# Tetrahedral Pyramid

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tetrahedral-pyramid/1016608>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [April 4, 2025, 12:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tetrahedral-pyramid/1016608 "2025-04-04T12:08:35Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sunacres](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/4491bb/32.png) [@sunacres](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sunacres)\
**Post date:** [April 4, 2025, 11:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tetrahedral-pyramid/1016608/21 "2025-04-04T23:56:31Z")

</div>

I worked with a guy who catalogued all of the geometric ratios used by early stonemasons (like, 10th and 11th centuries), and it would be pretty far-fetched for me to believe most of them weren’t understood back in Greek and Egyptian cultures.

He (John James) published a booklet called “The Ratio Hunter” and if you’re into that sort of thing any given page will simply blow your mind.

For example  
[![Imgur](https://i.imgur.com/LNqNEel.png "imgur.com") ](https://imgur.com/LNqNEel)

I got to spend a summer with him at Chartres and by golly he demonstrated how many of these were used to lay out tiny details in the stonework.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2025, 12:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tetrahedral-pyramid/1016608/22 "2025-04-05T00:09:36Z")

</div>

The glass atrium of the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame (designed by the same architect as the Louvre pyramid) is (mostly) triangular-based, if you want a modern example.

[![](https://pcfandtypecodewebstuff.s3.amazonaws.com/images/Nk5L-1.ext.TimothyHursley.8704_E10_10.max-1600x1600.jpg) ](https://pcfandtypecodewebstuff.s3.amazonaws.com/images/Nk5L-1.ext.TimothyHursley.8704_E10_10.max-1600x1600.jpg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lumpy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lumpy/32/446_2.png) [@Lumpy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lumpy)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2025, 12:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tetrahedral-pyramid/1016608/23 "2025-04-05T00:38:11Z")

</div>

I think that the regular tetrahedron is far more interesting as a physical object if it is something in one piece that you can pick up and turn around. We know from the ancient device of [caltrops](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caltrop) that this configuration was long understood. But a large pile of stone blocks is another matter; the 3D-ness of the symmetry is more incidental, one face always being invisible and fixed to the ground.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![beowulff](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/beowulff/32/542_2.png) [@beowulff](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/beowulff)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2025, 12:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tetrahedral-pyramid/1016608/24 "2025-04-05T00:44:13Z")

</div>

They exist in SciFi:  
(first couple of seconds):

> **[Laura Returns Home | Men In Black II | Voyage](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMDMKplWWXc%2F)**
>
> Laura (Rosario Dawson) learns that she is the light of Zartha and must return home to save her planet and Earth.#MenInBlack #WillSmith #TommyLeeJonesMen in B...

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bob\_2](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bob_2/32/3341_2.png) [@bob\_2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bob_2)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2025, 8:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tetrahedral-pyramid/1016608/25 "2025-04-05T08:19:18Z")

</div>

> [@Pleonast](#):
>
> I think the wider question is if any ancient cultures used triangles or hexagons. It’s quite possible, since the geometry is straightforward. It is those hypothetical cultures that would’ve built tetrahedral pyramids.

Tesselation, using square and other regular shapes of tiles was used as far back as 4000 BC.

The Sumerians used clay tiles to compose decoration features in their homes and temples. From there, tessellation found its place in the art of many civilizations, from the Egyptians, Persians, Romans and Greeks to the Byzantines, Arabs, the Japanese, Chinese and the Moors, so it’s reasonable to assume that the Egyptions were familiar with triangles and hexagons at least.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lumpy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lumpy/32/446_2.png) [@Lumpy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lumpy)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2025, 4:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tetrahedral-pyramid/1016608/26 "2025-04-05T16:05:19Z")

</div>

They would have loved this:

[![](https://uploads1.wikiart.org/images/m-c-escher/horseman-1.jpg) ](https://uploads1.wikiart.org/images/m-c-escher/horseman-1.jpg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RickJay](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/bb73d2/32.png) [@RickJay](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RickJay)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2025, 4:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tetrahedral-pyramid/1016608/27 "2025-04-05T16:23:23Z")

</div>

> [@CalMeacham](#):
>
> In particular, why aren’t there any tetrahedral pyramids, with triangular horizontal cross-sections?

Four sided pyramids are much easier.

I honestly think it’s that simple.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TriPolar](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tripolar/32/3008_2.png) [@TriPolar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TriPolar)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2025, 5:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tetrahedral-pyramid/1016608/28 "2025-04-05T17:14:50Z")

</div>

I think that’s a lot of it. Aside from that, if we’re talking about the very large pyramids most of us are familiar with, as viewed by people at the time they were built, a 3-sided and 4-sided pyramid look the same unless you’re standing on top of it or from some higher vantage point.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LSLGuy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lslguy/32/5813_2.png) [@LSLGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LSLGuy)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2025, 7:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tetrahedral-pyramid/1016608/29 "2025-04-05T19:49:11Z")

</div>

> [@Lumpy](#):
>
> They would have loved this:

The King sure would have.

I bet the stonemasons would have shit a brick if they’d seen that drawing. “Oh no!, we gotta make a jillion of those, from 4 separate materials. I quit; I’d rather shovel out stables.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lumpy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lumpy/32/446_2.png) [@Lumpy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lumpy)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2025, 8:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tetrahedral-pyramid/1016608/30 "2025-04-05T20:34:49Z")

</div>

I was thinking more clay tiles, definitely easier to mass-produce with molds.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LSLGuy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lslguy/32/5813_2.png) [@LSLGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LSLGuy)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2025, 8:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tetrahedral-pyramid/1016608/31 "2025-04-05T20:58:29Z")

</div>

In other words, they’d shit bricks all day. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![md-2000](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/9d8465/32.png) [@md-2000](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/md-2000)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2025, 10:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tetrahedral-pyramid/1016608/32 "2025-04-06T22:20:03Z")

</div>

> [@RickJay](#):
>
> Four sided pyramids are much easier.
> 
> I honestly think it’s that simple.

I assume this too. Cutting squared pieces is probably simplest. Otherwise, they’re cutting prism pieces with flat tops, or else stacking becomes an interesting nightmare. Everyone everywhere seems to work with rectangular blocks.

You can see the original pyramid, the Step Pyramid at Saquarra. Originally, the graves of the early Egyptian nobility were brick rectagular buildings built of mud brick. Imhotep (architect) made the original _mastaba_ for Djoser (pharoah) the standard rectangular shape, then extended it to square and added more, smaller square constructs on top to form the steps of the first pyramid. There’s interesting studies on how the construction was extended, piece by piece, to end up with the final result. So, rectangular to square. Not much of a leap.

Later pharoahs copied and refined the idea. The Giza pyramids used much larger blocks, rather than the small-ish limestone blocks of the step pyramid; when you’re working in volume, why do extra stonework? They also conceived of covering the outside with smoothed limestone (vsible remnants near the top of the middle pyramid in Giza.)

Later, when the Old Kingdom was in decline and resources were less plentiful, they tried things like filling the interior with rubble instead of solid blocks. Yo can see the result in the Black Puramid, near the Bent Pyramid. All that’s left is a central core and a pile of rubble, like several lesser pyramids from the time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CalMeacham](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/calmeacham/32/35_2.png) [@CalMeacham](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CalMeacham)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2025, 12:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tetrahedral-pyramid/1016608/33 "2025-04-07T00:46:25Z")

</div>

It occurred to me that there was at least one triangular structure with (I believe) an equilateral triangle cross-section – The **Trylon** , one half of the iconic symbol of the 1939 World’s Fair (the other half being the **Perisphere** ).

Of course, it’s not at all what I had in mind – it was an incredibly tall “pylon” (“Trylon” is supposed to come from “TRiangular pYLON”), with its height far exceeding any of the sides. But at least it’s the right sort of shape.

> **[Trylon and Perisphere](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trylon_and_Perisphere)**
>
> The Trylon and Perisphere were two monumental modernistic structures designed by architects Wallace Harrison and J. Andre Fouilhoux that were together known as the Theme Center of the 1939 New York World's Fair at Flushing Meadows–Corona Park in Queens, New York City, United States. The Perisphere was a tremendous sphere, 180 feet (55 m) in diameter, connected to the 610-foot (190 m) spire-shaped Trylon by what was at the time the world's longest escalator. The Perisphere housed a diorama by Henr...

> **[Reddit - The heart of the internet](https://www.reddit.com/r/Lost_Architecture/comments/kcp5vq/the_trylon_and_perisphere_centerpieces_of_the/?rdt=58358)**

Edited to add: Evidently the name “Trylon” has come to mean a three-sided pylon, even it it wasn’t at the 1939 World’s Fair. There’s a company that manufactures them today, but I have no idea where any might be.

chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/[https://trylon.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Trylon-US\_Stock\_Tower\_Catalog.pdf](https://trylon.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Trylon-US_Stock_Tower_Catalog.pdf)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LSLGuy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lslguy/32/5813_2.png) [@LSLGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LSLGuy)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2025, 2:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tetrahedral-pyramid/1016608/34 "2025-04-07T14:38:07Z")

</div>

They are pretty common as masts for radio antennas. A lot of cellular towers are trylons. IME they’re more common in flat rural areas where you want more height to get more range, and there are no existing buildings to hang antennas on.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CalMeacham](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/calmeacham/32/35_2.png) [@CalMeacham](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CalMeacham)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2025, 5:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tetrahedral-pyramid/1016608/35 "2025-04-07T17:11:24Z")

</div>

When I was back in Boy Scouts and trying to get my Pioneering merit badge (along with a bunch of other guys in my troop, at summer camp) we found ourselves running out of time when we were building a signal tower. It was all long poles lashed together. We made a command decision and decided that it would be a _three_-sided signal tower, instead of a four-sided one.

Necessity and a truncated schedule is the mother of invention.

I wonder if that’s how they came up with the idea for a “trylon”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Saint\_Cad](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/saint_cad/32/18907_2.png) [@Saint\_Cad](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Saint_Cad)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2025, 7:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tetrahedral-pyramid/1016608/36 "2025-04-07T19:16:47Z")

</div>

> [@MikeS](#):
>
> The ancient Egyptians knew that a triangle with side lengths of 3, 4, and 5 had a right angle, so they could use that knowledge to make cuts at 90° to each other with a high degree of precision. I don’t think that they had the same level of knowledge they’d need to construct the 60° or 120° angles needed for triangular or hexagonal blocks to the same degree of precision.

1-1-1 triangle does the trick.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrDibble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mrdibble/32/114_2.png) [@MrDibble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrDibble)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2025, 9:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tetrahedral-pyramid/1016608/37 "2025-04-08T09:32:16Z")

</div>

> [@CalMeacham](#):
>
> why aren’t there any tetrahedral pyramids, with triangular horizontal cross-sections?

Tetrahedrons make sense for compression structures like masts or signal towers. They have no advantage for mass gravity structures like pyramids, and involve extra work in design and build. What would be the point?

> [@CalMeacham](#):
>
> You’d expect there to be some natural eroded tetrahedral-shaped structures

Why? Erosive forces tend to be either uni- or bi-directional, they would not tend to produce tetrahedrons unless there was a _particularly_ strong ground fabric favouring that. And while joint systems with 60° dihedral angles are common enough, the nature of jointing would favour lozenges not triangles. You can get triangular conjugate joints but they tend to be small-scale and not affect regional fabric enough to influence large-scale landform shape.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CalMeacham](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/calmeacham/32/35_2.png) [@CalMeacham](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CalMeacham)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2025, 11:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tetrahedral-pyramid/1016608/38 "2025-04-08T11:40:29Z")

</div>

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> Tetrahedrons make sense for compression structures like masts or signal towers. They have no advantage for mass gravity structures like pyramids, and involve extra work in design and build. What would be the point?

I have no idea what you mean here. Squat tetrahedra would be “mass gravity” structures just as a four-sided pyramid. Or a five-sided pyramid (which even Martians can build). There’s absolutely no reason you couldn’t build a stable three-sided pyramid, as long as its height was consistent with engineering stability.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CalMeacham](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/calmeacham/32/35_2.png) [@CalMeacham](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CalMeacham)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2025, 12:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tetrahedral-pyramid/1016608/39 "2025-04-08T12:07:44Z")

</div>

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> Why? Erosive forces tend to be either uni- or bi-directional, they would not tend to produce tetrahedrons unless there was a _particularly_ strong ground fabric favouring that. And while joint systems with 60° dihedral angles are common enough, the nature of jointing would favour lozenges not triangles. You can get triangular conjugate joints but they tend to be small-scale and not affect regional fabric enough to influence large-scale landform shape.

Glacial Horns (AKA Pyramidal peaks) form when three or more glaciers diverge from a single point. If there are three, you get a three-sided peak from natural erosion forces

> [@](#):
>
> When three or more of these cirques converge on a central point, they create a pyramid-shaped peak with steep walls. These horns are a common shape for mountain tops in highly glaciated areas. The number of faces of a horn depends on the number of cirques involved in the formation of the peak: three to four is most common. Horns with more than four faces include the [Weissmies](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weissmies) and the [Mönch](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C3%B6nch).[[1]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyramidal_peak#cite_note-embleton-1) A peak with four symmetrical faces is called a _Matterhorn_ (after the [Matterhorn](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matterhorn), a mountain in the Alps).[[2]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyramidal_peak#cite_note-2)

> **[Pyramidal peak](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyramidal_peak)**
>
> A pyramidal peak, sometimes called a glacial horn in extreme cases, is an angular, sharply pointed mountain peak which results from the cirque erosion due to multiple glaciers diverging from a central point. Pyramidal peaks are often examples of nunataks.
> Glaciers, typically forming in drainages on the sides of a mountain, develop bowl-shaped basins called cirques (sometimes called 'corries' – from Scottish Gaelic coire \[kʰəɾə\] (a bowl) – or cwms). Cirque glaciers have rotational sliding that ...

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CalMeacham](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/calmeacham/32/35_2.png) [@CalMeacham](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CalMeacham)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2025, 12:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tetrahedral-pyramid/1016608/40 "2025-04-08T12:38:37Z")

</div>

Mont Ventoux on the Tour de France and Triple Divide Peak in Montana (which sends water falling on it into three different watersheds, and ultimately, three different oceans) are examples of three-sided peaks

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tetrahedral-pyramid/1016608.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tetrahedral-pyramid/1016608.md?page=3)
