Having traveled extensively overseas, mostly in the third world, I’m always interested in what people think about or remember about our US Presidents. So I ask about them as I travel.
Carter, curiously, was one of the ones I got the biggest response to. The reason? “Derechos humanos”, as they told me in Latin America. Human rights.
Before Carter, human rights were not a legitimate subject for discussion among governments. They were seen as an “internal” affair that each country got to choose about, and nobody could say anything.
Carter brought human rights front and center in the diplomatic world, and for that, he is remembered warmly by the folks at the bottom of the pile, the folks for whom “human rights” is more than just a slogan …
I consider this to be the most lasting, and by far the most important, of Carter’s presidential contributions. It far outweighs the problems with bunnies and hostages. He changed the landscape of international relations, and of human rights, forever.
For example, in large part, the huge debate about Guantanamo would not exist if the idea of universal human rights were not in its modern form … and for a lot of that form, we can thank Jimmy.
w.
PS - Busting Carter for the economic woes during his presidency is like busting Herbert Hoover for the Great Depression. The President has very little power over the economy, unless he wants to go on an FDR NRA kick, and modern presidents don’t really have that option.
I mean, think about it. What president wants the economy to go down? What president isn’t doing all he can to make the economy run strongly? As Clinton observed, “It’s the economy, stupid” … They’re all trying to make it work as well as it can.
And yet we still have recessions and downturns, which clearly shows the limits of presidential power over the economy.