What? No takers?
[sub]relavant link[/sub]
What? No takers?
[sub]relavant link[/sub]
OK, I’m in.
Hang on a sec…
Bunny rabbits. Cute ones, at that. Unfeasibly fluffy. Playing in marshmallow fields.
It’s ok guys, you can come into this thread now.
Sorry.
(hurls into the dunny again)
Sorry. Geez, why did you have to regurgitate this thread? I mean, like, really, ONCE IS ENOUGH ALREADY.
And bugger-you Loaded for lulling me into a false sense of security.
Sorry k. My shout at the Espy next time.
Hey TLD, if it’s your shout, then I’ll have a triple bourbon, straight, with a quadruple bourbon chaser. Thanks!!
But don’t ask the bar-chicks at the Espy for such a concoction…
This may set the record for TMI-thread-title.
OpalCat, this thread -besides vulgar- is unnecessary. You link to an existing thread, which is at the front page of MPSIMS at the time I write this. It does not need any promo threads. Conversely, adding a “relevant link” does not a valid thread make.
Furthermore, the wording of your thread title is clearly aimed at luring people in. This practice is frowned upon, as you well know.
In addition, it would appear that you are not aware of our recent policy to try and raise the tone of the board a bit. The latest version of our registration agreement can be read here.
Since some of your postings would definitely fall in the “vulgar” category, I’d say the new rules are especially relevant. Please try and keep abreast of our policies as they are announced in ATMB.
We’re not complete prudes, you know. I’ll leave open a “zit popping lovers” thread when it seems to amuse or apply to a lot of posters. I can laugh at a thread called “I’ve got serious wood!”, which then turns out to be about building a shed.
But sheer vulgarity, just for the sake of it?
No.
Don’t do this again. This thread is closed.