# The Aesthetical Jesus - Part IV **URL:** \ **Category:** Great Debates\ **Created:** [June 16, 2009, 1:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-aesthetical-jesus-part-iv/499898 "2009-06-16T01:16:14Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 59
**Author:** ![tomndebb](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/b9e5f3/32.png) [@tomndebb](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tomndebb)\ **Post date:** [July 2, 2009, 12:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-aesthetical-jesus-part-iv/499898/59 "2009-07-02T00:19:34Z")
> [@Fenris](#): > > You brought up the…damn, I hate that I can’t say “lies”…pernicious and factually incorrect statements here, I’ll deal with them here. And why do you have some sort of need to call the statements lies? It is not as though Liberal was creating a screed to condemn Judaism. He mentioned one issue, in passing, that does not appear to be central to his own discussion. I have no problem with anyone pointing out that his dismissal of John’s use of the phrase is not in accord with the majority of scholarship. Once that point has been made, however, there is no point in hijacking the thread–ore violating the rules of the forum–simply to harp on that matter. You’ve made you point, now back off of the hijack. Your issue is really irrelevant to the thread. > [@akennett](#): > > Ah yes, the last refuge of the dishonest debater and internet coward, the cry of “thread shitting!” Pointing out where you’ve gone wrong in your execution, whether or not it conforms to your wishes about which areas are open to investigations, is not thread shitting. And if you have some deep-seated need to hurl insults, yoiu can open up your own thread in the BBQ Pit to hurl them. = = = Look, this series of threads has gone on for a couple of months, now. The particxipation in each thread has been --- _[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-aesthetical-jesus-part-iv/499898)._