# The Biden Administration - the first 1,500 days \[NOT an Afghanistan discussion\]

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-biden-administration-the-first-1-500-days-not-an-afghanistan-discussion/925057>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [November 8, 2020, 3:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-biden-administration-the-first-1-500-days-not-an-afghanistan-discussion/925057 "2020-11-08T15:09:18Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 484

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/7cd45c/32.png) [@Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Elendil_s_Heir)\
**Post date:** [March 14, 2021, 3:49am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-biden-administration-the-first-1-500-days-not-an-afghanistan-discussion/925057/484 "2021-03-14T03:49:19Z")

</div>

> [@ThelmaLou](#):
>
> > [@Guest-starring\_Id](#):
> >
> > …I’m convinced JB will not, _at all_ , have that avenue for ‘reaching out’.
> 
> Nor would “Yang, Warren, Booker, Harris, Buttigieg, and Sanders.”
> 
> > [@Guest-starring\_Id](#):
> >
> > …I can think of at least five or six candidates who would have turned out to have been a **more effective** chief executive.
> 
> My bold.
> 
> “More effective”?? Not a chance. Not to mention, JB has been President for FIFTY DAYS.
> 
> But you’re right. This belongs in its own thread, not here.

Here ya go: [How, if at all, would any of the other 2020 Dem candidates be doing better than President Biden?](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-if-at-all-would-any-of-the-other-2020-dem-candidates-be-doing-better-than-president-biden/937864)

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-biden-administration-the-first-1-500-days-not-an-afghanistan-discussion/925057)._