I would like to ask about an episode from the first season - probably Episode 2 or 3.
Phillip had taken his (approx 12 year old) daughter Paige to a mall. They got slightly separated but Phillip remained close enough that he could still see what she was doing. She was approached by a man (approx 30 years old) who had his arm around a very young girl (maybe approx 13 years old) and he was treating this girl as if she was a romantic interest and definitely not his daughter. When he saw Paige, he started sweet talking her and seemed interested in her. It appeared that if Phillip had not intervened, he would have tried to get Paige’s phone number or tried to pick her up or tried something that no father would ever allow. In fact, because of the way he was behaving, most fathers would’ve wanted to do some harm to this guy.
Anyway, later on, Phillip went to this man’s house and beat the snot out of him. It was definitely very satisfying to watch Phillip beat the snot out of this creep. But it left me feeling a little disturbed about one aspect and I’d like to ask about that.
I’m not complaining this episode was unrealistic. It was definitely unrealistic. But this is a TV show and as such, it’s not really supposed to be realistic. But I still want to ask a question.
This question is directed towards people with experience in self-defense or mixed martial arts techniques. Perhaps people who have significant training in a martial art or in some other form of combat experience. I have read that martial arts experts say that physical violence should be avoided at all costs and should only be used as a last resort. It is said that when you resort to physical violence, you have lost the conflict.
My question is that even if someone has expert level training in physical combat, isn’t it always possible that if they decide to beat the snot out of someone that they just may well come up against someone who will beat them instead?
It seems to me that in this situation, even though Phillip has been trained and possesses expert-level fighting ability, the odds are still close to 50-50 that the other man may also have been trained and been able to beat him. Or, worse, the other fellow may have been carrying a gun and he may have been able to pull it out and shoot Phillip dead. He may even have been a cop (although the odds are small) and then it would have been very difficult for Phillip’s family to get any justice.
So, I’d like to know. If someone possesses expert level combat experience, does it make sense to do what Phillip did? Or wouldn’t it be better to let the police handle this or find some other way to handle this.
FYI, Phillip did wear a disguise so that his victim would likely not have recognized he was the same person from the mall. But I don’t know why that is important to the story.
I don’t care that Phillip behaved in a way that was not terribly realistic. I’d just like to know how someone with expert combat training would have handled this incident. Would you try to go to his home and beat the snot out of him? Phillip didn’t even use the element of surprise. I would have approached the guy from behind so he wouldn’t have seen me coming. But Philip didn’t do that.
I would have loved to beat the snot out of this guy. But I probably would have arranged for some friends who were armed to come with me - just in case he gets the upper hand. Or I would have contacted a lawyer and asked the lawyer to contact the police to handle this. There are several reasons why it is much better to let a lawyer contact the police instead of contacting the police directly (one of which is that the guy may have been a policeman).