# The 100 Most Influential People - Try the Third

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-100-most-influential-people-try-the-third/536080>\
**Category:** The Game Room\
**Created:** [April 14, 2010, 4:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-100-most-influential-people-try-the-third/536080 "2010-04-14T16:58:22Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 13\
**Page:** 36

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Uncle\_Goat](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/8e8cbc/32.png) [@Uncle\_Goat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Uncle_Goat)\
**Post date:** [June 29, 2010, 2:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-100-most-influential-people-try-the-third/536080/701 "2010-06-29T02:02:08Z")

</div>

A fine time indeed. Like so many things, my votes would change depending on I how I felt – or how the dice feel in some cases – but for the most part the SD list strikes me as more realistic than Hart’s. I remain confused that Hart was willing to rate Hitler and Stalin but not Churchill and FDR. Ah well. Each to list as he chooses.

Thanks.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Measure\_for\_Measure](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/measure_for_measure/32/557_2.png) [@Measure\_for\_Measure](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Measure_for_Measure)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2010, 12:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-100-most-influential-people-try-the-third/536080/702 "2010-06-30T00:52:31Z")

</div>

I took the top 20 from the SDMB list and the top 20 from Hart’s list and merged them. Here they are in alphabetical order:

Albert Einstein physicist; relativity; Einsteinian physics  
Antoine Laurent Lavoisier father of modern chemistry; philosopher; economist  
Aristotle influential Greek philosopher  
Augustus Caesar ruler  
Buddha founder of Buddhism  
Charles Darwin biologist; described Darwinian evolution  
Christopher Columbus explorer; led Europe to Americas  
Confucius founder of Confucianism  
Euclid mathematician; Euclidian geometry  
Galileo Galilei astronomer; accurately described heliocentric solar system  
Genghis Khan SDMB 8  
George Washington SDMB 6  
Isaac Newton Physicst, Mathematician  
James Watt SDMB 10  
Jesus Christ founder of Christianity  
Johann Gutenberg developed movable type; printed Bibles  
Karl Marx SDMB 20  
Lenin SDMB 17  
Louis Pasteur scientist; pasteurization  
Moses major prophet of Judaism  
Mohammad Prophet of Islam; conqueror of Arabia  
Nicolaus Copernicus astronomer; taught heliocentricity  
Plato SDMB 11  
Shih Huang Ti Chinese emperor  
St Paul Judaism; Christianity  
Sui Wen Ti, unified China, SDMB 13  
Thomas Edison SDMB 15  
Ts’ai Lun inventor of paper

Those compiling a personal top 10 list might choose from among these candidates.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JohnT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnt/32/15048_2.png) [@JohnT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JohnT)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2010, 2:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-100-most-influential-people-try-the-third/536080/703 "2010-06-30T02:19:26Z")

</div>

My ten (ranked, hurredly):

1. Aristotle
2. Isaac Newton
3. Gutenberg
4. James Watt
5. Euclid
6. Jesus Christ
7. Louis Pastuer
8. St. Paul
9. Thomas Edison
10. Mohammed

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JohnT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnt/32/15048_2.png) [@JohnT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JohnT)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2010, 2:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-100-most-influential-people-try-the-third/536080/704 "2010-06-30T02:52:03Z")

</div>

Obviously I don’t think much of leaders. When I went through the rounds, I had three different criteria I used to make my selections:

1. Originality of idea
2. 
# of people affected
3. Turning points

The only two leaders which may have broken my top 10 would be Washington or Alexander the Great, for #3 and 2 respectively. My criteria show a bias towards scientists and inventors, but that’s who I am.

Aristotle, to me, holds all three criteria in spades. His ideas are world-changingly original for his time. As one of the “fathers” of the Greco-Roman branch of Western Civilization, tens of billions of people have been affected by Aristotle’s ideas (most of them without knowing it), and his rationalist-scientific approach to the natural world was a turning point for all mankind.

Gutenberg is a turning point. In 1455, Europe had maybe 10 million books, scrolls, etc, about 1/2 of all written material in the world. By 1600, Europe had over 150,000,000 printed books (88% of the worlds store of knowledge) and innumerable pamphlets, brochures, flyers, and bromides. Combine this explosion of knowledge in a civilization that appreciates the Greek rationalist approach (and is ready to add modifications of its own), and it’s no surprise that 200 years after the presses invention, Newton, the winner of the SDMB voting, appeared.

Newton defies the categories - his triumph is showing what one could achieve in this new scientific age, from explaining why things fall down to making better telescopes, Newton generates awe in the _completeness_ of his ideas. He showed mankind that the world, _all of it_, was open to our understanding… and our use. And he did so in a civilization with tens of thousands of printing presses and tens of millions of literate citizens.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Measure\_for\_Measure](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/measure_for_measure/32/557_2.png) [@Measure\_for\_Measure](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Measure_for_Measure)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2010, 6:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-100-most-influential-people-try-the-third/536080/705 "2010-06-30T06:23:46Z")

</div>

The exercise was harder than I thought, probably because I never worked out what “Influence” meant. (I see that **JohnT** has offered a pretty fair presentation though.) Partly, I used the counterfactual approach: I asked what would have happened if you took the individual out of history. But mostly I shuffled the goalposts around as necessary.

Here they are:  
1 Mohammad  
2 St Paul

Religious types deserve top ranking, if only because of their overwhelming share of the human mind-space. Mohammad beats Christianity because his genius was literary, religious and political. I judge St. Paul to be necessary for Christianity to take hold: Jesus of Nazareth was merely born into the role, as it were. Alternatively, I ascribe a substantial share of his teachings to those who came before and after him.

3 Johann Gutenberg  
See above. The printshop is prerequisite for the Reformation, the Enlightenment, the Scientific Revolution. It was a precursor to the Industrial Revolution, an application of interchangeable parts and the American system of manufacture. Lose communication and you lose modernity.

4 Aristotle  
The first methodical thinker. A precursor to empiricism. Unfortunately, his philosophical work pushed deduction.

5 Francis Bacon  
The father of empiricism, the scientific method, the advocate of induction. Or anyway, this _would_ be his ranking, if I could actually claim that. But Bacon was born in 1561, 100 years after Copernicus. His contemporary Galileo did fine without being overly influenced by him, to my knowledge. So consider this false entry to be a marker of sorts.

5 Confucius  
6 Alexander

Confucius also possesses a lot of mindshare, as does Tao. Alexander wins the conqueror contest because he pushed Greek ideas deep into the Asian continent while the most successful invader (Genghis Khan) didn’t have a comparable _cultural_ influence. Nor did Caesar, I would argue.

7 Jesus Christ  
8 Nicolaus Copernicus

Well I had to put the Man from Nazareth somewhere! Copernicus was the first scientist to base a major counter-intuitive result from empirical observation, thus permitting the idea of science.

9 Isaac Newton  
10 Buddha  
11 Shakespeare?  
12 Darwin?

Newton loses to Copernicus because the idea of Science was firmly established by the time he was born. But Newton showed the possibilities of successful science, as well as being an intellectual champion of the highest order.

The Buddha secures this ranking because he is a) a religious figure who b) influenced Hinduism. Buddhism itself is a once major religion that is now a noteworthy religion.  
That was my first cut anyway. Debate is welcome!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![septimus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/septimus/32/410_2.png) [@septimus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/septimus)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2010, 8:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-100-most-influential-people-try-the-third/536080/706 "2010-06-30T08:46:16Z")

</div>

Regarding Copernicus and Kepler:

Earlier I rated Kepler as very influential and Copernicus much less so, but have changed my mind and now agree more with Hart and Measure for Measure (though not enough to put Copernicus in the Top Ten).

Kepler’s work and discovery were very brilliant, but perhaps inconsequential! His Laws would have been, for Newton, trivial corollaries of Newton’s more general laws.

I think I demoted Copernicus believing claims that Indian and Islamic astronomers had developed heliocentricism earlier but those claims are mostly seen on the Internet only at … Indian and Islamic sites! It appears true that Copernicus borrowed heavily from Islamic mathematicians, but that may not diminish his influence.

One can Google for other lists of most influential scientists or influential people in general. Most of those lists (unjustly?) rate Kepler much higher than Copernicus. Niels Bohr ranks as very influential on other lists; Hart placed him down at #100 in his first edition, then removed him altogether. Dopers ranked Einstein and Planck as the most influential post-Maxwell scientists; this seems very reasonable to me; is it?

One point to note about Hart’s criterion is that he considers _future_ influence. Einstein had no influence whatsoever before the 20th century so might be ranked low, but Hart considers his 21st, 22nd, 23rd century influence, etc.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![septimus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/septimus/32/410_2.png) [@septimus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/septimus)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2010, 9:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-100-most-influential-people-try-the-third/536080/707 "2010-06-30T09:39:04Z")

</div>

My Top Eight are all drawn from **Measure for Measure** ’s Top Ten (ignoring his duplicated-5 Bacon :dubious: ). The two of his I want to reject are:

> [@Measure\_for\_Measure](#):
>
> 6 Alexander  
> Alexander wins the conqueror contest because he pushed Greek ideas deep into the Asian continent …
> 
> 8 Nicolaus Copernicus

I put Qin Shi Huang and Augustus Caesar at the top of my leaders list. Since Persia and Egypt were probably due to be Hellenized anyway, and China never was, by “deep into the Asian continent” I think you mean specifically India. I don’t see that development as so consequential.

Agreeing on Newton and Aristotle as the two most influential scientists, I have trouble picking a #3, but Galileo, Pasteur and Einstein would be those who round out my Top Five scientists. And it’s tempting to accept Hart’s choice of Ts’ai Lun. We don’t know he was essential to the invention of paper, but then, isn’t Gutenberg’s own uniqueness also unclear?

Thus my Top Eight are Mohammed, St. Paul, Newton, Aristotle, Confucius, Jesus, Gutenberg, Buddha. If forced to make this Ten, I guess I’d add Einstein and Pasteur.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sohvan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/96bed5/32.png) [@sohvan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sohvan)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2010, 4:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-100-most-influential-people-try-the-third/536080/708 "2010-06-30T16:08:51Z")

</div>

I’d add to the list  
**Nikola Tesla** - For alternating current and the radio among other things  
**Norman Borlaug** - Groundbreaking research in agriculture to develop higher yield and disease resistant grains. Also known as the father of the green revolution  
**Alain Turing** - For his work in computer science, formalisation of the algorithm, and breaking the enigma code in WWII. Without Turing the World War might have ended very differently for the british and Europe.  
Someone should definitely get on the list for the invention of the transistor, but I’m not sure who. There were many people involved.

1. Gutenberg
2. Isaac Newton
3. James Watt
4. Tsai Lun
5. Louis Pasteur
6. Aristotle
7. Mohammed
8. Euclid
9. Augustus Caesar
10. Einstein  
I’m definitely biased toward the scientists and engineers. Paul and Jesus would both be somewhere very close to the top 10.

As for the leaders, I think Alexander is somewhat overrated historically, though still very important. Sure he was a supreme conqueror, but his reign was very short lived, and his empire didn’t outlive him. The romans idolized him as a perfect leader, and that’s partly to blame for Alexander’s legendary status. Alexander’s most significant contribution was spreading greek culture to the east. Without that he would be just another conqueror, and history has plenty of those.

The Roman Empire on the other hand is very influential in the history of European Civilization, and European countries have had a huge impact on the entire world since the 1500s.

Many of the languages, modes of government, justice systems and cultures of Europe bear the legacy of the Roman Empire. Roman roads were still an important mode of travel for a long time after the Empire had collapsed, and a large part of the world still uses the latin alphabet. Augustus is important because unlike Alexander, he acted to build a lasting Empire. That’s not to say the Roman Empire was necessarily good, as it involved many terrible things, but influence isn’t a moral judgment.

Thanks again for organizing this! It was great fun, and made me re-evaluate my opinion on several historical people.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Measure\_for\_Measure](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/measure_for_measure/32/557_2.png) [@Measure\_for\_Measure](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Measure_for_Measure)\
**Post date:** [July 4, 2010, 12:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-100-most-influential-people-try-the-third/536080/709 "2010-07-04T00:20:42Z")

</div>

Help fight my ignorance regarding Caesar. In [218BC](http://www.roman-empire.net/maps/empire/extent/218bc.html), the Roman Empire was roughly modern day Italy. By [100 BC](http://www.roman-empire.net/maps/empire/extent/100bc-2.html) it covered parts of Spain, southern France, Tunisia in North Africa, and parts of Yugoslavia, Turkey and Iraq. [Caesar conquered](http://www.roman-empire.net/maps/empire/extent/caesar.html) most of Spain, Portugal, France and more of North Africa. Afterwards [Rome kept expanding](http://www.roman-empire.net/maps/empire/extent/augustus.html).

I had thought of Caesar as just another successful Roman Emperor. Wasn’t Rome’s expansion in some way inevitable? Is Caesar a place-holder for the Roman Empire or did he play a more individual role? Wikipedia notes that he played a critical role in transforming the Roman Republic into the Roman Empire. Ookay, but it seems to me that Rome was plenty expansionary both before and after his rule.

**sohvan** and **septimus** : Nice contrast of the Greek and Roman empires. Looks like we might want to downgrade poor Alexander.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JohnT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnt/32/15048_2.png) [@JohnT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JohnT)\
**Post date:** [October 23, 2010, 4:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-100-most-influential-people-try-the-third/536080/710 "2010-10-23T16:16:47Z")

</div>

Fresh brains!

Anyway, I’m moving next week and while yanking books out of the bookcase what do I see but my copy of _Life Magazine’s “The 100 Most Important Events and People of the Past 1,000 Years”_ (which was published in 1999). While the timeline scope is more limited than that in this game, I thought it might be of interest to participants of this thread…

People first:

1. Carolus Linnaus
2. Kwame Nkruman
3. Ibn Khaldun
4. Catherin De Medicis
5. Jacques Cousteau
6. Santiage Ramon Y Cajal
7. John Von Neumann
8. Leo Tolstoy
9. Roger Bannister
10. Nelson Mandela
11. Walt Disney
12. Claudio Mointeverdi
13. Elizabeth I
14. Theodor Herzl
15. Hokusai
16. Helen Keller
17. Raphael
18. Suan B. Anthony
19. Edwin Hubble
20. Phineas T. Barnum
21. Antione-Laurent Lavoisier
22. Louis Jacques Mande Daguerre
23. Pablo Picasso
24. Peter the Great
25. Andrea Palladio
26. Marie Curie
27. Adam Smith
28. Jalal Ad-Din Ar-Rumi
29. Simone De Beauvoir
30. Ibn Sina
31. Michael Faraday
32. Louis Armstrong
33. Matteo Ricci
34. Cao Xeuqin
35. Jane Addams
36. Firam Maxim
37. Pope Innocent III
38. John Harrison
39. Guido of Arezzo
40. William the Conqueror
41. Otto Von Bismarck
42. Fan Kuan
43. Immanuel Kant
44. Nikola Tesla
45. Louis XIV
46. Frederick Douglass
47. Joan of Arc
48. Niels Bohr
49. Jean-Jacques Rousseau
50. John D. Rockefeller
51. Dante
52. Marco Polo
53. Akbar
54. John Locke
55. Gregor Mendel
56. Zhu Xi
57. Ibn Battuta
58. Joseph Lister
59. Hernan Cortes
60. Florence Nightingale
61. John Calvin
62. Samuel Morse
63. Suleyman the Magnificent
64. Vasco Da Gama
65. Michaelangelo
66. Abraham Lincoln
67. Thomas Aquinas
68. Ludwig Van Beethoven
69. Rene Descartes
70. Alexander Graham Bell
71. Martin Luther King Jr
72. Vladimir Lenin
73. Mao Zedong
74. Marconi
75. Mary Wollstonecraft
76. Simon Bolivar
77. James Madison
78. Kublai Khan
79. Mohandas Gandhi
80. Albert Einstein
81. The Wright Brothers
82. Copernicus
83. Karl Marx
84. Richard Arkwright
85. Sigmund Freud
86. Henry Ford
87. Zheng He
88. Adolf Hitler
89. Napoleon
90. Shakespeare
91. Thomas Jefferson
92. Charles Darwin
93. Louis Pastuer
94. Magellan
95. Isaac Newton
96. Leonardo Da Vinci
97. Galileo
98. Martin Luther
99. Christopher Columbus
100. Thomas Edison

Interesting that the discoverers ranked much more highly than we at the SDMB placed them… in my opinion, they’re ranked WAY too high on the _Life_ list. Edison is a very surprising #1, and the absence of Watt (and Adam Smith) is quite bizarre.

Unfortunately, I clicked “Post Message” before I could give you _Life’s_ reasoning, which you will find in the next post…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JohnT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnt/32/15048_2.png) [@JohnT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JohnT)\
**Post date:** [October 23, 2010, 4:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-100-most-influential-people-try-the-third/536080/711 "2010-10-23T16:28:41Z")

</div>

Here is _Life’s_ reasoning behind the 100 people list…

> [@](#):
>
> **The 100 People Who Made the Millennium**
> 
> What, no Babe Ruth? How, you ask, could a list of the millennium’s most important people not include the Sultan of Swat? Plenty of other monarchs failed to make the lineup as well. To get on this team, a person had to change more than a corner of the world - he or she had to divert the great stream of human history, alter our perceptions perceptible. A runner edged out Ruth (and Jackie Robinson) by setting a new standard for any owner of two legs. You’ll find his name at No. 92 on the the following list, which ranks the honorees by importance. Many names will be familiar from the events section, but not all. A few - Watt, Koch, Gutenberg - appear there but not here. Some of history’s paramount figures are remembered more for a single accomplishment (such as ushering in the age of print) than for the force of their personalities.
> 
> Though the actions of the individuals who made the list affected all kinds of people, they are an overwhelmingly male, pale bunch. All but 17 are of European extraction; only 10 are women. This reflects not the biases of LIFE’s editors and expert advisers, but the sociopolitical realities of the past thousand years. For most of that time, as Virginia Woolf noted, women have served largely as “looking-glasses… reflecting the figure of man at twice its natural size.” Likewise, the millenniums most conspicuous historical movement has been the rise of the West - which means that Westerners, often borrowing ideas and technology from other peoples, have doen a disproportionate amount of global moving and shaking. The next millennium’s list of planet-rattlers promises to look strikingly different.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JohnT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnt/32/15048_2.png) [@JohnT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JohnT)\
**Post date:** [October 23, 2010, 4:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-100-most-influential-people-try-the-third/536080/712 "2010-10-23T16:58:49Z")

</div>

Here is _Life_ Magazines top-100 Events of the last Millennium:

1. The Gregorian Calendar
2. Elvis and the birth of Rock 'n Roll
3. Finding the Rosetta Stone
4. The Olympics
5. Publishing of Don Quixote
6. The First Museum (England, 1659)
7. Sinking of Spanish Armada
8. Development of Anathesia
9. The Ottoman Empire
10. Haiti’s Revolution (1791)
11. Invention of Plastic
12. The Mali Empire
13. Modern Art
14. Commodore Perry in Japan
15. Indian Independence
16. Saving Aristotle (Ibn Rushd translating works from Greek to Arabic)
17. Development of Accounting
18. The First Novel (The Tale of Genji)
19. Modern Advertising (Coca-Cola highlighted)
20. 17th Century South American Silver Rush
21. Suez Canal
22. Rise of the Welfare State
23. Coffee
24. Invention of the Elevator
25. Discovery of DNA
26. Chartes (and the European Gothic movement of the medieval era)
27. Simon Bolivar’s wars of liberation
28. Development of concept of “Fashion”
29. Development of Workers Rights
30. Angkor Wat
31. Rise of Environmental movement (Silent Spring highlighted)
32. Development of science of Anatomy (Vesalius)
33. Pentacostalism
34. Invention of Sewing Machine
35. Splendor of Tenochtitlan
36. Development of Perspective in art
37. The Long March
38. Invention of Dynamite
39. Bessemer Steel
40. Invention of X-Rays
41. Invention of the Toilet (Modern Sanitation)
42. The First Newspaper
43. Development of Rubber
44. Development of Birth Control
45. The First Restaurant
46. Childhood Found (invention of concept of childhood as a separate stage of development, 17th century)
47. Introduction of Tobacco in global marketplace
48. Invention of Frozen Foods
49. Development of accurate clocks and watches
50. The US Civil War
51. Invention of the University
52. Discovery of the Circulation of Blood
53. Invention of Canned Foods
54. The Oil Industry
55. Water Purification
56. Russia turning Communist
57. Invention of the Microscope
58. Development of the Well-Tempered Scale (JS Bach)
59. Discovery of Laws of Heredity
60. Invention of the Telegraph
61. Development of Women’s Rights
62. Discovery and Transplantation of the Potato
63. Marx meeting Engels
64. Invention of Photography
65. Theory of Relativity (E=MC^2)
66. Shakespeare’s Plays
67. The French Revolution
68. Landing of Men on Moon
69. Invention of Motion Pictures
70. Freud and the invention of Psychology
71. Invention of the Transistor
72. Ghengis Khan runs rampant
73. Tea
74. Invention of Heavier-Than-Air flight
75. WW1
76. Invention of Radio and wireless communication
77. Invention of the Railroads
78. Discovery of Gravity Theory by Newton
79. Invention of Penicillin
80. The Black Plague
81. Invention of the Telephone
82. Magna Carta
83. The Crusades
84. Ford’s Model T
85. Invention of Atomic Bombs
86. Darwin Develops Theory of Evolution
87. Television
88. Vaccinations
89. Slavery, and the efforts to end it
90. Thomas Edison’s career (electric lights, especially, but also mentioned in #32)
91. Invention of the Compass and its aid to mariners
92. Hitler/WW2
93. Declaration of Independence
94. Development of Gunpowder Weapons
95. Development of Germ Theory
96. Galileo’s Telescope
97. The Industrial Revolution
98. The Protestant Reformation
99. The Discovery of America by Columbus
100. The Invention of the Printing Press

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JohnT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnt/32/15048_2.png) [@JohnT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JohnT)\
**Post date:** [May 21, 2021, 7:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-100-most-influential-people-try-the-third/536080/713 "2021-05-21T19:15:51Z")

</div>

Guys and gals, it’s been over a decade since I ran this game and am wondering if there is an interest in doing a new one, this time with an updated list (say, we lop off the bottom 25 of our 2010 list and add other, more worthy people)?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-100-most-influential-people-try-the-third/536080.md?page=35)
