Here is an interesting update.
rwj
I don’t understand why your evidence makes Cecil wrong. He says that the visual cues and/or sky make the moon seem larger, and nothing else - no distortion of light or anything. How is he wrong?
Here is an interesting update.
rwj
I don’t understand why your evidence makes Cecil wrong. He says that the visual cues and/or sky make the moon seem larger, and nothing else - no distortion of light or anything. How is he wrong?