The Forever War - Has anybody read this?

I love the hell out of this book - right up there between Heinlein’s Starship Troopers and Steakley’s Armor. I’m a sucker for anything good with heroes in powered armour.

The part that was excised from the middle - but restored in later editions - involves some side trips that William and Marygay make while on shore leave together on Earth. William interrupts a rape-in-progress while they are in London, and meets Marygay’s parents on an agricultural collective in the American midwest. I seem to recall this piece being available in one of his collections if you got stuck with an edition that leaves it out.

It would take a mighty effort in time and/or money to collect, but there’s a graphic adaption of The Forever War by the Belgian illustrator Marvano that appeared in Heavy Metal and (later) Cheval Noir. It’s pretty faithful to the original - Haldeman himself liked it - and it is very enjoyable to read.

You got the titles backwards, Lightray. Forever Free is the sequel to The Forever War. But I know what you meant, and I whole-heartedly agree with your sentiments.

I’d like to see Forever Peace made into a movie, provided they don’t call it Soldierboyz and cast L.L. Cool J as Julian Class.

I loved “Seasons” as well. I think adapting it with anything less than an R rating would take too much out of the story.

I got the first volume of it through Amazon awhile back, but it’s all in Dutch, I think. Couldn’t find an English translation. Nice artwork, though.

Definitely.

I had a super long & thought out post that got lost when the SDMB signed me out. So, rather than rewrite everything, here’s some final thoughts on the novel now that I’ve read it:

  1. In the context of the entire novel, “Hero” seems out of place, given that it introduces a bunch of ideas which are abandoned as the narrative goes on.

  2. I thought that Haldeman’s commentary on homosexuality was weird & I don’t really know what to make of it. Perhaps it makes more sense to people who lived through the '70’s.

  3. The hard sci-fi stuff (especially the elements dealing with time dilation & relativity) was absolutely fascinating. I could’ve read an entire book based around those ideas (and sans the aforementioned commentary) & been perfectly satisfied.

  4. The ending was great.

I said a helluva lot more in my original post, but it got lost in the SDMB ether. Oh well, c’est la vie.

Mandella doesn’t want to be a hero. He was conscripted. He’d really rather get out, but where would he go? The ending explains that question, of course!

I think Haldeman picked homosexuality as something we could all identify, understand, and relate to - whether it’s one’s lifestyle, something merely tolerated, or absolutely revolting - it would be hard to find someone who doesn’t have a fairly strong opinion about it. But if you came back from a tour of duty - be it in The 'Nam or on Charon - and suddenly everybody back home was homosexual except you, you’d feel pretty out of place too, wouldn’t you?

Watch Gunbuster. If you can make it past the first episode, I bet you will love the hell out of it!

If you’re assigned to protect the stasis field, don’t forget your sword! :wink:

Here’s a taste. The First Gunbuster Science Lesson (humourous but informative pieces that come in between the OVA episodes, of which there are six) explains a bit about faster-than-light travel in the universe in which Gunbuster takes place. The “Tannhaeuser Gate” sounds like it functions an awful lot like Haldeman’s “collapsars”, although it’s actually a nod to Roy Batty’s soliloquy in Blade Runner.

I read it many years ago. I thought it was okay, but nothing special.

Part of my attitude may be the fact that I discovered Worlds and Worlds Apart ca. 1990, so I got to read them as a single story. (They were published in 1981 and 1983, respectively.)

(The cover of my copy of Worlds says “Beginning a major SF trilogy” under the title, and for awhile in that pre-Web era, I searched in vain for the third book, before realizing (a) there wasn’t one, and (b) the story was complete as it was. And after both of those realizations had started to sink in, the third book came out.)

And the thing is, *Worlds Apart *isn’t a sequel anymore than Return of the Jedi is, because Worlds, and The Empire Strikes Back, both end at places where the story clearly isn’t, can’t be, at an end - they’re your classic cliffhangers, really. And just like people argue over whether Jedi is a worthy conclusion to the Star Wars trilogy, or a bit of a disappointment, one can argue that Worlds Apart isn’t as strong an ending as Worlds was a beginning. (I’d disagree, but there are viable arguments on both sides.)

But it’s not a sequel.

Worlds Enough and Time, though, damned sure is. The end of *Worlds Apart *is the end of the story that started in Worlds. The third book may call itself the conclusion of a trilogy, but that’s true in name only. It’s strictly a sequel.

For those who haven’t read Worlds etc., one of the reasons I’m so passionate about it is that, at least IMHO, the element of separation that Haldeman uses so well in The Forever War - well, IMHO, he uses it to even greater effect here, even though this time the gulf between the torn-apart lovers is merely space, and not centuries of time, as it was for Mandella and Marygay.

But you can read it yourselves, and make up your own minds.

Mom hadn’t gone gay. She’d been conditioned to accept living in very small spaces/shared housing, and later she is the example of the society’s indifference to it’s non-productive members.
Or at least, if she was gay I missed it.

His mom mentions she has a girlfriend, who has absented herself so as to not make Mandella uncomfortable.

Actually, it is NOT a sequel..

Found it! “You Can Never Go Back” appears as part of Haldeman’s Dealing in Futures collection, which also begins with the aforementioned (and quite excellent) short story Seasons.

Yep, we covered that.

A Canticle for Leibowitz comes to mind.

I reread it, on the strength of the comments in this thread.

I have to say, I don’t get it. Don’t know what it is I can’t see. It’s an OK story, but to me not a masterpiece. It just sort of gives up at the end. Then, in the the epilog, the struggles of the characters gets turned into a movie. How very meta, Mr Author. Seemed like a long way to go just to sort of make a poke at the reader. (And I thought the epilog of All My Sins Remembered was perfect.)

I guess I wanted answers, but it wasn’t an answer-giving type of story.

Forever War
Starship Troopers
Enders Game

I consider those to be the core books of the military sci-fi “must read” list.

I loved all 3, and will re-read at times.

FW was largely written as a response to “Starship Troopers”.

What wasn’t answered? You know what happened to the crew. And the fate of the planet creatures is their exposure to a superior race sealed their fate one way or another.
Which is why in Star Trek they shouldn’t even be using blinds to study people on planets, or surgically altered people to infiltrate. The dangers are too great if it’s the PRIME Directive.