And took all the W’s off the keyboards! CLASSLESS LIBERAL VANDALISM!
Didn’t the Democrats only gain Congress in 2007?
Not even then; 60 votes are required to control the Senate, and the Dems have only 51.
The Angry Left got swallowed up by the Angry Middle 40% of Americans.
The idea that people really want some kind of bipartisanship is a myth. It’s also non-sensical. People want an end to Neoconism and everything it has wrought. They want accountability.
It’s actually pretty simple.
The GOP never had 60 Senators. Guess they never got any legislation passed during the Bush Administration.
Y’know, I’m just fucking tired of this unsubstantiated crap.
Define this ‘angry left.’ Produce examples. I bet I’d have no trouble matching your ‘angry left’ with an angrier, and more visible, angry right.
For some reason, only the left’s anger is worthy of comment. Fuck-all if I know why.
Well, Coulter, as quoted in the OP, was complaining about being “accused of being a racist, sexist, homophobe.” Whether these charges are just or not as applied to her and others on the right is another discussion; the point is they’re sick of “the politics of personal destruction” on those terms.
I hope the “angry left” will still be around no matter who wins this – but its anger will be shifted from cultural issues to economic and class issues. There’s a winning formula! (Gays, just be patient, you’ll get married eventually; but people are struggling to make ends meet now.)
51% to pass legislation. 60% to overcome the veto from an obstuctionist Executive branch looking to push a failed agenda over the well being of the nation as a whole.
No, 60% to overcome the constant threat of a filibuster from the party that only a few years ago had plans to declare the filibuster unconstitutional when it kept them from getting everything they wanted.
I’d love to respond more, but it’s hard to type between bouts of laughter over Ann Coulter bitching about “the acrimony of political discourse”.
I disagree.
I disagree. If Person A calls people ‘faggots,’ and Person B calls Person A a ‘homophobe’ on account of that, I would regard this as a qualitative difference. One’s making personal attacks; the other’s accurately describing the nature of a person who makes such attacks.
Equating the two is completely off the mark.
I’m sure she chose book titles such as ‘Godless’ and ‘Treason’ out of her deep respect for her political adversaries. 
I see the unwritten assumption in the article is that if elected Hillary will continue the Kos hate mongering and isle division will continue. Do you guys think this is true?
Anybody see a problem here?
Well, I think so, Brain, but if you bite a sound, do you have to chew it? Narf!
Ah, yes. The party that once decried the “Tyranny of the Minority” and which has now broken the records for the most Senate filibusters. And they’re only halfway through the 110th Congress.
Only if you don’t bother to read the very next sentence of that first post:
You misspelled “truth”.
If you don’t, you end up with chunky sound turds.
When the Republicans are in power the far left writes whiny posts in blogs, when the Dems are in power the far right blows up abortion clinics and buildings in Oklahoma.
Are you blind? In the VERY NEXT SENTENCE I said,
Jesus. At least read my messages before you fly off the handle, will you?
That goes for you too, Elvis, seeing as you had to jump on the bandwagon.
I’m not painting any side as anything. In fact, in the VERY SAME MESSAGE I said that the root problem was the Balkanization of media, which is pushing everyone into their own camps where they don’t even read the same news any more.