Texas gun group "simulates" Paris attack... result? Really hard to kill gunmen even if armed.

Here are some cites of armed civilians stopping mass shooters before they killed more.

Can you give me a few where armed civilian response made matters worse?

The first three were not stopped until they tried to flee.
The fourth was stopped by unarmed students.
Only the last actually put a stop to a shooting in progress.

In none of these cases were there more than one shooter.

Terr, if you want some actual ammo, try these.

http://dailyanarchist.com/2012/07/31/auditing-shooting-rampage-statistics/

This certainly turned out worse for the guy carrying:

“who ran to his car for his bulletproof vest and service pistol before tackling the suspect.”

Anyway - any cites about armed civilians making it worse?

That’s not what you were talking about and not the cite I asked. Care to give an example of armed civilians making matters worse?

He didn’t use the pistol, though, and the others were unarmed. Poor example.

Unless you propose that civilians are only armed when there’s a mass shooter, your request for cites is too small. You’re probably calling for civilians to be armed at all times in case there’s a shooting. In that case, we can cite any case in which someone concealed-carrying made things worse,

And you know that he didn’t use it in tackling the guy - how? No, he didn’t shoot the guy - but neither did some of the people in other examples. But the guns certainly helped.

This has turned into another gun debate. Luckily we have a place for that.

Moved.

Cool. Let’s take Texas - pretty easy to get a Concealed Carry license here. This is for 2011.

http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/RSD/CHL/Reports/ConvictionRatesReport2011.pdf

Assault with deadly weapon (no idea if it is the gun) - 3 out of 2,765
Robbery - 2 out of 2,210
Deadly Conduct Discharge Firearm - 2 out of 244
Manslaughter - 3 out of 112
Murder - 3 out of 466

About 3% of the adults in Texas have concealed weapon license. Yet they commit a tiny fraction of a percent of crimes.

Let’s see you hand-wave this one away:

The horrible situation I’d most worry about is shooting the wrong person. I’ve trained with firearms, but I still wouldn’t want to be carrying one except in certain, limited situations (basically, when I’m on duty in some way with some sort of security responsibility). That’s just me, though.

The CHL holder took control of the situation by removing the hostage from the equation.

Oh you found one.

Oh, that was a cite you specifically asked for…then casually handwaved away, it seems. Now explain why any future request from you for cites should be honored?

I tend to think that, just when I’m going around town, I’d rather not have a gun – I’d rather risk not being able to shoot the bad guy than risk shooting the wrong person.

I’d probably be just fine with carrying a non-lethal weapon, though, if legal.

Yeah, that was a one-off, could never happen again.

Oh, wait:

Here’s a recent one. A situation which would have been zero shooters killing innocent victims turned into one shooter killing an innocent victim, as a result of a civilian going armed.

Wait, acknowledging that you found one is “handwaving”?