# The Biden Administration - the first 1,500 days \[NOT an Afghanistan discussion\]

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-biden-administration-the-first-1-500-days-not-an-afghanistan-discussion/925057>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [November 8, 2020, 3:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-biden-administration-the-first-1-500-days-not-an-afghanistan-discussion/925057 "2020-11-08T15:09:18Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 1218

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Max\_S](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/46a35a/32.png) [@Max\_S](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Max_S)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2021, 12:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-biden-administration-the-first-1-500-days-not-an-afghanistan-discussion/925057/1218 "2021-10-01T00:48:23Z")

</div>

It is my opinion that so long as the Senate has the opportunity to set the rules at least once per session with a majority vote, that provision of the Constitution is satisfied.

And I once tried (and failed) to debate this subject, if you are interested in continuing the discussion I ask you to respond here:

> [@Do Senate rules violate the U.S. Constitutional provision which says the Senate may determine its own rules?](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-senate-rules-violate-the-u-s-constitutional-provision-which-says-the-senate-may-determine-its-own-rules/944013):
>
> Continuing the discussion from [Please explain your Senate rules to me](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-explain-your-senate-rules-to-me/943882/33): ~Max

~Max

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-biden-administration-the-first-1-500-days-not-an-afghanistan-discussion/925057)._