[The post below contains vague spoilers for the Prince of Nothing series. I’m not boxing them because there are no specifics of the plot mentioned, only the overall quality of it.]
Man, I know exactly what you’re talking about, Morbo. I’ve completely given up reading sci-fi or fantasy books unless I know that the series they’re inevitably a part of is completely finished. If I start a series that’s not done yet, I always lose interest in it by the time the next book is coming out. Also, if the whole series is done before I even start reading, I can’t be tricked into reading ten books just because I want to know how the thing ends. Only a trilogy? Sign me up. Decalogue with prequels? No thanks.
Enter R. Scott Bakker. His book The Darkness that Comes Before has a flashy cover so of course I am intrigued, but it clearly states “The Prince of Nothing, Book I” on it. Thus I don’t even consider wading in; to do so would violate my policy. Several years pass. Then I see his latest book, The Thousandfold Thought, that proudly advertises itself as “the conclusion to the Prince of Nothing series.” Hot damn, I think to myself, I can finally crack open this flashy cover and sink my teeth into a complete, self-encapsulated whole. And so I did.
Now, without spoiling anything specific, let me opine for a second.
To say that the third book, the soi-disant “conclusion,” wraps up absolutely none of the storylines is an understatement. Not only does it fail to even mention the cliffhanger at the very end of the second book, it wallops you with an even bigger one. Not only do none–none–of the characters have their conflicts with themselves or one another resolved (unless they end up dead), we get about three new major conflicts in the last chapter. And most egregiously, not only does the main story arc of the whole trilogy end pretty much resolved-in-name-only (i.e. not resolved at all), the book’s ending tries its hardest to make that whole arc irrelevant.
All of which, to be honest, would be basically fine with me if the book itself didn’t actually state it was “the conclusion to the series.” I mean, what the hell kind of conclusion is that? Surely this cannot be. A misprint, maybe? I frantically searched the web for some sign that this was not the actual last book of the series. And this is where R. Scott Bakker subverted my fantasy series policy.
It was the last book. Only now the author has started another series. That’s set in the same universe and about the same characters and takes place after the events in the last book.
Under what bizarre definition of “series” do these shenanigans make sense? As far as I can tell, this whole Prince of Nothing “trilogy” was merely a ploy to lull me into complacency, to make me think the series was finished and thus buy this guy’s books. Well, it didn’t work: I got them from the library.