# That touchy abortion thang...

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/that-touchy-abortion-thang/10343>\
**Category:** Miscellaneous and Personal Stuff I Must Share\
**Created:** [October 27, 1999, 3:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/that-touchy-abortion-thang/10343 "1999-10-27T15:26:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SterlingNorth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/8dc957/32.png) [@SterlingNorth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SterlingNorth)\
**Post date:** [October 28, 1999, 3:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/that-touchy-abortion-thang/10343/41 "1999-10-28T03:29:00Z")

</div>

Actually **Sake** , my contention is that you would put millions of lives at risk every year, just because you have a romaticized view of reality. Many people have killed themselves trying to perform a back-alley abortion. Do you _really_ want to wish this on somebody, because you didn’t feel like throwing out a life-preserver.

Yes, some are willfully ignorant. Some make mistakes. Some, however, had no control in the matter. This is a life-or-death decision in more ways than one.  
I don’t think any of us are in a position to pre-judge anonymous faces.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pickman\_s\_Model](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/b9bd4f/32.png) [@Pickman\_s\_Model](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pickman_s_Model)\
**Post date:** [October 28, 1999, 3:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/that-touchy-abortion-thang/10343/42 "1999-10-28T03:31:00Z")

</div>

FTR, I’m pro-life, but not rabidly so. I realize there are a number of reasons a woman might choose to get an abortion, which might seem reasonable to her at the time, even though I think it’s a mistake to do so. I’m also realistic enough to realize that abortion is probably never going to go away—it’s here to stay, whether I, we, or they like it or not.

The one thing that really burns me about the whole debate, however, is this use of euphemism. I.e., “It’s not an unborn human being.” Oh really? Then what, pray tell, is it? An unborn kangaroo? An unborn zebra? An unborn 1956 Chevy BelAir Deluxe, mayhap? If it were allowed to exist up to its being born, what would it be then? Oh, a human being. My stars, how interesting. If a woman walks into a clinic to get an abortion, the doctor can perform the procedure, and since everybody volunteered for the duty, no call, no foul. But! If a pregnant woman is shot in the stomach and her unborn fetus is killed, then, _then,_ it’s murder and the shooter goes to jail. Huh? Look, either it is or it isn’t. Either you can or you can’t. The current laws concerning definitions of unborn whatever-you-wanna-call-'ems are a tad ephemeral, to say the least.

The only other thing I’d say is that I have read some of the stuff put out by the so-called “ethicist” Peter Singer, and he is extremely frightening, to say the least. This is the type of reasoning that gave us people like Joseph Mengele and Adolf Eichmann.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![matt\_mcl](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/7ab992/32.png) [@matt\_mcl](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/matt_mcl)\
**Post date:** [October 28, 1999, 4:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/that-touchy-abortion-thang/10343/43 "1999-10-28T04:39:00Z")

</div>

A side note:

My [now ex-]boyfriend and I were sitting in bed one day arguing about abortion. He was pro-life, I was pro-choice. We dickered for about a half-hour until _we realized it was pretty fucking stupid for two fags to be arguing about abortion._

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/original/2X/e/e489c3b7d8fce19c4b355dd4fc3f88cc39c34b87.png) [@system](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/system)\
**Post date:** [October 28, 1999, 5:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/that-touchy-abortion-thang/10343/44 "1999-10-28T05:22:00Z")

</div>

What irks me is the blatant double-standard afforded to women when it comes to anything involving a fetus.

Ooh, she’s pregnant? Well, a quick trip to the doc and the problem tissue is removed. People hold her hand and support her.

Oh no, she miscarries? She is lost in grief and depression over the death of her child. People hold her hand and support her.

And as someone else mentioned…oh no, someone kills her and her unborn baby? He’s guilty of _double_ murder. People kick his ass and demonize him.

But the first woman who got the abortion–also killing a fetus–is innocent, of course. Laws in this country are simply absurd.

Sometimes I am grateful I’m not a man, because even as a _woman_, I do not get the female line of thinking. I can’t imagine how ridiculous it must seem to a man. It’s hypocrisy at its most obscene.

FTR, I’m starting to climb up on the fence. I do believe a baby is a baby is a baby regardless of age in or out of the womb, but I also believe a woman does have the right to choose. I do prefer that she choose life, but…I’m not her, and can’t make someone else’s decision.

* * *

I used to think the world was against me. Now I know better. Some of the smaller countries are neutral.

[Laura’s Stuff and Things](http://members.aol.com/lrconaway)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sake\_Samurai](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/bc79bd/32.png) [@Sake\_Samurai](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sake_Samurai)\
**Post date:** [October 28, 1999, 6:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/that-touchy-abortion-thang/10343/45 "1999-10-28T06:07:00Z")

</div>

That was funny as shit, matt.

SterlingNorth: Not romantic. You see, I’m willing to accept the loss of some unfit mothers, who end up dead due to a botched hack abortion.

If I was female, I’d never have an abortion. Period.

If I wanted to, though, I should be able to walk into a legal, sanitary, professional facility, and throw down $250 and say, “Abort this human life inside of me, please.” I would strike down anyone who would take that right from me. If you are protesting the clinic and try to prevent my entrance, you’d better be willing to kill me for your beliefs.

I do NOT judge the women in my life who have had abortions. It is their decision. It is their right. I hold them in high esteem if they realize they took a life, but say it was for the greater good of their own life. I hold them in low esteem only if they deny the moral repercussions of their actions.

The government should entirely stay out of the whole debate. No legislation. No funding. If clinics are being bombed and women attacked - the criminals should be tried under the existing laws that deal with such mayhem. Abortion need not be a special case.

* * *

Hell is Other People.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Satan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e9bcb4/32.png) [@Satan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Satan)\
**Post date:** [October 28, 1999, 6:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/that-touchy-abortion-thang/10343/46 "1999-10-28T06:55:00Z")

</div>

LauraRae:

It’s pretty simple to answer your question about abortion vs. unborn baby killed by bad person.

In the former case, the person is making a decision based upon their morality to have an abortion. It is her body, and that indivisual person does not feel that the fetus is a “child,” but a problem.

And to try and change her wishes on what to do with her body by forcing her to have that baby is abominable.

In the latter case, a person is pregnant, is already looking forward to the kid, named it, bought furniture, can envision it being in college, and in general DOES see the fetus as a chld.

And to try and change her wishes on what to do with her body by killing that “baby” is abominable.

Seems pretty consistant to me…

* * *

Yer pal,  
Satan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pmh](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/df705f/32.png) [@pmh](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pmh)\
**Post date:** [October 28, 1999, 8:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/that-touchy-abortion-thang/10343/47 "1999-10-28T08:00:00Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> If I was female, I’d never have an abortion. Period. - Sake Samurai

Sake,  
I spent 20 min typing and deleting profanities directed at you. I’m calmer now.  
There is NO way you can make that statement until you are actually IN that situation.  
[b/]PERIOD.\*\*

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pmh](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/df705f/32.png) [@pmh](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pmh)\
**Post date:** [October 28, 1999, 8:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/that-touchy-abortion-thang/10343/48 "1999-10-28T08:17:00Z")

</div>

ok, I screwed up the UBB tags.

My point is:  
This entire issue is one of personal morality. Only the woman in question can say what is Right or Wrong. Everyone else should STFU.

(I appologise for my attitude. This issue has touched me more deeply than I would have liked.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PunditLisa](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/4af34b/32.png) [@PunditLisa](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/PunditLisa)\
**Post date:** [October 28, 1999, 12:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/that-touchy-abortion-thang/10343/49 "1999-10-28T12:06:00Z")

</div>

My view is this: A woman should have the right to terminate her pregnancy anytime in the first trimester. After that, it should be severely limited. Third trimester abortions should be banned entirely except for medical emergencies.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pldennison](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/9fc29f/32.png) [@pldennison](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pldennison)\
**Post date:** [October 28, 1999, 12:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/that-touchy-abortion-thang/10343/50 "1999-10-28T12:15:00Z")

</div>

Rousseau sayeth:

> [@](#):
>
> When presented with the adoption alternative, many pro-choicers assert that the woman shouldn’t have to carry the baby for nine months if she doesn’t want to. Pardon my French, but bullshit. It’s called taking responsibility for your actions.

No, it’s called you controlling other people’s actions because they offend your sensitivities. Exactly the kind of thing people like you usually “bust liberals” for. (More on that later.)

> [@](#):
>
> You made choices, here are the consequences.

Who, exactly, put you in charge of deciding this?

> [@](#):
>
> If it’s inconvenient for you, tough bloody luck. We’re talking about human lives here,

Yes, and by all means we should allow children to be raised by people obviously unfit to have them. Then we can punish the mothers **and** the children! Yay!

> [@](#):
>
> and whether they “exist” now or will “exist” in the near future, everybody deserves at least a shot at life.

Exactly why?

> [@](#):
>
> Here’s a question for you pro-choicers. If nobody has the power to infringe on a woman’s right to choose abortion, does anyone have the power to infringe on my right to shoot deer? Not that I hunt or ever would, but I just like to bust on the liberals.

Yes, that’s right, only liberals could possibly be pro-choice, huh?

Sake sayeth:

> [@](#):
>
> Are you dead broke - have no job - contemplating suicide - smoking - etc? Then don’t you dare have sex with anyone. Not until you’re mature enough to deal with it.

Ah, more controlling other people’s actions.

Pickman’s Model sayeth:

> [@](#):
>
> The one thing that really burns me about the whole debate, however, is this use of euphemism. I.e., “It’s not an unborn human being.” Oh really?

I haven’t seen a single person in this thread make that claim; and speaking for myself, I said _precisely_ the opposite. So this is a bit of a strawman to the extent it concerns this thread.

* * *

“I love God! He’s so deliciously evil!” - Stewie Griffin, _Family Guy_

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Peter\_North](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/65b543/32.png) [@Peter\_North](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Peter_North)\
**Post date:** [October 28, 1999, 1:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/that-touchy-abortion-thang/10343/51 "1999-10-28T13:18:00Z")

</div>

Shirley: Are you saying you life has not been enriched by your brothers? It seems to me by your post that they have been just a burden.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Persephone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/ecc23a/32.png) [@Persephone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Persephone)\
**Post date:** [October 28, 1999, 2:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/that-touchy-abortion-thang/10343/52 "1999-10-28T14:55:00Z")

</div>

I didn’t see that at all, Peter. What I saw in Shirley’s post was statements of fact. I have a stepson who has an older sister with extreme disabilities. She is, as Shirley stated, in diapers for life. She is 11 years old, on her birth certificate. In reality, she’s not much older than my 3 week old son. Her name is Amanda. Her mother has told me pretty much the same thing that Shirley said. But there’s one kicker…the pregnancy progressed normally, and the handicaps occurred due to complications that arose during Amanda’s birth. Tracy has told me herself that had these handicaps been present and obvious during the pregnancy, she may well have aborted. She obviously loves Amanda, though, as do I.

Sorry, didn’t mean to get off topic. Just felt I had to reply.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Peter\_North](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/65b543/32.png) [@Peter\_North](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Peter_North)\
**Post date:** [October 28, 1999, 4:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/that-touchy-abortion-thang/10343/53 "1999-10-28T16:18:00Z")

</div>

What I was getting at is that with abortion comes ideas of what “might have been.” Who really knows what the potential of a baby is, even one with disabilities.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sake\_Samurai](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/bc79bd/32.png) [@Sake\_Samurai](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sake_Samurai)\
**Post date:** [October 28, 1999, 4:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/that-touchy-abortion-thang/10343/54 "1999-10-28T16:43:00Z")

</div>

Pmh: Your sentiment is hollow. Saying

> [@](#):
>
> There is NO way you can make that statement until you are actually IN that situation.

is identical to saying that there’s no way for you to say, “If I was a man, I would NEVER rape a woman.” Who knows, maybe you would, right?

I know enough women to reasonably state that my morals wouldn’t change if my sex did. And it’s also just like saying that only a serial killer has the right to judge Son of Sam or Jeff Dahmer. Everyone who’s not a maladjusted, psychotic freak should STFU, right?

Pldennison: I am not

> [@](#):
>
> controlling

merely opining. The same thing you did when you stated, however “humbly”

> [@](#):
>
> It becomes a “person” after it is born

In fact, I have stated that we, as a society, should NOT control this issue at all. No laws, no funding, no “controlling” dogma. My opinion is just that. Accusing posters of “controlling” others is no way to advance this debate.

Perhaps you’re not suited to this discussion.

Woops, there I go again “controlling!”

* * *

Hell is Other People.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pldennison](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/9fc29f/32.png) [@pldennison](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pldennison)\
**Post date:** [October 29, 1999, 5:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/that-touchy-abortion-thang/10343/55 "1999-10-29T05:17:00Z")

</div>

Sure it’s controlling. I mean, are there other medical procedures you think should be subject to this “no funding” restriction, or just abortions?

Why do you think it is not right to abort a baby, but it is right to forcibly consign it to a life of misery if it is going to be born to an unfit mother? Where the hell is the morality in that?

* * *

“I love God! He’s so deliciously evil!” - Stewie Griffin, _Family Guy_

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sake\_Samurai](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/bc79bd/32.png) [@Sake\_Samurai](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sake_Samurai)\
**Post date:** [October 29, 1999, 5:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/that-touchy-abortion-thang/10343/56 "1999-10-29T05:44:00Z")

</div>

I don’t think this - I would sooner kill the unfit mother and give the newborn to one of the thousands of fit couples looking to adopt than let her ruin a second life.

And like I said, just because **I** wouldn’t have an abortion, doesn’t mean I don’t think others should have that right.

* * *

Hell is Other People.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pldennison](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/9fc29f/32.png) [@pldennison](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pldennison)\
**Post date:** [October 28, 1999, 7:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/that-touchy-abortion-thang/10343/57 "1999-10-28T19:00:00Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> I don’t think this - I would sooner kill the unfit mother and give the newborn to one of the thousands of fit couples looking to adopt than let her ruin a second life.

So, then, your concept of a right to life does not extend to adult human beings?

* * *

“I love God! He’s so deliciously evil!” - Stewie Griffin, _Family Guy_

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sake\_Samurai](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/bc79bd/32.png) [@Sake\_Samurai](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sake_Samurai)\
**Post date:** [October 28, 1999, 7:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/that-touchy-abortion-thang/10343/58 "1999-10-28T19:22:00Z")

</div>

I never said anything whatsoever about the “right” to life.

I happen to agree with your previous sentiment:

> [@](#):
>
> Try asserting your right to live to Hurricane Floyd or a wild animal and see where it gets you.

I just think that people who actively mutilate or end other people’s lives should be terminated with due process. Here I would define “people” to read “human past the stage of gestation” - so I suppose “murder” shouldn’t be used to refer to abortion.

It would be “acceptable infanticide” or something as equally creepy.

There’s only something sacred about life if you happen to be that particular form of life.

* * *

Hell is Other People.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SterlingNorth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/8dc957/32.png) [@SterlingNorth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SterlingNorth)\
**Post date:** [October 28, 1999, 7:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/that-touchy-abortion-thang/10343/59 "1999-10-28T19:57:00Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> I’m willing to accept the loss of some unfit mothers, who end up dead due to a botched hack abortion.  
> **Sake** \<font size=1 color=#800080\>10-28-1999 01:07 AM\</font\>  
> I would sooner kill the unfit mother and give the newborn to one of the thousands of fit couples looking to adopt than let her ruin a second life.  
> \<font size=1 color=#800080\>10-28-1999 12:44 PM\</font\>

And I’m willing to accept that your “concern for the lives of others” is a incredibly hollow statement.

> [@](#):
>
> just because **I** wouldn’t have an abortion, doesn’t mean I don’t think others should have that right.

No, just those who can afford that right. Should we institute a _literacy test_ before all abortions. (you know to make sure they are educated enough to make the decision) Make them recite _Roe v. Wade_ by memory.

I don’t think you answered Phil’s question. Let’s try again.  
\<blockquote\>Why do you think it is not right to abort a baby, but it is right to forcibly consign it to a life of misery if it is going to be born to an unfit mother? Where the hell is the morality in that?\</blockquote\>

* * *

It is by the fortune of God that, in this country, we have three benefits: freedom of speech, freedom of thought, and the wisdom never to use either.  
—_Mark Twain_

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rousseau](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/779978/32.png) [@Rousseau](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rousseau)\
**Post date:** [October 28, 1999, 8:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/that-touchy-abortion-thang/10343/60 "1999-10-28T20:21:00Z")

</div>

Gee, I always miss out on all the meat of these conversations, because I gotta go to stupid **SCHOOL.** Anywho, here are my rather late responses:

> [@](#):
>
> My brothers all have MD. My father in law is paralyzed from the chest down from an accident.I know disabilities from the genetic standpoint and the accident standpoint. I’ve had experience with the Mentally Retarded and have a very distant distant cousin who’s retarded.

This may sound morbid, but just out of curiosity, do you think that **ANY** of them would rather not be alive at all? And I mean really, truly believe it, not just comment on it in their worst moments.

As for you people who don’t agree that everybody deserves a shot at life, I pity you, because you must lead some pretty mundane lives. Because anybody who has really experienced the beauty and joy of this world knows that **EVERYONE** should have a chance to enjoy it. Maybe the baby (more rhymes, what IS it with me?) will be impoverished. Maybe Jr. will be deformed. Maybe Jr. won’t know his real parents. But Jr. will be _alive_. And that, friends and well-wishers, is what is truly important.

* * *

The IQ of a group is equal to the IQ of the dumbest member divided by the number of people in the group.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/that-touchy-abortion-thang/10343.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/that-touchy-abortion-thang/10343.md?page=4)
