If what the meaning of “is” is is “is,” is “is,” then, completely meaningless?
-FrL-
If what the meaning of “is” is is “is,” is “is,” then, completely meaningless?
-FrL-
It is.
But only if you don’t inhale.
What is it?
It was.
I don’t know. Is it?
John where James had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect on the teacher.
Error parsing English. ‘"’ Expected. OP Line 1.
So, if “means” means “means”, “means” means nothing?
Or, correctly punctuated:
John, where James had had “had”, had had “had had”. “Had had” had had a better effect on the teacher.
I left that as an exercise for the reader!
…oh no I’ve gone cross-eyed. [/Austin Powers]
That that is is that that is not is not is that it it is
In that case, should there be a comma between and and and and and and and?
Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo.
Pancakes.
Yes.
Post Quick Reply:
A woodchuck would chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
This is the type of thing one of the Internet’s Most intellectual Message Boards with an average age somewhere between 25 and 50 comes up with.
I love this place.
Blarg! <divide by sausage>
This is the one of type internet’s comes 50 50 50 25 age average boards comes somewhere between with and love.
place.
I remember the joy I found when looking up ‘the’ in the Oxford English dictionary. ‘The’ definition went on for pages and pages.
This will lead me to create a dictionary thread posthaste.
I think you need commas between and and and and and and and and and and and and and and and and and and and and and and and.