# Texas gun group "simulates" Paris attack... result? Really hard to kill gunmen even if armed.

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/texas-gun-group-simulates-paris-attack-result-really-hard-to-kill-gunmen-even-if-armed/709906>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [January 15, 2015, 5:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/texas-gun-group-simulates-paris-attack-result-really-hard-to-kill-gunmen-even-if-armed/709906 "2015-01-15T17:24:31Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2015, 5:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/texas-gun-group-simulates-paris-attack-result-really-hard-to-kill-gunmen-even-if-armed/709906/1 "2015-01-15T17:24:31Z")

</div>

[Here’s](http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2015/01/13/gun-owners-participate-in-simulation-of-paris-massacre/) the link.

They laid out an office similar to the Hebdo offices, with 12 people as the civilians, one of whom was “armed” (with a paintball gun), simulating concealed-carry. Then two gunmen entered at some point with paintball rifles, with the goal of “killing” everyone.

They rotated the role of the “armed” civilian – only 2 of the 12 were able to “kill” one of the gunmen, and none of them were able to “kill” both of the gunmen. One was able to escape by fleeing.

Maybe it’s in bad taste. In any case, the results aren’t that surprising to me – one armed civilian probably doesn’t make much of a difference in an attack like this, unfortunately.

I wonder how this would play out in other scenarios – for example, I’ve heard some say that if multiple civilians were armed in a terrorist attack, this could _increase_ the danger, because they (and the police response) may not know who is the good guy and who is not. Perhaps this could be simulated – like, say, on a mock subway car, or mock movie theater – have a handful of random civilians be “armed”… one is a terrorist, and the rest are “good guy” civilians – what happens when the terrorist opens up and starts shooting people? If everyone has different color paintballs, we could determine how many are killed by the civilians, and how many by terrorists.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Scumpup](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ce73a5/32.png) [@Scumpup](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Scumpup)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2015, 5:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/texas-gun-group-simulates-paris-attack-result-really-hard-to-kill-gunmen-even-if-armed/709906/2 "2015-01-15T17:30:37Z")

</div>

I am an armed civilian and the only difference I would hope to make in such a situation is keeping myself alive, whether I do that by shooting or by running. I can’t speak for any other armed citizens, but such has always been my policy. I carry to protect me, not you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2015, 5:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/texas-gun-group-simulates-paris-attack-result-really-hard-to-kill-gunmen-even-if-armed/709906/3 "2015-01-15T17:32:48Z")

</div>

> [@Scumpup](#):
>
> I am an armed civilian and the only difference I would hope to make in such a situation is keeping myself alive, whether I do that by shooting or by running. I can’t speak for any other armed citizens, but such has always been my policy. I carry to protect me, not you.

In the simulation, the armed civilian failed to protect himself in all but one case. Two were able to shoot one of the gunmen, but they were “killed” by the other gunman.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![robert\_columbia](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e79b87/32.png) [@robert\_columbia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/robert_columbia)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2015, 5:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/texas-gun-group-simulates-paris-attack-result-really-hard-to-kill-gunmen-even-if-armed/709906/4 "2015-01-15T17:32:57Z")

</div>

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> …I wonder how this would play out in other scenarios – for example, I’ve heard some say that if multiple civilians were armed in a terrorist attack, this could _increase_ the danger, because they (and the police response) may not know who is the good guy and who is not…

This is one of the things that dissuades me from carrying. If I end up in a fight and the bad guy is lying on the ground in a pool of blood with me hovering over him and then the police arrive, what do I do to let them know that I’m not the baddie so I don’t get shot as an “armed and dangerous” suspect? Put my hands up immediately?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![robert\_columbia](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e79b87/32.png) [@robert\_columbia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/robert_columbia)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2015, 5:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/texas-gun-group-simulates-paris-attack-result-really-hard-to-kill-gunmen-even-if-armed/709906/5 "2015-01-15T17:34:09Z")

</div>

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> In the simulation, the armed civilian failed to protect himself in all but one case. Two were able to shoot one of the gunmen, but they were “killed” by the other gunman.

But taking one of them out with you is arguably better than just sitting there and letting them kill you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Scumpup](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ce73a5/32.png) [@Scumpup](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Scumpup)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2015, 5:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/texas-gun-group-simulates-paris-attack-result-really-hard-to-kill-gunmen-even-if-armed/709906/6 "2015-01-15T17:35:08Z")

</div>

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> In the simulation, the armed civilian failed to protect himself in all but one case. Two were able to shoot one of the gunmen, but they were “killed” by the other gunman.

Which is why I kept the option to run on the table. How many of the people who couldn’t shoot back (no gun) survived, on the average?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Peremensoe](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/ce7236/32.png) [@Peremensoe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Peremensoe)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2015, 5:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/texas-gun-group-simulates-paris-attack-result-really-hard-to-kill-gunmen-even-if-armed/709906/7 "2015-01-15T17:36:32Z")

</div>

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> In the simulation, the armed civilian failed to protect himself in all but one case. Two were able to shoot one of the gunmen, but they were “killed” by the other gunman.

So that makes 3/12 of the sims which turned out nominally better (less successful for the attackers) than the real incident?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2015, 5:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/texas-gun-group-simulates-paris-attack-result-really-hard-to-kill-gunmen-even-if-armed/709906/8 "2015-01-15T17:39:15Z")

</div>

And unlike the original, in all the reenactments they were expecting the attacks, so the amount of panic and surprise could not possibly be the same.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Scumpup](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ce73a5/32.png) [@Scumpup](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Scumpup)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2015, 5:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/texas-gun-group-simulates-paris-attack-result-really-hard-to-kill-gunmen-even-if-armed/709906/9 "2015-01-15T17:40:26Z")

</div>

I consider the whole exercise of very limited value. Everybody concerned knew in advance that there would be an attack and how many attackers there would be. The attackers knew in advance that one of the targets would be armed. Since the whole exercise was non-lethal, there is no disincentive for making wildly bad tactical decisions.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2015, 5:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/texas-gun-group-simulates-paris-attack-result-really-hard-to-kill-gunmen-even-if-armed/709906/10 "2015-01-15T17:45:05Z")

</div>

> [@Scumpup](#):
>
> I consider the whole exercise of very limited value. Everybody concerned knew in advance that there would be an attack and how many attackers there would be. The attackers knew in advance that one of the targets would be armed. Since the whole exercise was non-lethal, there is no disincentive for making wildly bad tactical decisions.

Yeah – knowing that one is in a simulation, and there’s no actual fear for one’s life, definitely changes things.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2015, 5:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/texas-gun-group-simulates-paris-attack-result-really-hard-to-kill-gunmen-even-if-armed/709906/11 "2015-01-15T17:46:07Z")

</div>

> [@Peremensoe](#):
>
> So that makes 3/12 of the sims which turned out nominally better (less successful for the attackers) than the real incident?

Not sure if there was any overlap – if the “escape” happened in the same one as one of the killers being shot.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Peremensoe](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/ce7236/32.png) [@Peremensoe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Peremensoe)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2015, 5:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/texas-gun-group-simulates-paris-attack-result-really-hard-to-kill-gunmen-even-if-armed/709906/12 "2015-01-15T17:53:17Z")

</div>

I can think of a bunch of things to improve the exercise, make it very interesting for all participating… but I’m not sure it would tell us much more than could have been postulated to begin with:

1. An armed civilian has a _chance_ of taking out an attacker.
2. A determined team of attackers is likely to kill many of their targets, regardless.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Scumpup](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ce73a5/32.png) [@Scumpup](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Scumpup)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2015, 5:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/texas-gun-group-simulates-paris-attack-result-really-hard-to-kill-gunmen-even-if-armed/709906/13 "2015-01-15T17:57:03Z")

</div>

The element of surprise is tremendously valuable when seeking to kill your fellow man. In this scenario, it does work in both directions, at least a little. When you come stampeding into an office set on murdering a group of helpless people, armed resistance is quite likely going to throw your groove off.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2015, 6:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/texas-gun-group-simulates-paris-attack-result-really-hard-to-kill-gunmen-even-if-armed/709906/14 "2015-01-15T18:01:15Z")

</div>

No, 1/12 turned out better. Good guys surviving is a good outcome. Bad guys dying is not, in itself, a good outcome, except insofar as it contributes to good guys surviving.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![El\_Kabong](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/el_kabong/32/496_2.png) [@El\_Kabong](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/El_Kabong)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2015, 6:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/texas-gun-group-simulates-paris-attack-result-really-hard-to-kill-gunmen-even-if-armed/709906/15 "2015-01-15T18:54:21Z")

</div>

Just a reminder that one of the people killed in the Charlie Hebdo shootings was a police officer (and presumably armed), assigned as a bodyguard to editor Stephane Charbonniere. If a single armed professional had no chance, I could not be optimistic about the chances of a single armed non-professional.

[Quote=Wikipedia]  
Franck Brinsolaro, 49, Protection Service police officer assigned as a bodyguard for Charb  
[/quote]

> **[Charlie Hebdo shooting](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Hebdo_shootings)**
>
> On 7 January 2015, at about 11:30 a.m. in Paris, France, the employees of the French satirical weekly magazine Charlie Hebdo were targeted in a terrorist shooting attack by two French-born Algerian Muslim brothers, Saïd Kouachi and Chérif Kouachi. Armed with rifles and other weapons, the duo murdered 12 people and injured 11 others; they identified themselves as members of al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, which claimed responsibility for the attack. They fled after the shooting, triggering a...

Note: this was not the second police officewr who was killed in the stgreet outside as the attackers were leaving.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Terr](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/839c29/32.png) [@Terr](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Terr)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2015, 6:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/texas-gun-group-simulates-paris-attack-result-really-hard-to-kill-gunmen-even-if-armed/709906/16 "2015-01-15T18:59:05Z")

</div>

> [@robert\_columbia](#):
>
> This is one of the things that dissuades me from carrying. If I end up in a fight and the bad guy is lying on the ground in a pool of blood with me hovering over him and then the police arrive, what do I do to let them know that I’m not the baddie so I don’t get shot as an “armed and dangerous” suspect? Put my hands up immediately?

I know, horrible situation to be in, right? Much better when it’s you lying on the ground in a pool of blood with the bad guy hovering over you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Scumpup](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ce73a5/32.png) [@Scumpup](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Scumpup)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2015, 7:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/texas-gun-group-simulates-paris-attack-result-really-hard-to-kill-gunmen-even-if-armed/709906/17 "2015-01-15T19:06:25Z")

</div>

> [@El\_Kabong](#):
>
> Just a reminder that one of the people killed in the Charlie Hebdo shootings was a police officer (and presumably armed), assigned as a bodyguard to editor Stephane Charbonniere. If a single armed professional had no chance, I could not be optimistic about the chances of a single armed non-professional.
> 
> [Charlie Hebdo shooting - Wikipedia](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Hebdo_shootings)
> 
> Note: this was not the second police officewr who was killed in the stgreet outside as the attackers were leaving.

Whatever you may be optimistic about, I would prefer to be armed in such a situation.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fear\_Itself](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fear_itself/32/19637_2.png) [@Fear\_Itself](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fear_Itself)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2015, 7:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/texas-gun-group-simulates-paris-attack-result-really-hard-to-kill-gunmen-even-if-armed/709906/18 "2015-01-15T19:14:30Z")

</div>

> [@Scumpup](#):
>
> I carry to protect me, not you.

Which is why I vote to take away your right to carry. Most of the hostages were rescued; not so much if someone with a gun tries to play hero.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Peremensoe](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/ce7236/32.png) [@Peremensoe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Peremensoe)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2015, 7:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/texas-gun-group-simulates-paris-attack-result-really-hard-to-kill-gunmen-even-if-armed/709906/19 "2015-01-15T19:17:12Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> No, 1/12 turned out better. Good guys surviving is a good outcome. Bad guys dying is not, in itself, a good outcome, except insofar as it contributes to good guys surviving.

Which it is generally understood to do (as would capture). That’s why police pursued and eventually shot the actual guys.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Scumpup](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ce73a5/32.png) [@Scumpup](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Scumpup)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2015, 7:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/texas-gun-group-simulates-paris-attack-result-really-hard-to-kill-gunmen-even-if-armed/709906/20 "2015-01-15T19:21:48Z")

</div>

> [@Fear\_Itself](#):
>
> Which is why I vote to take away your right to carry. Most of the hostages were rescued; not so much if someone with a gun tries to play hero.

If I had said anything\_at all\_ about being a hero, this reply would have made sense. I didn’t and it doesn’t; so, I must presume that you just wanted to somehow work into the conversation that you object to armed citizens. In point of fact, I indicated that I would run away if that action would save my life. At no point did I say anything about rescuing any hostages. You got to air your objection, though, so there is that.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/texas-gun-group-simulates-paris-attack-result-really-hard-to-kill-gunmen-even-if-armed/709906.md?page=2)
