I don’t think the facts are disputed, which is that Sussmann presented material that originated from the Hillary campaign without disclosing it. They just didn’t have the evidence to show that he was witholding ‘material’ information under the legal definition of what is or isn’t ‘material’.
But if the Hillary campaign was responsible for much of the ‘Russian collusion’ material that caused years of investigations, that’s still really bad. But I don’t know if Durham will be able to prove that at all, or prove that it was fake. We’ll know when it wraps up.