# Terrorism thread

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/terrorism-thread/760269>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [July 19, 2016, 12:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/terrorism-thread/760269 "2016-07-19T00:02:54Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![El\_Kabong](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/el_kabong/32/496_2.png) [@El\_Kabong](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/El_Kabong)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2016, 5:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/terrorism-thread/760269/21 "2016-07-19T17:44:29Z")

</div>

> [@levdrakon](#):
>
> [Syria conflict: Rebels 'filmed beheading boy' in Aleppo - BBC News](http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-36835678)
> 
> US-backed “moderate” Syrian rebels torment and behead a young Palestinian boy.
> 
> Does this count as terrorism, or just Tuesday in Islam?

Forget it, Jake, it’s Syria.

Seriously, though, if you believe this killing was due to ‘Islam’, could you identify where in the article this is explained? I couldn’t find it.

Terrorism it indeed seems to be, but of the kind practiced by poorly-organized militias. I’m not seeing the religious component.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Buck\_Godot](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/buck_godot/32/6573_2.png) [@Buck\_Godot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Buck_Godot)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2016, 5:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/terrorism-thread/760269/22 "2016-07-19T17:46:18Z")

</div>

> [@levdrakon](#):
>
> The “Islamic attack of the day” thread should probably be started in the Pit. The “Stupid Republican idea of the day” thread is there, right?
> 
> Islamic attacks are so frequent we’re constantly starting new threads for them. We should have a daily thread for it.

Can we blame all of the attacks in Britain in the 70s-90s on Christian terrorists?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![levdrakon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/49beb7/32.png) [@levdrakon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/levdrakon)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2016, 6:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/terrorism-thread/760269/23 "2016-07-19T18:09:21Z")

</div>

> [@El\_Kabong](#):
>
> Forget it, Jake, it’s Syria.
> 
> Seriously, though, if you believe this killing was due to ‘Islam’, could you identify where in the article this is explained? I couldn’t find it.
> 
> Terrorism it indeed seems to be, but of the kind practiced by poorly-organized militias. I’m not seeing the religious component.

Yeah, before I posted I was afraid the group’s name might translate to “Liberal Democrats for Atheism” or something so I googled the group and its affiliations and did some reading.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Memnon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f1d935/32.png) [@Memnon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Memnon)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2016, 6:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/terrorism-thread/760269/24 "2016-07-19T18:09:48Z")

</div>

> [@Buck\_Godot](#):
>
> Can we blame all of the attacks in Britain in the 70s-90s on Christian terrorists?

It depends. If the terrorists were quoting chapter and verse, and their theology was easily defensible, given the actual content of Christian Scriptures, as is the case with groups like Al-Qaeda and ISIS and Islamic scriptures, then yes. Absolutely.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2016, 6:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/terrorism-thread/760269/25 "2016-07-19T18:17:07Z")

</div>

“Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.”

- Matthew 10:34

He said to them, "But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one.

Luke 22:36

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Memnon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f1d935/32.png) [@Memnon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Memnon)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2016, 6:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/terrorism-thread/760269/26 "2016-07-19T18:23:01Z")

</div>

> [@elucidator](#):
>
> “Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.”
> 
> - Matthew 10:34
> 
> He said to them, "But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one.
> 
> Luke 22:36

Your point being?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![levdrakon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/49beb7/32.png) [@levdrakon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/levdrakon)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2016, 6:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/terrorism-thread/760269/27 "2016-07-19T18:27:13Z")

</div>

> [@Buck\_Godot](#):
>
> Can we blame all of the attacks in Britain in the 70s-90s on Christian terrorists?

You can if you want. I mostly remember hearing about the IRA and Sinn Fein. Something about one side being mostly Catholic and the other side Protestant or something, but I don’t recall people running around saying “convert or die” or anything. The parties involved were Christian, but that didn’t seem to be the point. I imagine there’s a difference between a terrorist who happens to be Christian and a Christian terrorist. What do you think?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2016, 6:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/terrorism-thread/760269/28 "2016-07-19T18:42:41Z")

</div>

> [@Tithonus](#):
>
> Your point being?

For every criticism of Islam there is an equal, but not opposite, criticism of Christianity. I think it’s some sort of natural law are something.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Memnon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f1d935/32.png) [@Memnon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Memnon)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2016, 6:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/terrorism-thread/760269/29 "2016-07-19T18:45:38Z")

</div>

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> For every criticism of Islam there is an equal, but not opposite, criticism of Christianity. I think it’s some sort of natural law are something.

It’s certainly an SDMB law.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NeonMadman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/58f4c7/32.png) [@NeonMadman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/NeonMadman)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2016, 8:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/terrorism-thread/760269/30 "2016-07-19T20:27:39Z")

</div>

> [@Euphonious\_Polemic](#):
>
> Those never happened. Liberal propaganda.
> 
> And McVeigh was a secret Muslim.

And McVeigh happened 21 years ago. How far back do you have to go to find examples of Islamic terrorism? 21 hours, maybe?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wolf333](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wolf333/32/3460_2.png) [@Wolf333](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Wolf333)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2016, 9:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/terrorism-thread/760269/31 "2016-07-19T21:39:41Z")

</div>

> [@levdrakon](#):
>
> What definition of terrorism are you using?

If it was done by a Muslim, it’s terrorism.

If it was done by a non-Muslim, it was just a lone crazy (even if there was a group of them).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Trinopus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/2bfe46/32.png) [@Trinopus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Trinopus)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2016, 10:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/terrorism-thread/760269/32 "2016-07-19T22:34:37Z")

</div>

> [@Alessan](#):
>
> So you’re saying they aren’t war crimes?

Well, not all war crimes are terrorism. (Not all terrorist acts are war crimes. If one jackass with a gun shoots up a nightclub, it isn’t “war” at all, just a crime.)

The definition I favor is that a terrorist act is an intentional crime against civilians having a focused political basis. If someone is mentally disturbed and violent, there is no actual political basis.

I leave out such things as the London Blitz or the fire-bombing of Tokyo, as these were formal acts of war, and not ordinary crimes trying to puff themselves up as political statements.

The U.S. drone program may embrace war crimes (I don’t agree, but I won’t reject the notion as self-contradictory) but I can’t see how it could possibly be counted as “terrorism.” It has sufficient “fig-leaf” legitimacy in the targeting of “enemy combatants.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DinoR](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dinor/32/2821_2.png) [@DinoR](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DinoR)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2016, 11:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/terrorism-thread/760269/33 "2016-07-19T23:11:02Z")

</div>

Since definitions came up it might be useful to look at the FBI’s [definition](http://www.nij.gov/topics/crime/terrorism/pages/welcome.aspx).

> [@](#):
>
> The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) defines terrorism as “the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.”

Not every attempted or successful mass killing is necessarily terrorism. A mass shooting by an disgruntled worker that targets his boss and coworkers would be an example. Not every terror attack necessarily includes an attempt to kill. The long running ALF/ELF (Animal Liberation Front / Earth Liberation Front) bombing campaign in the US would be an example of terror attacks that focus on property.

The [National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism](https://www.start.umd.edu/) (aka START for some reason…maybe from pronouncing STRT?!?) hosted by University of Maryland is probably of interest. It’s an interesting site for those who want to get passed the typical journalist demonstration of the Dunning-Kruger effect. They [recently](https://www.start.umd.edu/news/2015-global-terrorism-database-now-available) finished updating the Global Terror Database to include 2015’s data.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![adaher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@adaher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/adaher)\
**Post date:** [July 20, 2016, 6:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/terrorism-thread/760269/34 "2016-07-20T06:44:38Z")

</div>

> [@Euphonious\_Polemic](#):
>
> Those never happened. Liberal propaganda.
> 
> And McVeigh was a secret Muslim.

Actually, Richard Clarke said in his book that Al Qaeda may actually have had a role in the OKC bombing:

> **[Did the Oklahoma bomber have help from al-Qa'ida's explosives expert?](https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/did-the-oklahoma-bomber-have-help-from-alqa-ida-s-explosives-expert-567794.html)**
>
> Richard Clarke's book 
> Against All Enemies has not just pushed the Bush administration deep on to the defensive over its approach to terrorism. It also pokes a stick into another hornet's nest by asking whether the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing was not...

> [@](#):
>
> Nobody, least of all Mr Clarke, is suggesting that al-Qa’ida carried out the bombing, which was pinned primarily on Timothy McVeigh, with help from his old army buddy Terry Nichols. But his book stirs up some troubling unanswered questions about Mr Nichols’ many trips to the Philippines in the years preceding the bombing and raises the possibility that he received explosives training from Ramzi Yousef, the mastermind behind the first World Trade Centre bombing in 1993.
> 
> Mr Clarke notes that both Yousef and Nichols were in Cebu City, a hotbed of activity by the radical Filipino group Abu Sayyaf, on the same days, and that Nichols continued to make phone calls to Cebu for some time afterwards.
> 
> “Could the al-Qa’ida explosives expert have been introduced to the angry American who proclaimed his hatred for the US government?” Mr Clarke writes. “We do not know, despite some FBI investigation. We do know that Nichols’s bombs did not work before his Philippine stay and were deadly when he returned.”

For those with short memories, Richard Clarke is the furthest thing from a crank.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![madmonk28](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/madmonk28/32/20811_2.png) [@madmonk28](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/madmonk28)\
**Post date:** [July 20, 2016, 12:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/terrorism-thread/760269/35 "2016-07-20T12:44:31Z")

</div>

> [@Trinopus](#):
>
> …  
> The U.S. drone program may embrace war crimes (I don’t agree, but I won’t reject the notion as self-contradictory) but I can’t see how it could possibly be counted as “terrorism.” It has sufficient “fig-leaf” legitimacy in the targeting of “enemy combatants.”

The drone program so infrequently hits its stated target that one must conclude that they really aren’t all that concerned about hitting those targets. The program is a terror campaign to force a civilian population to reject the idea of providing any support to our enemies so that the terror bombing from the sky might one day stop. It is a war crime and it is terrorism. Americans like our terror tied up in nice packaging so we can pretend it doesn’t exist. If a guy blows up a bus for 72 virgins? Terrorist. If he blows up a wedding so that he can go to college on the GI bill? Thank you for your service.

People here who want to talk about the violent nature of Islam need to look in the fucking mirror and ask themselves how many people have to die so they can live their vacuous life style.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stranger\_On\_A\_Train](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/13edae/32.png) [@Stranger\_On\_A\_Train](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stranger_On_A_Train)\
**Post date:** [July 20, 2016, 1:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/terrorism-thread/760269/36 "2016-07-20T13:40:45Z")

</div>

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> For every criticism of Islam there is an equal, but not opposite, criticism of Christianity. I think it’s some sort of natural law are something.

To be fair, the Christians got kind of fatigued by the whole European Wars of Religion which managed to kill off somewhere between 5 and 16 million people, not counting the Scottish and English Reformations and the English Conquest of Ireland and all of the fallout coming from that, and then of course the Crusades, which were largely an exercise in reinforcing feudualism, opening trade routes in the Mediterranean, and getting rid of excess sons who might otherwise pose a danger of trying to usurp the line of succession. Islam as a whole is still trying to catch up to the collective Christain churches in death toll and destruction despite numerous invasions, various civil conflicts, and the campaigns of Suleiman the Magnificent; but what they lack in the basic competence of warfare and organizational administration they make up for with enthusiasm.

As for drone strikes, they can’t be said to be war crimes per se, nor do they exactly qualify as terorrism in intent (although they are in effect), but they fall into a new class of largely ill-advised and generally ineffectial means of conducting warfare which is as transparent as motor oil and almost completely lacking in culpability of error for all authorties and actors involved. There is little evidence that drone strikes have been effective as a counterterrorism and counterinsurgency measure, [a position even stated by the US Army War College Strategic Studies Institute](http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pdffiles/pub1167.pdf).

Stranger

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [July 20, 2016, 2:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/terrorism-thread/760269/37 "2016-07-20T14:01:36Z")

</div>

> [@Stranger\_On\_A\_Train](#):
>
> As for drone strikes, they can’t be said to be war crimes per se, nor do they exactly qualify as terorrism in intent (although they are in effect), but they fall into a new class of largely ill-advised and generally ineffectial means of conducting warfare which is as transparent as motor oil and almost completely lacking in culpability of error for all authorties and actors involved. There is little evidence that drone strikes have been effective as a counterterrorism and counterinsurgency measure, [a position even stated by the US Army War College Strategic Studies Institute](http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pdffiles/pub1167.pdf).
> 
> Stranger

Yes, they are a whole new kettle of fish, and I, too, question whether they do more harm than good. Calling “bad things I don’t like” either terrorism or a war crime isn’t productive in discourse, though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nava](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/da6949/32.png) [@Nava](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nava)\
**Post date:** [July 20, 2016, 2:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/terrorism-thread/760269/38 "2016-07-20T14:46:22Z")

</div>

> [@levdrakon](#):
>
> You can if you want. I mostly remember hearing about the IRA and Sinn Fein. Something about one side being mostly Catholic and the other side Protestant or something, but I don’t recall people running around saying “convert or die” or anything. The parties involved were Christian, but that didn’t seem to be the point. I imagine there’s a difference between a terrorist who happens to be Christian and a Christian terrorist. What do you think?

Are you under the notion that IRA and Sinn Fein are the two sides? It’s not clear from your post. You do seem to have missed the whole socio-historical-religious background to the whole issue, though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![levdrakon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/49beb7/32.png) [@levdrakon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/levdrakon)\
**Post date:** [July 20, 2016, 3:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/terrorism-thread/760269/39 "2016-07-20T15:01:29Z")

</div>

> [@Nava](#):
>
> Are you under the notion that IRA and Sinn Fein are the two sides? It’s not clear from your post. You do seem to have missed the whole socio-historical-religious background to the whole issue, though.

No, I’m not but feel free to hunt strawmen and engage in thinly veiled ad hominems.

Do you think “all of the attacks in Britain in the 70s-90s” was Christian terrorism? Make your case.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![levdrakon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/49beb7/32.png) [@levdrakon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/levdrakon)\
**Post date:** [July 20, 2016, 3:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/terrorism-thread/760269/40 "2016-07-20T15:09:51Z")

</div>

**Nava** , aren’t you the local Spanish expert or something? Would you describe Basque terrorism as Christian terrorism or Witch terrorism or something else? I understand the Basque are Roman Catholic with a history of witchcraft.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/terrorism-thread/760269.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/terrorism-thread/760269.md?page=3)
