[QUOTE=Terrifel]
Well, I’ve already confessed that I thought Phantoms was a hoot (and, frankly, a more satisfying read than King’s suspiciously similar take on the same basic concept, It. However, even being unfamiliar with Koontz’ other work, I still think you’re probably selling him short here-- because I’ve also read Piers Anthony’s attempt at writing horror, the eye-bitingly awful Shade of the Tree. It contains all the elements that make a Piers Anthony novel so readable; the personality-free male protagonist, the barely legal female with gorgeous attributes, the precocious child, the comic relief-- all coated with an extra layer of ickiness because Anthony’s personal issues are that much more disturbing in a non-fantastic setting. It barely misses qualifying for this thread due to its central premise:–a psychic tree (hence the punning title-- ‘shade’ = ‘spirit,’ oh Anthony, you and your puns, you wacky slyboots)– but I can’t imagine anyone actually enjoying this book (other than Anthony himself, repeatedly, stickily).
[/QUOTE]
Don’t get me wrong, I have enjoyed Koontz before…“Midnight” and “Lightning” come to mind. But after I read the third Koontz book with the same plot (family gets chased across the country by crazy/evil people until they confront each other at the end and all the bad people die), I gave up on him. There always seems to be either a disgruntled teen or precocious child involved, as well as Ring-Dings and Cheese-Doodles…all staples of King’s work.
As for Anthony, I haven’t read “Shade of the Tree,” but I have read a few things that I liked: the first 3 and 1/2 Xanth novels (after that, I got bored), a short story (published in “Again, Dangerous Visions” by Harlan Ellison) called “In the Barn,” and a horror novel he wrote entitled “Firefly.”
“Firefly” is probably the best thing I’ve read by him. Racy, controversial, pervy in places (if one is so inclined to read it that way), but enjoyable enough:
A protoplasmic alien exudes pheromones to immobilize its prey in a coma of sexual ecstacy while it sucks out their bodily fluids for sustenance.
Seriously.
It’s actually not a bad book, as his work goes, and it served as a vehicle for him to voice his perspective on sexual issues and prejudices and whatnot.