# The missionaries charged with kidnapping

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-missionaries-charged-with-kidnapping/528159>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [February 8, 2010, 5:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-missionaries-charged-with-kidnapping/528159 "2010-02-08T17:24:37Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 16\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Voyager](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/voyager/32/133_2.png) [@Voyager](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Voyager)\
**Post date:** [February 14, 2010, 1:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-missionaries-charged-with-kidnapping/528159/41 "2010-02-14T01:50:45Z")

</div>

> [@Magiver](#):
>
> Except at this point it’s just the suggestion that someone resembles another person on the planet.

This guy’s credentials as a lawyer are not exactly checking out. But I see no evidence of Silbey making money with him - it looks a lot more like he saw a bunch of rubes and acted accordingly.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Magiver](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/4491bb/32.png) [@Magiver](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Magiver)\
**Post date:** [February 14, 2010, 4:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-missionaries-charged-with-kidnapping/528159/42 "2010-02-14T04:31:16Z")

</div>

> [@Voyager](#):
>
> This guy’s credentials as a lawyer are not exactly checking out. But I see no evidence of Silbey making money with him - it looks a lot more like he saw a bunch of rubes and acted accordingly.

I think it depends if they can trace him to the group prior to the operation. That would look bad. I’m not saying he isn’t the person wanted by Interpol but so far it’s just a visual similarity which means next to nothing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MPB\_in\_Salt\_Lake](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/c0e974/32.png) [@MPB\_in\_Salt\_Lake](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MPB_in_Salt_Lake)\
**Post date:** [February 17, 2010, 11:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-missionaries-charged-with-kidnapping/528159/43 "2010-02-17T23:11:38Z")

</div>

Just read where a Hatian judge will release 8 of the 10 so-called missionaries on bail, but will keep group leader Laura Silbey and her personal nanny in custody.

It also turns out that the man associated with Silbey, J. Puello, is of course indeed the same man wanted for crimes against children and human trafficking in El Salvador.

For a good Christian woman, Laura Silbey can’t seem to catch a break—She had all these kids rounded up that she was all set to “rescue” (for a modest finders fee, no doubt) and those Godless hoodoo niggers in Haiti had to jamm up her big payday.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Paul\_in\_Qatar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/ccd318/32.png) [@Paul\_in\_Qatar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Paul_in_Qatar)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2010, 2:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-missionaries-charged-with-kidnapping/528159/44 "2010-02-18T02:31:14Z")

</div>

Another thing … The wise Old Rabbi was asked what caused crime. He replied “People who buy stolen goods.”

I know American families who have done this sort of thing. “Nice people” who were unable to get pregnant. Off they flew to Romania or some other hellhole with wads of cash. They came back with perfect little children and all sort of fancy paperwork.

To be fair, they raised the kids well. But at what point does this sort of a adoption become trafficking in children?

I don’t know, but I suspect my friends crossed that line.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Otara](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/a88e4f/32.png) [@Otara](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Otara)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2010, 3:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-missionaries-charged-with-kidnapping/528159/45 "2010-02-18T03:27:06Z")

</div>

The hague convention principles are that first family has to be found, next local/country, and only overseas adoption if the other options arent available.

So in itself the scenario you give doesnt mean it definitely was child trafficking, but of course the chances are much higher that it was so and thats why things like the Hague convention came into being. Anyone not going through agencies operating under that convention is now far more likely to be involved in some form of child trafficking situation.

The problem is people are also willing to pay a lot to have a child through things like IVF or the like, ie its not only the willingness to buy stolen goods that creates the market, as the willingness to pay a lot of money to have a child, making them worthwhile to steal and sell as ‘legitimate’ adopted children, as well as more obvious ‘you’re really doing child trafficking’ setups.

Otara

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tapioca\_Dextrin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/3d9bf3/32.png) [@Tapioca\_Dextrin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tapioca_Dextrin)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2010, 3:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-missionaries-charged-with-kidnapping/528159/46 "2010-02-18T03:38:06Z")

</div>

Curiouser and curiouser. According to the [BBC](http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8521070.stm)

> [@](#):
>
> “The judge wants to question two of my clients because they were in Haiti before the earthquake,” the group’s lawyer Aviol Fleurant told AFP news agency.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Paul\_in\_Qatar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/ccd318/32.png) [@Paul\_in\_Qatar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Paul_in_Qatar)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2010, 4:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-missionaries-charged-with-kidnapping/528159/47 "2010-02-18T04:26:17Z")

</div>

> [@Otara](#):
>
> The hague convention principles…

Yes, but.

My train of thought was simply that"Nice People" can convince themselves to bad things and make bad problems. I mean I know a couple of these couples. Nice people. Not a doubt in my mind they meant well.

Still, the more I learn about international adoptions … well let’s say it raises doubts in my mind.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TheTerribleTako](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/ba8739/32.png) [@TheTerribleTako](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TheTerribleTako)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2010, 4:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-missionaries-charged-with-kidnapping/528159/48 "2010-02-18T04:28:15Z")

</div>

> [@Simplicio](#):
>
> That seems kinda unlikely.
> 
> There was a similar case on NPR a few years ago about a missionary outfit that took kids from some islands in the S. Pacific from their parents with similar claims, and then gave them to US families looking to adopt. Eventually, one of the families found out that their adopted daughters folks were looking her, putting themselves and all of the other well meaning adopters in the awkward position of basically having unknowingly kidnapped their children, and having to decide whether to return them to their old families.
> 
> (sorry for vague details, hopefully somoene with a better memory can fill in the story)

Were you thinking of the This American Life [story](http://www.thisamericanlife.org/Radio_Episode.aspx?sched=1296) of the Nybergs who adopted from Samoa? That was a heartbreaking story. I believe the couple later divorced as well.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Otara](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/a88e4f/32.png) [@Otara](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Otara)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2010, 4:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-missionaries-charged-with-kidnapping/528159/49 "2010-02-18T04:40:08Z")

</div>

“Still, the more I learn about international adoptions … well let’s say it raises doubts in my mind.”

You might want to read up more on how its done in places like Australia then. There are more checks and balances in place to reduce the profit motive aspects, by removing the ability of would be parents being able to directly interact with the people who have the children to adopt, it all goes through the Department of Human services.

As a result its more the scenario you’re describing where it occurs now, rather than inside those systems. As a result international adoptions are dropping drastically here and Im quite sure thats at least partly due to the profit motive being largely removed under this system.

Otara

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Paul\_in\_Qatar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/ccd318/32.png) [@Paul\_in\_Qatar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Paul_in_Qatar)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2010, 5:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-missionaries-charged-with-kidnapping/528159/50 "2010-02-18T05:11:33Z")

</div>

Well I admit my ignorance. Just my observations of some Yuppie couples in America.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Askance](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/askance/32/8281_2.png) [@Askance](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Askance)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2010, 5:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-missionaries-charged-with-kidnapping/528159/51 "2010-02-18T05:17:09Z")

</div>

> [@Palo\_Verde](#):
>
> On the other hand, it doesn’t appear they had any nefarious intent for these children. They wanted to take them somewhere that they would be better cared for.

Here’s some [remedial reading](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stolen_Generations) for you. Children taken from their parents, their culture, and their origins never recover, never forget, and are never “better off” in a real sense. They may well be _materially_ better off, but being forceably separated from your family is always destructive. Answer this, if you will: had someone taken you from your parents and put you in the care of, say, Warren Buffet, Bill Gates or Richard Branson, how do you think you would feel?

> [@](#):
>
> I’ve read that real child traffickers have descended on Haiti to snatch up kids to force them to be prostitutes or slaves. These missionaries are clearly not like that.

Not suite so clear now, is it?

> [@](#):
>
> Is what they did really that wrong? How strict should their sentence be?

Yes. As severe as the law allows.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2010, 5:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-missionaries-charged-with-kidnapping/528159/52 "2010-02-18T05:22:29Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> Unfortunately the consequence of this is that there an awful lot of really, really dodgy adoptions going on. The Haitian one is only the best known at the moment, but it’s happening all over the world. See for example a recent UNICEF report about the Vietnamese adoption industry, which found it to be very clearly demand-driven rather than supply-driven. In other words, the more foreign (read Western) parents looking to adopt children from Vietnam, the more “adoptable” children magically appear. It doesn’t take a genius to work out that something’s not right there. Ethiopia is another good example.

A friend of mine adopted a girl from India. A couple of years after the adoption, the local authorities raided the orphanage she came from and, well, you know those “puppy mills” you hear about the ASPCA cracking down on? Basically, picture that, except with children instead of puppies, and you get the idea.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ruadh](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/d2c977/32.png) [@ruadh](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ruadh)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2010, 7:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-missionaries-charged-with-kidnapping/528159/53 "2010-02-18T07:04:27Z")

</div>

> [@Otara](#):
>
> The hague convention principles are that first family has to be found, next local/country, and only overseas adoption if the other options arent available.
> 
> So in itself the scenario you give doesnt mean it definitely was child trafficking, but of course the chances are much higher that it was so and thats why things like the Hague convention came into being. Anyone not going through agencies operating under that convention is now far more likely to be involved in some form of child trafficking situation.

Unfortunately, a large number of “source” countries for international adoption have yet to sign or ratify the Hague Convention. Haiti, incidentally, is one of them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Otara](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/a88e4f/32.png) [@Otara](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Otara)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2010, 7:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-missionaries-charged-with-kidnapping/528159/54 "2010-02-18T07:35:38Z")

</div>

Which will always be the case as the requirements are fairly stringent, and states without infrastructure are one of those sources.

The philosophy generally is that its better to be stringent and not allow adoption rather than to risk the possibility of child trafficking that would otherwise result. I dont know the US stance on this, but in Australia it basically means you cant internationally adopt children from those countries.

Otara

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Man\_In\_Black](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/bcef8e/32.png) [@The\_Man\_In\_Black](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Man_In_Black)\
**Post date:** [February 19, 2010, 5:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-missionaries-charged-with-kidnapping/528159/55 "2010-02-19T05:51:33Z")

</div>

8 of the 10 have been let go. I say this is the right call. Trying to help should not be a crime. And these 8 were just trying to help. As far as I know…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ruadh](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/d2c977/32.png) [@ruadh](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ruadh)\
**Post date:** [February 19, 2010, 6:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-missionaries-charged-with-kidnapping/528159/56 "2010-02-19T06:38:22Z")

</div>

> [@Otara](#):
>
> The philosophy generally is that its better to be stringent and not allow adoption rather than to risk the possibility of child trafficking that would otherwise result.

I agree with this, but it isn’t the law throughout the western world. In Ireland such adoptions are allowed if we have a bilateral agreement with the non-Hague country. The problem is these bilateral agreements are wholly insufficient to ensure the country is actually living up to its responsibilities in this area. We saw this recently with Vietnam (see my earlier post). I believe Britain has similar alternative procedures for non-Hague countries, which are no doubt equally inadequate.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-missionaries-charged-with-kidnapping/528159.md?page=2)
