This whole story is just so quintessentially 'Merican redneck, it sounds like something The Onion would make up.
I’m waiting for the story where someone says they are concerned that a man sitting next to them might be a terr’ist because they saw him using the metric system.
I am bothered by the attitude that you should get all panicky and contact the authorities if you see or hear something you do not understand. In this case, the woman very well could have asked the professor what he was working on rather than assume it was nefarious. It was, after all, an airplane, not a damn elevator, passengers do sometimes talk to the stranger sitting next to them.
This culture of fear has kind of subverted the common law idea of innocent until proven guilty. If we think something appears to be suspicious in the vaguest way, we are to assume that it is. Sucks to live in fear all the time.
Reminds me of a cat we used to have. She was scared of anything she didn’t understand, which was pretty much everything (she was a white cat with a Siamese build and voice, but most definitely not Siamese brains).
Do you believe the woman left the plane because of global warming? Did you forgot to add the an interesting part to your post or are you just trolling? Did you know that global warming has been occurring since the last ice age?
Hahahaha. I never said I saw a similarity between your examples. That won’t stop you from incorrectly claiming that I did. SOP apparently. :rolleyes:
A woman become concerned, or afraid, of something a fellow passenger did or said. According to Obama’s DHS, it’s suggested that if you see something you should say something. You prefer to advocate for calling the woman a moron or stupid for being afraid and then speaking out. How dare woman speak up when they see something the makes them afraid or concerned? I suggest that wanna-be bullies like youselves make Obama cry.
I’m sorry-I didn’t know you were female.
If so, I would never hold you up as an intellectual example of a typical female, because that would be sexist.
There seems to lots of things that you don’t know, or more importantly, don’t care to know. Gets in the way of Groupthink. You chose to attack a woman for speaking up in situations such as this, in spite of it having been recommended by Obama’s DHS. That makes you a misogynist. Sucks to be you.
As an misogynist, you attack anyone who suggests that there could be more than one side to this story. Personally, I prefer to hear ALL of the versions and facts, unlike you, BEFORE deciding whether a frightened woman is a moron. Still sucks to be you.
Groupthink demands conformity. Groupthink doesn’t tolerate questions. Groupthink condemns free speech. Pressure to conform must be used against persons who dare to ask questions. Questioners must be shouted down. How’s that workin’ out for ya?
Are you really this stupid or is this just performance art? We are attacking her for being a freaking moron thinking math was some sort of blueprint for a terrorist plot. And it is not misogyny because if it were a guy that were this much of a dumbass we’d be ridiculing him just as bad.
There has to be some penalty for passengers who raise this kind of alarm. I understand the TSA “If you see something say something” viewpoint but this kind of behavior needs some penalty to set an example.
Good lord, it’s like arguing with a 14 year old. “Something” doesn’t mean “everything,” okay?
That we’re so mathematically illiterate as a culture that a woman didn’t realize it wasn’t something threatening, that is unfortunate, and perhaps our collective fault.
That we’re so paranoid that several airline employees took her concerns as valid and delayed to investigate at length, instead of saying, “ma’am, it’s math,” and continuing their flight precheck means that, indeed, it’s taking longer than we thought.
The fact that the airlines haven’t come up with a better solution to handle hysterical reports yet is just depressing.