# The "Far Left" is already being demonized

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-far-left-is-already-being-demonized/924994>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [November 7, 2020, 5:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-far-left-is-already-being-demonized/924994 "2020-11-07T17:53:25Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 28

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Boudicca90](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/boudicca90/32/16818_2.png) [@Boudicca90](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Boudicca90)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2020, 7:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-far-left-is-already-being-demonized/924994/543 "2020-11-19T19:52:52Z")

</div>

There is nothing “crazy” about Bernie’s plan at all, I find it pretty reasonable. Then again, what I ultimately want is nationalization and socialization of the medical and pharmaceutical industries, so I see his plan as a reasonable compromise in the system we currently have. And it can absolutely work and gain mass support if we sell it right, or even want to sell it at all. The longer we wait, the more people will die when they don’t have to, or the more people will be forced to go into poverty or bankruptcy.

And there are other issues like Green New Deal that we absolutely need right now. We need to start taking drastic action to mitigate or reverse our damage to this planet. The events of this past year have shown that we are running out of time and can’t wait for incremental change as politicians on both sides are capitulating with capitalists who still have to make a profit.

These are not issues I am willing to budge on.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DeadTreasSecretaries](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/deadtreassecretaries/32/4817_2.png) [@DeadTreasSecretaries](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DeadTreasSecretaries)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2020, 8:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-far-left-is-already-being-demonized/924994/544 "2020-11-19T20:05:05Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> Is Joes plan great? Nope. But it is a baby step. Free ACA for the poor, and the age for medicare lowered. Next we extent both, redefine poor to include those lower middle class struggling, and lover medicare gae by another five years. And so forth. Sooner or later, _everyone_ has healthcare.

The funny thing is that Biden’s plan is actually much more aggressive than what you’re characterizing it as. His plan includes a public option available to people regardless of whether they’re able to get health insurance through an employer, a market or have no other options. It also includes automatic enrollment for people when the lose their private care.

I really wish Biden had played up how much of a big deal this would be if he was able to enact it. I didn’t watch all of the debates, but I’m pretty sure the only time the public option came up was when Biden was asked whether it would eliminate private insurance and he said something like “it would only be available for very poor people.” I think he was trying to indicate that it would only be free for poor people; other people would have to option to buy in, but it sounded like a major gaffe to me at the time. It ended up not making any waves, I guess because the Dems never spent any time ginning up support for it in the first place. And it’s really frustrating because the public option actually polls well in spite of how much the Dems run away from it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Boudicca90](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/boudicca90/32/16818_2.png) [@Boudicca90](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Boudicca90)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2020, 8:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-far-left-is-already-being-demonized/924994/545 "2020-11-19T20:47:49Z")

</div>

> [@Miller](#):
>
> Gay marriage also went from something that was widely opposed to something that is generally accepted, in a shorter span of time than support for interracial marriage. And it did that while being a major factor in electoral politics.

Yep, as someone affected I was giving up hope for any nationwide change until the Supreme Court weighed in and affirmed our rights. And the same kind of arguments were made by the right back then, that it should have been up to the will of the majority. When it doesn’t matter how it was done, only that it was.

I can’t just wait around for majority approval for my rights to be respected.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Deeg](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/deeg/32/2955_2.png) [@Deeg](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Deeg)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2020, 8:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-far-left-is-already-being-demonized/924994/546 "2020-11-19T20:53:01Z")

</div>

Maybe I’m understanding it wrong but you seem claim that it was moderates/centrists who lost the election for Clinton. If that’s the correct understanding then why did the moderates vote for Biden?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Whack-a-Mole](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/whack-a-mole/32/141_2.png) [@Whack-a-Mole](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Whack-a-Mole)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2020, 8:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-far-left-is-already-being-demonized/924994/547 "2020-11-19T20:59:11Z")

</div>

Moderates/centrists certainly voted for Clinton.

Moderates/centrists bailed in large numbers for Obama (25% IIRC).

Progressives reliably voted for Obama and Clinton and now Biden.

So it is hard to make a case that progressives are the problem.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ISiddiqui](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/97f17d/32.png) [@ISiddiqui](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ISiddiqui)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2020, 9:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-far-left-is-already-being-demonized/924994/548 "2020-11-19T21:18:04Z")

</div>

> [@DeadTreasSecretaries](#):
>
> I really wish Biden had played up how much of a big deal this would be if he was able to enact it.

I think it was part of shoring up the ACA. And, to be honest, I think he’s going to have his hands full trying to restore all the holes the Trump Administration has punched into the ACA. I do think he wanted to leverage how popular all the aspects of the ACA are (ending pre-existing condition exclusions, lifetime limits), as opposed to getting drawn into “well, how much will this cost” sort of game.

Though I do wonder how things would look different (for the better, IMO) if they could have gotten one more vote for the public option back in 2009-10.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Exapno\_Mapcase](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/exapno_mapcase/32/1051_2.png) [@Exapno\_Mapcase](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Exapno_Mapcase)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2020, 9:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-far-left-is-already-being-demonized/924994/549 "2020-11-19T21:18:10Z")

</div>

Could we see some actual numbers for these claims?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Whack-a-Mole](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/whack-a-mole/32/141_2.png) [@Whack-a-Mole](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Whack-a-Mole)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2020, 9:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-far-left-is-already-being-demonized/924994/550 "2020-11-19T21:39:20Z")

</div>

Sure:

> To answer the question that many Clinton supporters may be asking: By this data, yes — there are enough of those Sanders-Trump voters who could have potentially swung the election toward Clinton and away from Trump.
> 
> Specifically, if the Sanders-Trump voters in [Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania](https://twitter.com/b_schaffner/status/900123993897926661) had voted for Clinton, or even stayed home on Election Day, those states would have swung to Clinton, and she would have won 46 more electoral votes, putting her at 278 — enough to win, in other words.
> 
> But then, it’s not as simple as that. First off, this counterfactual world in which these voters didn’t vote for Trump rests on a few _ifs_ . _If_ the Sanders-Trump voters in these three states had defected and _if_ nothing else had happened to somehow take electoral votes from Clinton elsewhere and _if_ this survey is correct … then yes, Clinton would have won. (Some would also argue that _if_ Clinton had campaigned more in the so-called “blue wall” states, she also could have picked up more votes.)
> 
> A more important caveat, perhaps, is that other statistics suggest that this level of “defection” isn’t all that out of the ordinary. Believing that all those Sanders voters somehow should have been expected to not vote for Trump may be to misunderstand how primary voters behave.
> 
> For example, Schaffner tells NPR that around 12 percent of Republican primary voters (including 34 percent of Ohio Gov. John Kasich voters and 11 percent of Florida Sen. Marco Rubio voters) ended up voting for Clinton. And according to [one 2008 study,](https://sites.duke.edu/hillygus/files/2014/06/hendersonhillygustompsonPOQ.pdf)around 25 percent of Clinton primary voters in that election ended up voting for Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., in the general. (In addition, the data showed 13 percent of McCain primary voters ended up voting for Obama, and 9 percent of Obama voters ended up voting for McCain — perhaps signaling something that swayed voters between primaries and the general election, or some amount of error in the data, or both.)
> 
> [SOURCE](https://www.npr.org/2017/08/24/545812242/1-in-10-sanders-primary-voters-ended-up-supporting-trump-survey-finds)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2020, 9:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-far-left-is-already-being-demonized/924994/551 "2020-11-19T21:55:24Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> It can not possibly, under any scenario, pass congress. Totally impossible.
> 
> I also dont care for his deliberate misnaming his plan

I wonder if the reason his totally reasonable plan could never pass congress has something to do with the way you (and others) portray the left and the right in the US?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2020, 9:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-far-left-is-already-being-demonized/924994/552 "2020-11-19T21:56:01Z")

</div>

> [@Whack-a-Mole](#):
>
> > [@DrDeth](#):
> >
> > It can not possibly, under any scenario, pass congress. Totally impossible.
> 
> Can you name any plan…ANY plan…that would pass congress intact?

Not the ACA, that’s for sure!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Whack-a-Mole](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/whack-a-mole/32/141_2.png) [@Whack-a-Mole](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Whack-a-Mole)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2020, 9:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-far-left-is-already-being-demonized/924994/553 "2020-11-19T21:57:13Z")

</div>

> [@Babale](#):
>
> Not the ACA, that’s for sure!

I don’t know if you are joking or not.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![crowmanyclouds](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/crowmanyclouds/32/19884_2.png) [@crowmanyclouds](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/crowmanyclouds)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2020, 10:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-far-left-is-already-being-demonized/924994/554 "2020-11-19T22:01:23Z")

</div>

> [@Babale](#):
>
> I wonder if the reason his totally reasonable plan could never pass congress has something to do with the way you (and others) portray the left and the right in the US?

Could you be a little less clear here?  
Thanks in advance!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2020, 10:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-far-left-is-already-being-demonized/924994/555 "2020-11-19T22:01:35Z")

</div>

I am not – the gutted version of the ACA we got is a disgrace, I wouldn’t call the bill that passed “intact”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Whack-a-Mole](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/whack-a-mole/32/141_2.png) [@Whack-a-Mole](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Whack-a-Mole)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2020, 10:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-far-left-is-already-being-demonized/924994/556 "2020-11-19T22:03:07Z")

</div>

Agreed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2020, 10:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-far-left-is-already-being-demonized/924994/557 "2020-11-19T22:04:36Z")

</div>

My point is that DrDeth is here crowing about how nuts and radically to the left the Sanders proposal is, but then he admitted that it’s actually not a crazy idea at all; it is just viewed that way by the Republicans in congress and therefore would never pass.

My question is whether this is because the Sanders proposal is ACTUALLY a crazy unworkable idea, or if it is viewed as much crazier than it is due to the intentional undermining of the idea by people on the Right, a process to which DrDeth is also contributing by swallowing whole the “radical far left idea” narrative and parroting it here.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chisquirrel](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/6bbea6/32.png) [@Chisquirrel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chisquirrel)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2020, 10:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-far-left-is-already-being-demonized/924994/558 "2020-11-19T22:19:54Z")

</div>

> [@DeadTreasSecretaries](#):
>
> Do you guys think at least some responsibility is on establishment Dems for advocating for their vision of UHC more strongly?

Finkenauer DID actively promote her vision for UHC during her campaign. Didn’t stop AOC and progressives from using her lukewarm feelings towards M4A SPECIFICALLY as the reason she lost.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Whack-a-Mole](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/whack-a-mole/32/141_2.png) [@Whack-a-Mole](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Whack-a-Mole)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2020, 10:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-far-left-is-already-being-demonized/924994/559 "2020-11-19T22:31:49Z")

</div>

What was her version that she promoted?  
(Really asking)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chisquirrel](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/6bbea6/32.png) [@Chisquirrel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chisquirrel)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2020, 10:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-far-left-is-already-being-demonized/924994/560 "2020-11-19T22:37:42Z")

</div>

The short version? Public option.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DeadTreasSecretaries](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/deadtreassecretaries/32/4817_2.png) [@DeadTreasSecretaries](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DeadTreasSecretaries)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2020, 10:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-far-left-is-already-being-demonized/924994/561 "2020-11-19T22:41:55Z")

</div>

Thanks, I hadn’t heard of her until now, but [this clip I found when I googled her](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tCcDpRhA54) is basically what I want to see more of from other Democrats. Obviously it unfortunately wasn’t enough for her. I really wish Biden had laid it out in terms this simple on a national level. It may not have been good enough for this district, but I’d really like to think some of the downballot races would have done better if they had this kind of healthcare messaging, especially if it came both in the local/state races and from Biden.

And obviously it’s just plain wrong to blame someone like that in a swing district for losing because she didn’t support M4A.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DeadTreasSecretaries](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/deadtreassecretaries/32/4817_2.png) [@DeadTreasSecretaries](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DeadTreasSecretaries)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2020, 10:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-far-left-is-already-being-demonized/924994/562 "2020-11-19T22:56:58Z")

</div>

> [@ISiddiqui](#):
>
> I think it was part of shoring up the ACA. And, to be honest, I think he’s going to have his hands full trying to restore all the holes the Trump Administration has punched into the ACA. I do think he wanted to leverage how popular all the aspects of the ACA are (ending pre-existing condition exclusions, lifetime limits), as opposed to getting drawn into “well, how much will this cost” sort of game.

For this discussion I’m just interested in how to campaign on an establishment healthcare plan. I think there are ways to have the argument if it turns into something like “how much will it cost” - I think then you could mention other things in Biden’s plan like subsidies that reduce the cost working/middle class people have to pay, and then mention that we just need the rich to pay there fair share for people who can’t afford insurance on their own. The frustrating thing is it seems like a lot of the moderate Dems - and it has been pointed out to me that there are exceptions - don’t seem to want to have the fight at all.

As far as what could actually happen, we now know with the election results that unless the Democrats win both Georgia races and nuke the filibuster, they’re not going to get any of their legislative agenda passed. The only thing they’ll be able to do is actually fund existing elements in the ACA. I think that it’s still important to campaign on what your vision for the country is - even during the campaign the most optimistic outcome would have still required the Dems to nuke the filibuster to actually pass anything; the main difference would be that it might take 3-5 centrist Dems in the senate to stop things rather than having 1, or even no majority.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-far-left-is-already-being-demonized/924994.md?page=27)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-far-left-is-already-being-demonized/924994.md?page=29)
