The internet of things

I agree that it’s not an enormous revolution. The beauty is not in transforming our lives. It’s in subtlety and seamlessly allowing us to make more sense of more information.

Twenty years ago, I waited for the weather report on the morning news to know what to wear to work. Ten years ago, I checked a website before heading out. Today, I glance at my smartphone. Tomorrow, my mirror will tell me that I should put on a heavier coat, consider stepping it up a bit because I have a bit because I have a big meeting that day and my contact tends to dress formally in her social media pics, remind me I wore that necklace last week, and recommend I wear flats because I just missed the bus and should walk the subway.

Well…as long as it’s got Paul Bettany’s voice then I GUESS I’m OK with it.

You sure about this even sven? It will not not be an enormous revolution?

Uh, no? This is just idle speculation.

I think it’s like smart phones. Smart phones have made out lived better. But they haven’t really changed the substance of it, just enhanced it.

How has the worked for the internet of smartphones?
Maybe if people administered their stuff right, but the password for 90% of the refrigerators out there will be “password.”

I’ve read somewhere that some smart refrigerators have already been taken over as spambots.
Plus, if your refrigerator can take voice commands (which will be coming) someone can hack into it, turn on the microphone, and listen in.
Ditto for smart picture frames. The walls will truly have ears.

The long term parking garage at SFO has something similar already - a display at the entrance tells you how many open spaces there are on each level.

Some dorm at MIT had the washers and driers hooked up so that you got mail when your load was done, and you could look to see if there were free ones from your room.

Just wait until your smart thermostat, smart air conditioner and smart windows start arguing about what the temperature should be.

The basis for a 21st century 3 stooges?

I would think that the smart air conditioner and smart windows would be slave devices, the thermostat the master/controller. The air conditioner and windows only need to be “smart” amongst themselves. (Best practices/way to operate). This is kind of basic stuff.

A few more years, they’ll be arguing about who gets to eat the last human.

Well, if we’re gonna get paranoid and all, this is what needs the " Internet of Things" in order to become fully operational and achieve self-awareness. I kid you not…

On the internet, nobody knows that you are an inanimate object.

Sure they do. Its called the Turingtest. And you just flunked, njtt. :slight_smile:

Just wait until the master thermostat disagrees with the back-up master thermostat, and decides to take matters into its own, uh… circuits.

Hey, why is it so hot in here? I’m sweating buckets! You trying to fry us all? Turn the damn heat down!

I’m sorry, Dave. I can’t do that.

Like I said in post 32, things will work out all right…

A sense of humor might make for a more accurate test criterion.

See “Naught for Hire” by John Stith in Analog. He has a bunch of other stories about this character and world, and someone was going to make a series but it fell through.
AI in appliances - probably the most accurate view of the future out there.

Sorry if I flunked the humor test njtt. :frowning:

The Internet of Things is also good for things that need their condition monitored, especially if humans are not that great at it.

A few years back part of a major bridge in Milwaukee had a “partial collapse” a span of roadway dropped a few feet. The bridge had been inspected within the past month, but clearly something was missed. Now, build a few hundred cheap sensors into the structure to measure movement, stress, etc. (I’m not an structural engineer, so I don’t know precisely what else), and you have a bridge that reports it’s health constantly.