# Tesla Model 3 anticipation thread

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tesla-model-3-anticipation-thread/792478>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [July 31, 2017, 4:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tesla-model-3-anticipation-thread/792478 "2017-07-31T04:19:10Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 14

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr.Strangelove](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dr.strangelove/32/6613_2.png) [@Dr.Strangelove](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr.Strangelove)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2017, 2:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tesla-model-3-anticipation-thread/792478/261 "2017-11-17T02:55:27Z")

</div>

> [@SamuelA](#):
>
> with 500 amps of current.

1500 amps.

The motor controller isn’t repairable by “civilians”. Fortunately, though, it’s easily replaced as a unit. I dunno if Tesla will consider selling those parts to third parties.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Magiver](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/4491bb/32.png) [@Magiver](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Magiver)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2017, 3:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tesla-model-3-anticipation-thread/792478/262 "2017-11-17T03:19:18Z")

</div>

> [@jz78817](#):
>
> what, exactly, is the “electrical control module?” because modern cars have lots of those. the last bus query I did on a Lincoln Continental showed it had 40.

the module that controls the electrical power to the motors.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Niply\_Elder](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/8e8cbc/32.png) [@The\_Niply\_Elder](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Niply_Elder)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2017, 5:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tesla-model-3-anticipation-thread/792478/263 "2017-11-17T05:31:52Z")

</div>

ok new Semis and Roadster, damn.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr.Strangelove](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dr.strangelove/32/6613_2.png) [@Dr.Strangelove](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr.Strangelove)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2017, 6:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tesla-model-3-anticipation-thread/792478/264 "2017-11-17T06:26:01Z")

</div>

That was a pretty awesome presentation.

Semi:  
500 mile range  
0-60 in 5 seconds unloaded  
0-60 in 20 s with 80k lb load  
65 mph up 5% grade fully loaded  
400 mile charge in 30 min  
Lots of other goodies, like anti-jackknife torque vectoring and platooning.

Obviously, the unloaded 0-60 time is silly, but I think the loaded time is a serious benefit to both safety and courtesy. With CA onramps at least, trucks have a hard time merging safely into traffic due to their low acceleration.

Roadster:  
0-60 in 1.9 s  
0-100 in 4.2 s  
1/4 mi in 8.9 s  
250+ mph  
620 mi range  
200 kW-h battery

Looks fantastic, too. Only $250k to preorder…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr.Strangelove](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dr.strangelove/32/6613_2.png) [@Dr.Strangelove](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr.Strangelove)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2017, 6:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tesla-model-3-anticipation-thread/792478/265 "2017-11-17T06:29:11Z")

</div>

Pics and stuff:  
[Semi](https://www.tesla.com/semi/)  
[Roadster](https://www.tesla.com/roadster/)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jz78817](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jz78817/32/1028_2.png) [@jz78817](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jz78817)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2017, 10:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tesla-model-3-anticipation-thread/792478/266 "2017-11-17T10:21:01Z")

</div>

> [@SamuelA](#):
>
> He means the drive unit motor control module. The thing that converts from high voltage DC at about 400 volts and supplies a 3 phase AC waveform to the drive unit, with 500 amps of current. Each channel uses dozens of silicon carbide mosfets, the whole thing is water cooled, etc. _Very_difficult, virtually impossible to make a knockoff that meets any reasonable level of quality for safety standards at these power levels.

#1 I don’t need it explained to me as if I were a child, I know how these things work

#2 Magiver’s concern is misplaced because every HEV/PHEV/EV has the same hardware and they’re not failing left and right

edit: Oh, you can “reserve” the Roadster for $50,000, or the “founders series” for $250,000? Sounds like Tesla needs another interest-free loan.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jz78817](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jz78817/32/1028_2.png) [@jz78817](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jz78817)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2017, 10:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tesla-model-3-anticipation-thread/792478/267 "2017-11-17T10:31:12Z")

</div>

and I’m not the only one who thinks this is a sneaky way to raise capital:

> **[All The Questions Tesla Has To Answer Now](https://jalopnik.com/all-the-questions-tesla-has-to-answer-now-1820523237)**
>
> Tesla introduced a new show-stopper on Thursday in the form of a colossal big-rig electric semi. It’s carrying hugely impressive specs, too. But what Tesla CEO Elon Musk offered up on Thursday was nothing short of a high-flying reveal party for a...

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ravenman](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ravenman/32/2929_2.png) [@Ravenman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ravenman)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2017, 11:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tesla-model-3-anticipation-thread/792478/268 "2017-11-17T11:18:11Z")

</div>

> [@jz78817](#):
>
> edit: Oh, you can “reserve” the Roadster for $50,000, or the “founders series” for $250,000? Sounds like Tesla needs another interest-free loan.

At those prices, the size of the loan might total… one MEEELLION dollars!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jz78817](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jz78817/32/1028_2.png) [@jz78817](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jz78817)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2017, 11:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tesla-model-3-anticipation-thread/792478/269 "2017-11-17T11:34:08Z")

</div>

> [@Ravenman](#):
>
> At those prices, the size of the loan might total… one MEEELLION dollars!

[check your math.](https://twitter.com/neilcybart/status/931395361041772545)

“If I’m reading this correctly, 1,000 “founders” reservations at $250,000 a pop. That’s basically a $250M capital raise for Tesla.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ravenman](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ravenman/32/2929_2.png) [@Ravenman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ravenman)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2017, 12:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tesla-model-3-anticipation-thread/792478/270 "2017-11-17T12:00:44Z")

</div>

That’s 1,000 reservations available, not 1,000 reservations made.

Maybe you’re right and there’s a bunch of suckers who will want this car… when it delivers in seven years or whatever.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SamuelA](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/c77e96/32.png) [@SamuelA](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SamuelA)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2017, 1:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tesla-model-3-anticipation-thread/792478/271 "2017-11-17T13:25:50Z")

</div>

> [@Dr.Strangelove](#):
>
> 1500 amps.
> 
> The motor controller isn’t repairable by “civilians”. Fortunately, though, it’s easily replaced as a unit. I dunno if Tesla will consider selling those parts to third parties.

Where is your 1500 amp figure coming from?

I was calculating it as : 258 horsepower from model 3 drive motor. (from an EPA document)

745 watts per horsepower. 400 volts pack voltage. 258\*745/400 = 480 amps.

Fun fact, in the industry I’m in, we’ve noticed a shortage of silicon carbide mosfets. To get 480 amps you need around 10-15 50-amp FETS per channel, which is around what people have found when tearing down model S motor controllers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jz78817](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jz78817/32/1028_2.png) [@jz78817](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jz78817)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2017, 2:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tesla-model-3-anticipation-thread/792478/272 "2017-11-17T14:14:11Z")

</div>

> [@SamuelA](#):
>
> Where is your 1500 amp figure coming from?
> 
> I was calculating it as : 258 horsepower from model 3 drive motor. (from an EPA document)
> 
> 745 watts per horsepower. 400 volts pack voltage. 258\*745/400 = 480 amps.
> 
> Fun fact, in the industry I’m in, we’ve noticed a shortage of silicon carbide mosfets. To get 480 amps you need around 10-15 50-amp FETS per channel, which is around what people have found when tearing down model S motor controllers.

the Model S/Model X “P” variants.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr.Strangelove](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dr.strangelove/32/6613_2.png) [@Dr.Strangelove](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr.Strangelove)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2017, 3:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tesla-model-3-anticipation-thread/792478/273 "2017-11-17T15:45:59Z")

</div>

> [@jz78817](#):
>
> the Model S/Model X “P” variants.

Right. I thought we were talking more generally about Tesla at that point. Tesla made a big deal of their 3D printed contactor rated at 1500 A.

In any case, the numbers presented are only valid in the power-limited case. At zero RPM, the current (for a finite power draw) can be arbitrarily high, limited only by the resistance of the circuit (including cell resistance), and potentially by cooling

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr.Strangelove](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dr.strangelove/32/6613_2.png) [@Dr.Strangelove](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr.Strangelove)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2017, 3:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tesla-model-3-anticipation-thread/792478/274 "2017-11-17T15:58:43Z")

</div>

> [@jz78817](#):
>
> and I’m not the only one who thinks this is a sneaky way to raise capital:
> 
> [All The Questions Tesla Has To Answer Now](https://jalopnik.com/all-the-questions-tesla-has-to-answer-now-1820523237)

Oh look, another Ryan Felton article. What a surprise.

While I’m sure Tesla is happy to take people’s money, it’s not like $250M is going to make or break things. It’s small potatoes. The point of the Roadster is not to make money (though it shouldn’t lose money), but rather be a halo item. It’s there to continue demonstrating that EVs can be superior to ICEs not just in efficiency but in virtually every way that matters.

As best I can tell, Tesla built a hell of a motor for the Model 3 and now they’re using it for everything. The Roadster has three of them; the Semi has four; the AWD Model 3 will have two. So all of this extra stuff is, in part, a way of further amortizing Model 3 development costs.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSeid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dseid/32/20194_2.png) [@DSeid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSeid)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2017, 4:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tesla-model-3-anticipation-thread/792478/275 "2017-11-17T16:39:50Z")

</div>

How much utility does a semi with 300 miles of range have? Even 500? And batteries that size take a while to charge.

Delivery trucks with defined routes routes and batteries that can recharge between running routes as they are reloaded … that makes sense. A semi?

Seems to me that Tesla needs to focus more on executing their current project well before moving on to the next big idea.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr.Strangelove](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dr.strangelove/32/6613_2.png) [@Dr.Strangelove](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr.Strangelove)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2017, 4:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tesla-model-3-anticipation-thread/792478/276 "2017-11-17T16:54:47Z")

</div>

> [@DSeid](#):
>
> Seems to me that Tesla needs to focus more on executing their current project well before moving on to the next big idea.

Model 3 development is done. Now they’re working on production. Semi production is a ways off, but they need to develop it now if they want to be ready a few years from now. Development and production are different people; you can’t just arbitrarily move resources between them (though apparently they did temporarily steal some people on the semi project to help rewrite the pack assembly automation).

The semi will recharge 400 miles in 30 min. Refueling diesel tanks apparently takes 15 minutes, so this is hardly a difference at all.

One could argue that Tesla should have focused on shorter, local routes, but those are probably lower margin than long haul.

I think it’s in Tesla’s interest to find as many uses for their batteries as possible. Increased demand means more production at the Gigafactory, which means lower prices for everyone. Along with utility storage, the semi should be a big user–somewhere around 1000 kW-h per unit.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jz78817](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jz78817/32/1028_2.png) [@jz78817](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jz78817)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2017, 5:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tesla-model-3-anticipation-thread/792478/277 "2017-11-17T17:02:45Z")

</div>

> [@Dr.Strangelove](#):
>
> Oh look, another Ryan Felton article. What a surprise.

ad hominem. what’s wrong with his analysis? That is, apart from not being complimentary enough towards Tesla.

> [@DSeid](#):
>
> How much utility does a semi with 300 miles of range have? Even 500? And batteries that size take a while to charge.

for long haul? Dubious, but we’ll wait and see. Long haul competitors like the Freightliner Cascadia and Kenworth T680 can carry 300+ gallons of diesel, and at roughly 8 mpg that’s 2400 miles total range per fill. I believe the limit for truck drivers is 11 consecutive on-road hours, so hauling something cross country at 65 mph gets you ~ 700 ish miles before the driver is legally required to stop for rest. The Tesla would already be tapped out. at least for a while, this doesn’t look like something an owner-operator would take a chance on.

> [@](#):
>
> Delivery trucks with defined routes routes and batteries that can recharge between running routes as they are reloaded … that makes sense. A semi?

that would make more sense, for a company-owned fleet with company-employed drivers (e.g. Wal\*Mart, Meijer, etc.) The tractors are pretty much interchangeable, so drivers could make their deliveries, leave the tractor for recharging, and hop into a fully-charged one to take back to the warehouse. FCA does this with their regional inter-facility fleet except they run on CNG. Just roll trucks among drivers as they’re fueled (on site) as available.

> [@](#):
>
> Seems to me that Tesla needs to focus more on executing their current project well before moving on to the next big idea.

well, yes; it’s rather strange to announce something like this while you’re still scrambling putting Model 3s together with chewing gum and baling wire.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jz78817](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jz78817/32/1028_2.png) [@jz78817](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jz78817)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2017, 5:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tesla-model-3-anticipation-thread/792478/278 "2017-11-17T17:15:19Z")

</div>

> [@Dr.Strangelove](#):
>
> Model 3 development is done. Now they’re working on production. Semi production is a ways off, but they need to develop it now if they want to be ready a few years from now. Development and production are different people; you can’t just arbitrarily move resources between them (though apparently they did temporarily steal some people on the semi project to help rewrite the pack assembly automation).

your vehicle operations team should be involved in the design process from the start. you don’t wait until you have a finished design then fire it over to manufacturing and say “here you go, design the assembly line.” That work _should_ have been nearly done back in March 2016 when they unveiled the first Model 3 prototypes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr.Strangelove](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dr.strangelove/32/6613_2.png) [@Dr.Strangelove](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr.Strangelove)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2017, 5:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tesla-model-3-anticipation-thread/792478/279 "2017-11-17T17:20:29Z")

</div>

> [@jz78817](#):
>
> ad hominem. what’s wrong with his analysis? That is, apart from not being complimentary enough towards Tesla.

There’s nothing wrong because there is no analysis. Again, if Tesla is losing a billion per quarter, then how is $250M capital raise supposed to be significant? It’s 3 weeks of burn rate. Ryan thinks that Tesla went through all the effort of building several prototype vehicles just to sustain the company for 3 more weeks? Not to mention that they’re been talking about both of these things for several years now, so somehow they predicted back in 2014 or whatever that they would need 3 weeks of extra cash here in 2017, so they better get started soon.

It’s all just ridiculous, conspiracy-level thinking.

As for the rest of the article, I’m not sure if he even watched the presentation. 0-60 times are fun to watch but the real point is that it comes for free when you have the power to maintain speed on significant grades. And that would well be important to truckers on many routes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr.Strangelove](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dr.strangelove/32/6613_2.png) [@Dr.Strangelove](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr.Strangelove)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2017, 5:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tesla-model-3-anticipation-thread/792478/280 "2017-11-17T17:27:51Z")

</div>

> [@jz78817](#):
>
> your vehicle operations team should be involved in the design process from the start. you don’t wait until you have a finished design then fire it over to manufacturing and say “here you go, design the assembly line.”

Sure, but the involvement will be small early on. It doesn’t take the entire production team to point out the ways that the design needs to be modified to be manufacturable. Whatever production issues are left to be solved on the Model 3 aren’t going to be affected by semi development at this stage.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tesla-model-3-anticipation-thread/792478.md?page=13)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tesla-model-3-anticipation-thread/792478.md?page=15)
