Airman: *A conservative is not, and should not, be considered a Bush defender by default. […] Do you have any idea how tiring that is? Any at all? Oh, of course you do, because according to you in some other post of yours I read a few hours ago all conservatives equate liberals with traitors. *
There’s a very substantial difference between those two cases, though. It is much more natural and reasonable to equate conservatives with Bush defenders than it is to equate liberals with traitors. I’m not saying it’s correct, of course—and certainly, as you note, when a particular conservative poster explicitly says they don’t support Bush, it’s not polite to keep on assuming that they do. But it’s certainly a much more logical generalization to make.
For one thing, most conservatives do in fact support Bush—at least, somebody gave him 50-odd percent of the vote, and I know it wasn’t us liberals. But the vast, vast, overwhelming majority of liberals are not traitors.
For another thing, no liberal is publicly laying claim to the label “traitor”, and vice versa. I acknowledge that some actual traitors to the US may certainly be liberal, but they are definitely not advertising their treasonous stance.
But Bush has got his paw prints* all over the labels “conservative” and “Republican”. We see the President of the United States, backed by the full might of his political and PR machinery, incessantly asserting that he does indeed stand for conservatism and the Republican Party. That’s a fairly powerful message.
So assuming that “conservative = Bush supporter”, while certainly not universally valid, is definitely much more reasonable than assuming that “liberal = traitor”. Conservatives are just going to have to accept that it’s going to take a lot of work to dissociate themselves from the “Bush supporter” label.
*Disclaimer: Not intended as a Bush-bash. I repudiate the suggestion that the President is, or ought to be compared to, any animal having paws instead of hands, and I have never made such a comparison. I just happen to like the phrase “paw prints”. Paw prints paw prints! 