The most important thing you need to know about the voter ID issue . . .

[Bricker]

@BrainGlutton

I’d say, about where Hasen draws it; see post #272. Any objections?

At least now, you recognize the value of reducing the burden of voting – something you have in the past explicitly rejected.

Not quite; I have only rejected the specific claims that the burdens associated with getting a photo ID are too onerous to be accepted.

[BrainGlutton]

@Bricker

Not quite; I have only rejected the specific claims that the burdens associated with getting a photo ID are too onerous to be accepted.

What about Hasen’s proposals, then? Costs tax dollars, but takes the burdens off all voters.

[BrainGlutton]

@Bricker

Not quite. . .

:dubious: And why not quite?

[Bricker]

@BrainGlutton

I’d say, about where Hasen draws it; see post #272. Any objections?

No objections – of course, I’d want to be able to withdraw this approval if someone points out a large cost that escaped my notice, but as a general set of guiding principles, I think he’s on reasonably solid ground.