine off the top of my head. I am not prepared to accept adjusting national policy yet again to subsidize even further people who want to work in Boston but live in New Hampshire.

Of course fuel prices do affect the cost of goods in general, but I have confidence that the conservatives are correct that the pricing mechanism of the market will handle that just fine.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [March 1, 2012, 6:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ten-ways-obama-could-reduce-gas-prices-now/614310/50 "2012-03-01T18:05:01Z")

</div>

Most of these are things that Obama is already doing, and which no Republican would touch with a ten-foot pole.

_1) Commit to a strategic goal of North American energy security._  
Absolutely. And the only way we can possibly do this is by replacing oil products (which we don’t have much of, and the people who do have much of tend to not like us very much) with something else.

_2) Ditch the anti-industry, anti-capitalist rhetoric._  
Opposition to cap-and-trade is nothing but anti-capitalist rhetoric. It’s simple free-market economics: You want to use the air, you pay for the air.

_3) Stop targeting the oil industry for punitive tax treatment._  
There’s no specific targeting going on. The closest thing that’s happening to this is the Republicans trying to target low rates on the companies, to punish the rest of us.

_4) Realize that Uncle Sam is in the energy business and is a partner in industry’s success._  
Again, Obama is the only candidate who realizes that the government needs to be actively pushing research into new technologies.

_5) Recognize that industry does not need to be led by government; industry needs to be unleashed and encouraged to innovate._  
Like, by government funding research so industry can innovate in alternate energy. Right on.

_6) Trust that no oil operator wants to be the “next BP”._  
If they want that, then let’s help them, by imposing new regulations that will make it harder to be the next BP.

_7) Return offshore permitting to the pre-Macondo pace._  
The first bad idea of the lot. This is a direct contradiction of point 6.

_8) Declare hydraulic fracturing & well design to be the regulatory domain of the states, not the EPA._  
OK, another bad idea, and probably unconstitutional: Gas beds cross state lines, and therefore state regulation of them is impossible.

_9) Rescind the recently-enacted royalty rate increase for new onshore Federal oil and gas leases._  
OK, I don’t know anything about this, so I won’t comment here.

_10) Encourage development of a nationwide distribution system of natural gas as a transportation fuel._  
Well, at least on the right track, but natural gas, while better than oil in some key ways, still isn’t all that great a fuel. Better to focus on electric vehicles, but I suppose I’ll take what I can get.

_11) Get real about the promise of alternative fuels._  
The reality about them is that we’re going to need them, preferably sooner rather than later. Which even this guy recognized, just one bullet point previously.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gorsnak](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gorsnak/32/7587_2.png) [@Gorsnak](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gorsnak)\
**Post date:** [March 2, 2012, 3:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ten-ways-obama-could-reduce-gas-prices-now/614310/51 "2012-03-02T03:01:38Z")

</div>

> [@Hentor\_the\_Barbarian](#):
>
> Well, since the US became a net exporter of oil last year…

I really hope I’m being whooshed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![XT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/xt/32/456_2.png) [@XT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/XT)\
**Post date:** [March 2, 2012, 3:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ten-ways-obama-could-reduce-gas-prices-now/614310/52 "2012-03-02T03:18:51Z")

</div>

He probably meant petroleum based products…like refined gasoline. We are, afaik, a net exporter of that sort of stuff, mainly because, having huge refineries we don’t import refined fuels, and we do export them. That would be my guess as to what Hentor meant, anyway, FWIW.

-XT

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gorsnak](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gorsnak/32/7587_2.png) [@Gorsnak](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gorsnak)\
**Post date:** [March 2, 2012, 3:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ten-ways-obama-could-reduce-gas-prices-now/614310/53 "2012-03-02T03:30:15Z")

</div>

> [@xtisme](#):
>
> He probably meant petroleum based products…like refined gasoline. We are, afaik, a net exporter of that sort of stuff, mainly because, having huge refineries we don’t import refined fuels, and we do export them. That would be my guess as to what Hentor meant, anyway, FWIW.
> 
> -XT

Well, maybe, but of course exporting gasoline to Canada and Mexico isn’t really relevant to the market price of gas when the crude it was refined from came from…Canada and Mexico. Stop selling us gas and we’ll build more of our own refineries. Besides, restricting export of gas would run afoul of NAFTA, which is what gives you guaranteed access to that crude in the first place. So I’m still hoping it was a whoosh.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![XT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/xt/32/456_2.png) [@XT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/XT)\
**Post date:** [March 2, 2012, 3:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ten-ways-obama-could-reduce-gas-prices-now/614310/54 "2012-03-02T03:38:27Z")

</div>

I agree. Like I said, that’s my guess. Based on the fact that there is another new thread on this misconception in GD, I’d say it’s a good guess as to what he meant…or, perhaps his own misconception of the issue.

-XT

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Una\_Persson](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/una_persson/32/346_2.png) [@Una\_Persson](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Una_Persson)\
**Post date:** [March 2, 2012, 8:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ten-ways-obama-could-reduce-gas-prices-now/614310/55 "2012-03-02T20:37:46Z")

</div>

Each day I wish vainly that folks would not bother to listen to nobodies from nowhere with no real academic or research credentials who are “popular” just because they have a blog. I don’t know why I would listen to anything this guy says more than any random person on the street.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Voyager](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/voyager/32/133_2.png) [@Voyager](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Voyager)\
**Post date:** [March 2, 2012, 9:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ten-ways-obama-could-reduce-gas-prices-now/614310/56 "2012-03-02T21:17:48Z")

</div>

> [@Una\_Persson](#):
>
> Each day I wish vainly that folks would not bother to listen to nobodies from nowhere with no real academic or research credentials who are “popular” just because they have a blog. I don’t know why I would listen to anything this guy says more than any random person on the street.

Blogs aren’t worth the paper they are written on.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![erislover](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/71e660/32.png) [@erislover](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/erislover)\
**Post date:** [March 2, 2012, 9:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ten-ways-obama-could-reduce-gas-prices-now/614310/57 "2012-03-02T21:21:02Z")

</div>

> [@Una\_Persson](#):
>
> I don’t know why I would listen to anything this guy says more than any random person on the street.

You know, too, the problem with journalists’ reporting… they majored _in journalism_.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LonghornDave](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/a87d85/32.png) [@LonghornDave](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LonghornDave)\
**Post date:** [March 2, 2012, 9:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ten-ways-obama-could-reduce-gas-prices-now/614310/58 "2012-03-02T21:23:38Z")

</div>

> [@Ludovic](#):
>
> 1. Declare hydraulic fracturing & well design to be the regulatory domain of the states, not the EPA.
> 
> Would do nothing in the short/medium term for _gasoline_ prices. We already burn little oil for raw energy in this country, fracking does not help us drill for oil, and natural gas prices are already at a rock bottom. Which isn’t to say I have made up my mind on how to regulate it, just that it wouldn’t help gasoline prices in the short/medium term.

What in the world are you talking about? Fracking does not help us drill for oil? Are you crazy? We’ve been using hydraulic fracturing for oil wells for a long time. Have you perhaps heard of the state of North Dakota?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LonghornDave](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/a87d85/32.png) [@LonghornDave](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LonghornDave)\
**Post date:** [March 2, 2012, 9:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ten-ways-obama-could-reduce-gas-prices-now/614310/59 "2012-03-02T21:30:49Z")

</div>

> [@Smapti](#):
>
> Aren’t #4 and #5 mutually incompatible?
> 
> I don’t see how you can simultaneously “make Uncle Sam a partner in the energy business” and “set the industry free from the government”.

Presumably the U.S. is a partner in the energy business because it receives taxes and royalties from the energy industry. Presumably setting the industry free from the government is code for reducing regulations. Voila, they can now be done simultaneously.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LonghornDave](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/a87d85/32.png) [@LonghornDave](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LonghornDave)\
**Post date:** [March 2, 2012, 9:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ten-ways-obama-could-reduce-gas-prices-now/614310/60 "2012-03-02T21:32:29Z")

</div>

> [@Voyager](#):
>
> And if they did this, the companies would complain that having to comply with 50 different rules increases costs. The benefit to gas companies from this would be in avoiding regulations in states where they have the influence to cripple oversight.

Actually, this is exactly how the industry is primarily regulated and has been since it’s beginning over 100 years ago. You probably haven’t heard a lot of complaining about it since it seems to have worked fairly well.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ten-ways-obama-could-reduce-gas-prices-now/614310.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ten-ways-obama-could-reduce-gas-prices-now/614310.md?page=4)
