# The Golden Age of the West

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-golden-age-of-the-west/533575>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [March 24, 2010, 3:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-golden-age-of-the-west/533575 "2010-03-24T03:32:13Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![An\_Gadai](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/d6d6ee/32.png) [@An\_Gadai](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/An_Gadai)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2010, 7:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-golden-age-of-the-west/533575/121 "2010-03-29T19:45:12Z")

</div>

> [@The\_Second\_Stone](#):
>
> Your logic is stunning. Thank you for this insight.

Thank you for your comment.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![An\_Gadai](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/d6d6ee/32.png) [@An\_Gadai](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/An_Gadai)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2010, 7:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-golden-age-of-the-west/533575/122 "2010-03-29T19:57:40Z")

</div>

> [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](#):
>
> So what?

In relation to British treatment of Ireland it is relevant, which was the issue I was addressing.

> [@](#):
>
> The views of the people of Eire are immaterial, except in the context of a situation where the people of Northern Ireland have already voted for independence from the UK and/or unification.
> 
> You might as well say India has the right to annex Pakistan because a majority of the combined population of both countries thinks it should.

Does even a significant minority of the population of Pakistan want to unify with India?

I agree with you that the wishes of the people of the Republic of Ireland are _secondary_ to the wishes of those in the North with regard to unification with the Republic or any other political future. However, an artificial border was created splitting an extant nation and leaving a significant part of the population on the wrong side of the border, thus I don’t think the wishes of the people in the Republic are entirely immaterial. Perhaps partition was pragmatic but it didn’t and hasn’t solved the issues of this island and isn’t really what any reasonable person would consider “kissing Irish arse”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2010, 8:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-golden-age-of-the-west/533575/123 "2010-03-29T20:13:10Z")

</div>

> [@An\_Gadai](#):
>
> However, an artificial border was created splitting an extant nation and leaving a significant part of the population on the wrong side of the border, thus I don’t think the wishes of the people in the Republic are entirely immaterial. Perhaps partition was pragmatic but it didn’t and hasn’t solved the issues of this island and isn’t really what any reasonable person would consider “kissing Irish arse”.

That “extant nation” hasn’t been extant since 1175 as a sovereign political entity. As such, its onetime reach is hardly more relevant today than Spanish claims to South America.

So what if it’s an island? Islands are not automatically united political entities any more than peninsulas or drainage basins.

> [@](#):
>
> Does even a significant minority of the population of Pakistan want to unify with India?

Not in any real sense, no - but define _significant._

ETA: I agree with you about the arse-kissing thing. I have no idea what he’s talking about, and really, neither does he.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2010, 8:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-golden-age-of-the-west/533575/124 "2010-03-29T20:14:08Z")

</div>

> [@Rune](#):
>
> 19th century European imperialism and colonialism wasn’t worse or much difference from Assyrian imperialism, or Persian imperialism, Greek, Phoenician, Roman imperialism, Arab imperialism, Turkish imperialism, Aztec, Zulu, etc. On the whole it was much to be preferred for the conquered people than many of the other.

In what fashion? Genocide and slavery under the Europeans was kinder, gentler genocide and slavery? Did the Romans kill people twice?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2010, 8:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-golden-age-of-the-west/533575/125 "2010-03-29T20:15:35Z")

</div>

Well, sort of. I mean, they were Europeans - so the people of modern day Ethiopia got killed once by the Romans and again later on by the Italians.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![An\_Gadai](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/d6d6ee/32.png) [@An\_Gadai](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/An_Gadai)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2010, 8:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-golden-age-of-the-west/533575/126 "2010-03-29T20:33:00Z")

</div>

> [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](#):
>
> That “extant nation” hasn’t been extant since 1175 as a sovereign political entity. As such, its onetime reach is hardly more relevant today than Spanish claims to South America.
> 
> So what if it’s an island? Islands are not automatically united political entities any more than peninsulas or drainage basins.
> 
> Not in any real sense, no - but define _significant._
> 
> ETA: I agree with you about the arse-kissing thing. I have no idea what he’s talking about, and really, neither does he.

Well it was an extant nation in the sense that it formed the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland from 1801. Ireland was a nation within the UK from then up until partition. I didn’t say nation state. Prior to the Act of Union there was also an Irish Parliament.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2010, 8:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-golden-age-of-the-west/533575/127 "2010-03-29T20:54:14Z")

</div>

Yes, but like the current Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly, its power devolved from Westminster and could have been taken away at any time.

If relative autonomy is enough, then you shouldn’t have a problem with _status quo_, after all.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![An\_Gadai](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/d6d6ee/32.png) [@An\_Gadai](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/An_Gadai)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2010, 9:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-golden-age-of-the-west/533575/128 "2010-03-29T21:04:57Z")

</div>

> [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](#):
>
> Yes, but like the current Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly, its power devolved from Westminster and could have been taken away at any time.
> 
> If relative autonomy is enough, then you shouldn’t have a problem with _status quo_, after all.

Well I explained in my post above why I do have a problem with it. A devolved Ireland within the UK might have been the best situation but intransigence on all sides of the argument made that an impossibility and it is not something that is likely to occur again anytime soon.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Second\_Stone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/bbe5ce/32.png) [@The\_Second\_Stone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Second_Stone)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2010, 9:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-golden-age-of-the-west/533575/129 "2010-03-29T21:42:08Z")

</div>

> [@An\_Gadai](#):
>
> Thank you for your comment.

You are most welcome.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Guinastasia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/guinastasia/32/5751_2.png) [@Guinastasia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Guinastasia)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2010, 12:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-golden-age-of-the-west/533575/130 "2010-03-30T00:58:30Z")

</div>

One wonders if **Curtis** has even READ _The Color Purple_. :dubious:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2010, 2:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-golden-age-of-the-west/533575/131 "2010-03-30T02:05:37Z")

</div>

> [@An\_Gadai](#):
>
> Well I explained in my post above why I do have a problem with it. A devolved Ireland within the UK might have been the best situation but intransigence on all sides of the argument made that an impossibility and it is not something that is likely to occur again anytime soon.

Sure, but what’s wrong with a devolved Northern Ireland within the UK?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Martini\_Enfield](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/martini_enfield/32/11123_2.png) [@Martini\_Enfield](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Martini_Enfield)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2010, 3:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-golden-age-of-the-west/533575/132 "2010-03-30T03:55:17Z")

</div>

> [@Der\_Trihs](#):
>
> In what fashion? Genocide and slavery under the Europeans was kinder, gentler genocide and slavery? Did the Romans kill people twice?

I’ve said it before and I’ve said it again: European Colonialism in Africa was, for the most part, well-intentioned. Exceptions exist (Congo Free State, for example) but the British and French and Germans and Portuguese and did _not_ suddenly one day decide to go to Africa, kill all the darkies, and then play a real-life version of _Risk_ with the African continent.\*

The Missionaries (spreading The Word Of The Lord) and Traders arrived to Spread The Word (as God had directed them to do, remember?) and the Traders wanted to _trade_ with the locals. Invariably, tensions arose and they asked for military protection from their respective Governments and before long you’ve got HM Stationer’s Office is sending out for more red cartographic ink and Germany wondering how they ended up with some place called “Tanganyika” when all they wanted was a trading concession with the local ruler.

Two books I highly recommend for anyone looking for a balanced overview of the period are _The Scramble For Africa_ by Thomas Pakenham and _King Leopold’s Ghost_ by Adam Hochschild.

\*And before anyone mentions the Berlin Conference of 1884, European Colonialism/Imperialism in Africa had been going on for a _long_ time before that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2010, 4:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-golden-age-of-the-west/533575/133 "2010-03-30T04:05:45Z")

</div>

> [@Martini\_Enfield](#):
>
> I’ve said it before and I’ve said it again: European Colonialism in Africa was, for the most part, well-intentioned. Exceptions exist (Congo Free State, for example) but the British and French and Germans and Portuguese and did _not_ suddenly one day decide to go to Africa, kill all the darkies, and then play a real-life version of _Risk_ with the African continent.\*

No, they just developed quinine and better weapons so they could do so. And doing things like enslaving people and deliberately spreading dissension among the conquered to keep them weak was anything but benevolent. Judging by their performance in the Americas, the only reason they didn’t genocide most of the population was that the Africans didn’t mostly succumb to smallpox and such, so had a much higher population left.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Martini\_Enfield](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/martini_enfield/32/11123_2.png) [@Martini\_Enfield](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Martini_Enfield)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2010, 4:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-golden-age-of-the-west/533575/134 "2010-03-30T04:28:05Z")

</div>

> [@Der\_Trihs](#):
>
> No, they just developed quinine and better weapons so they could do so. And doing things like enslaving people and deliberately spreading dissension among the conquered to keep them weak was anything but benevolent. Judging by their performance in the Americas, the only reason they didn’t genocide most of the population was that the Africans didn’t mostly succumb to smallpox and such, so had a much higher population left.

Quinine was discovered by one of the Amazonian tribes and brought to Europe by the Jesuits in the 16th or 17th century, as I understand it- long before the African continent was anything more than an outline on European maps with a lot of blank space in the middle.

Africa was colonised centuries after North America, so it’s not really fair to compare 16th Century views on “Indians” with 19th Century views on Natives in Africa IMHO.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2010, 4:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-golden-age-of-the-west/533575/135 "2010-03-30T04:33:38Z")

</div>

> [@Martini\_Enfield](#):
>
> Quinine was discovered by one of the Amazonian tribes and brought to Europe by the Jesuits in the 16th or 17th century, as I understand it- long before the African continent was anything more than an outline on European maps with a lot of blank space in the middle.

It took time for them to come up with a way to produce a good enough version in large enough amounts to keep their armies from dying.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Martini\_Enfield](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/martini_enfield/32/11123_2.png) [@Martini\_Enfield](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Martini_Enfield)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2010, 6:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-golden-age-of-the-west/533575/136 "2010-03-30T06:00:33Z")

</div>

> [@Der\_Trihs](#):
>
> It took time for them to come up with a way to produce a good enough version in large enough amounts to keep their armies from dying.

Look, I’m sorry if you believe that the only reason the Europeans colonised Africa was because they wanted to kill the locals for no particular reason. That’s not how it happened and whilst no-one- not even me- pretends that Colonialism was all about gin slings on the verandah, cricket on weekends, and free kittens for everyone, the simple fact was that Colonialism in Africa was driven by the three Cs- “Christianity, Commerce, and Civilisation”.

Basically, the “White Man’s Burden” was the view that that White people were (by Victorian standards and attitudes) clearly superior to the Africans (after all, if they were so smart, why did they live in [del]igloos[/del] stick huts?) and it was Whitey’s God-mandated duty to share the benefits of Civilisation with his less fortunate (and darker coloured) brethren. It’s a bit hard to “Civilise” dead people, after all.

I know it’s trendy to declare Colonialism to be the Second Worst Thing Ever After Hitler, but the undeniable reality is that the reason we’re all having this conversation in English is because, several centuries ago, the people living in a smallish green island off the coast of Europe looked at a map and said “I wonder what’s over there in that blank spot? Do the people there know how awesome God and Jesus are? Do they have all the neat things we have? And can we make any money out of selling our neat stuff to them?”

Or, to put it another way: If you (as a white person living in pretty much any country outside Europe) think Colonialism was so evil and terrible, then perhaps you should give your house to the local Native Tribe and then emigrate back to whichever country your ancestors hailed from originally. I bet you’re not going to, though, are you? Of course not.

So whether you like it or not, you’re benefiting from Colonialism and Imperialism today- something that most people seem to conveniently overlook in these arguments, IME.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2010, 7:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-golden-age-of-the-west/533575/137 "2010-03-30T07:24:09Z")

</div>

> [@Martini\_Enfield](#):
>
> Look, I’m sorry if you believe that the only reason the Europeans colonised Africa was because they wanted to kill the locals for no particular reason. That’s not how it happened and whilst no-one- not even me- pretends that Colonialism was all about gin slings on the verandah, cricket on weekends, and free kittens for everyone, the simple fact was that Colonialism in Africa was driven by the three Cs- “Christianity, Commerce, and Civilisation”.

Also known as “kill all the unbelievers who won’t convert, loot and enslave them, and destroy their cultures”. Slavery and cruelty and mass murder in the name of profit and religion are still slavery and cruelty and mass murder.

> [@Martini\_Enfield](#):
>
> I know it’s trendy to declare Colonialism to be the Second Worst Thing Ever After Hitler, but the undeniable reality is that the reason we’re all having this conversation in English is because, several centuries ago, the people living in a smallish green island off the coast of Europe looked at a map and said “I wonder what’s over there in that blank spot? Do the people there know how awesome God and Jesus are? Do they have all the neat things we have? And can we make any money out of selling our neat stuff to them?”

More like “Who can we loot? Who can we enslave? Kill everyone who resists, and let God sort them out!” They were malignant greedy monsters, and rabid, murderous bigots. Rapists, slavers, looters, torturers, book burners, murderers. Vermin.

> [@Martini\_Enfield](#):
>
> So whether you like it or not, you’re benefiting from Colonialism and Imperialism today- something that most people seem to conveniently overlook in these arguments, IME.

Irrelevant. I wasn’t born at the time, and I take neither blame or credit for something that happened before I was born.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Martini\_Enfield](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/martini_enfield/32/11123_2.png) [@Martini\_Enfield](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Martini_Enfield)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2010, 7:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-golden-age-of-the-west/533575/138 "2010-03-30T07:40:42Z")

</div>

All I can say is that now I understand why no-one likes getting into debates with you.

Seriously, do you actually _know_ anything about the Colonial period or have you just decided it’s bad because that’s what everyone says at university/on daytime talk shows/the boards?

Like I said, it wasn’t all “It’s A Small World” with Pith Helmets and Steamships, but the colonists- your ancestors (assuming you’re white)- were not, as a matter of course,

> [@Der Trihs](#):
>
> “malignant greedy monsters, and rabid, murderous bigots. Rapists, slavers, looters, torturers, book burners, murderers. Vermin”

either.

You don’t get to throw that sort of thing around and then say “Buuuut it’s nothing to do with me because it happened centuries before I was born.” The Colonial period didn’t end that long ago- you might be surprised to discover that you’ve just called your own great-great-grandparents “rabid, murderous bigots; rapists, slavers, looters, torturers, book burners, murderers” and described them as “Vermin”.

And let’s not even get into the implications of that statement, whereby you’ve just insulted the great-great grandparents of pretty much every European-descended poster on the boards. Seriously, are you _trying_ to get people to think you’re a dickhead?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Indistinguishable](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/90ced4/32.png) [@Indistinguishable](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Indistinguishable)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2010, 7:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-golden-age-of-the-west/533575/139 "2010-03-30T07:43:54Z")

</div>

Regardless of the merits of **Der Trihs** ’s position, what’s it matter that the people he’s describing may include his own great-great-grandparents? What, is it impossible or somehow hypocritical to recognize the faults of one’s own ancestors?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shakester](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/shakester/32/437_2.png) [@Shakester](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shakester)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2010, 7:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-golden-age-of-the-west/533575/140 "2010-03-30T07:57:16Z")

</div>

Between the release of the contraceptive pill and the arrival of the AIDS virus in the public consciousness.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-golden-age-of-the-west/533575.md?page=6)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-golden-age-of-the-west/533575.md?page=8)
