# The movie whose ending sucketh biggest.

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-movie-whose-ending-sucketh-biggest/340058>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [January 15, 2006, 6:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-movie-whose-ending-sucketh-biggest/340058 "2006-01-15T06:47:18Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ArrMatey](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/arrmatey/32/3522_2.png) [@ArrMatey](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ArrMatey)\
**Post date:** [January 17, 2006, 5:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-movie-whose-ending-sucketh-biggest/340058/81 "2006-01-17T17:47:56Z")

</div>

> [@Baldwin](#):
>
> I also thought the ending to _The 40-Year-Old Virgin_ was just right.  
> I can’t believe I’m defending any aspect of that stupid movie, but here goes. I thought the last shot was one of the few genuinely creepy moments of the film, given the significance of the character standing in the corner.
> 
> Otherwise, what a crappy movie. They actually bragged about most of the dialogue being improvised. Y’know what would have **really** improved the movie? _A script!_ Too bad, because there was nothing wrong with the basic concept.

Yes, yes, let me re-define. I think the ending image was very creepy. But the entire movie was terrible, terrible build-up. And I mean terrible as in a ‘Is it OVER yet?’ sort of way. Then that. Then nothing.

GAH! OG SMASH!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ludovic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/7ab992/32.png) [@Ludovic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ludovic)\
**Post date:** [January 17, 2006, 6:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-movie-whose-ending-sucketh-biggest/340058/82 "2006-01-17T18:21:44Z")

</div>

> [@awldune](#):
>
> No hate for _The Return of the King_?

Yes. They should have shown The Scouring. Or at least filmed it to have on the extended version. It diminished RotK from a Sublime Masterpiece like the other two, down to merely a Pretty Good Movie.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [January 17, 2006, 6:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-movie-whose-ending-sucketh-biggest/340058/83 "2006-01-17T18:27:35Z")

</div>

> [@brickbacon](#):
>
> I can’t believe nobody has mentioned **Signs** and **The Village**. They need no explanation. M. Night Shyamalan is King of the Crappy Endings.

The underlying **concepts** of both those films sucked New Orleans street sewage. But the endings fit right in with the concept – in fact I can’t see how either film could have ended differently.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [January 17, 2006, 6:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-movie-whose-ending-sucketh-biggest/340058/84 "2006-01-17T18:28:47Z")

</div>

> [@Ludovic](#):
>
> Yes. They should have shown The Scouring. Or at least filmed it to have on the extended version. It diminished RotK from a Sublime Masterpiece like the other two, down to merely a Pretty Good Movie.

Agreed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [January 17, 2006, 6:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-movie-whose-ending-sucketh-biggest/340058/85 "2006-01-17T18:46:33Z")

</div>

> [@awldune](#):
>
> No hate for _The Return of the King_? Not only was the ending unbearable, it kept going for what seemed like hours.

Definitely not one of the worst endings ever, but I agree with what you’re saying. The movie felt like it ended at least four times, only to come back for more wrapping-up. The slow-mo reunion scene was maybe the only complete clunker in the entire trilogy; that was pretty awful. I think some of the Scouring of the Shire advocates must have asses made of steel.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RikWriter](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/49beb7/32.png) [@RikWriter](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RikWriter)\
**Post date:** [January 17, 2006, 6:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-movie-whose-ending-sucketh-biggest/340058/86 "2006-01-17T18:48:37Z")

</div>

> [@Ludovic](#):
>
> Yes. They should have shown The Scouring. Or at least filmed it to have on the extended version. It diminished RotK from a Sublime Masterpiece like the other two, down to merely a Pretty Good Movie.

I disagree. The Scouring would have made the movie totally unworkable. I mean, I would not have minded having it in the extended DVD version, but for theatrical release it would have been a disaster. And filming something that would have been that expensive just for release on the DVD would be unrealistic.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Improv\_Geek](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/b3f665/32.png) [@Improv\_Geek](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Improv_Geek)\
**Post date:** [January 17, 2006, 6:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-movie-whose-ending-sucketh-biggest/340058/87 "2006-01-17T18:49:08Z")

</div>

You know what? And I may be banned from the geek mecca or valhalla for saying this but **Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King**. Why?

Because you shouldn’t use 5 fade effects in a row to transition between those wrap ups. Either include them seamlessly or with a narrative or CUT THEM. I am all for staying close to the story, but after a 3 hour movie, fading to black is a sign of closure - not that you’re transitioning. :mad:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [January 17, 2006, 7:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-movie-whose-ending-sucketh-biggest/340058/88 "2006-01-17T19:16:59Z")

</div>

Thanks, **ronin** ; that explains why the ending is such a pain in the ass. It’s too long anyway, but it was like Jackson was trying to fake you out.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Leviosaurus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/439d5e/32.png) [@Leviosaurus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Leviosaurus)\
**Post date:** [January 17, 2006, 7:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-movie-whose-ending-sucketh-biggest/340058/89 "2006-01-17T19:20:57Z")

</div>

> [@Rufus Xavier](#):
>
> Worst ending - ever - was in Damnation Alley [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0075909/](http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0075909/)
> 
> The world is knocked off its axis or something, and everything goes to hell in a handbasket. I mean, this movie puts the “post” in post-apocalyptic. Then, at the end:
> 
> The world tilts back to it’s correct position and everything’s fine. I mean, like one second everyone is living in a radioactive sandstorm, and the next second, two guys are riding bikes down a tree-lined street on a beautiful, sunny day. Blech!

An even bigger crime was that it ruined the reputation of the book, which was so utterly awesome and ahead of its time. That wretched mistake of a movie also assured that none of Zelazney’s other works would ever be considered for a Hollywood production.

I happened to read _Damnation Alley_ right after I read Hunter S. Thompson’s _Hell’s Angels_. I hadn’t realized that _DA_ was inspired by _HA_. I strongly recommend reading both books, in that order. It’s a fun ride.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![msmith537](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/d9b06d/32.png) [@msmith537](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/msmith537)\
**Post date:** [January 17, 2006, 7:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-movie-whose-ending-sucketh-biggest/340058/90 "2006-01-17T19:21:55Z")

</div>

> [@Engineer Dude](#):
>
> I guess I was disappointed because I thought he’d lose his virginity out of developing his macking skills, rather than through marriage.[/spoiler]

That wasn’t the point of the movie. The point was that “macking” is ultimately unsatisfying and that relationships are what makes life enjoyable. He could have hit it any number of times, but he wanted to do it on his own terms. The ending after that was pretty random though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Scupper](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/b9bd4f/32.png) [@Scupper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Scupper)\
**Post date:** [January 17, 2006, 7:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-movie-whose-ending-sucketh-biggest/340058/91 "2006-01-17T19:56:04Z")

</div>

Ditto **A.I.**. Man that could have been a pretty good movie if they’d ended it 20 minutes sooner.

No mention of **The Abyss**?

After the incredibly moving and powerful sequence in which

Bud tells his un-estranged wife that he knew it was a one-way trip to the bottom of the trench to disarm the bomb. (“KNEW THIS WAS A ONE WAY TRIP” “LUV YOU WIFE”)

Cameron proceded to:

Have Bud rescued by the water aliens and everybody returned to the surface in a big pink soap dish, all properly decompressed and everything.

Personally, I turn the movie off after the last text message Bud sends. It’s perfect.  
And I cannot believe no one has mentioned the end of **Four Weddings and a Funeral** which, though it is a perfectly acceptable ending, makes the incredible mistake of handing the reins to Andie MacDowall and letting her perform possibly the worst line delivery in history.

Going back to Spielburg, **Minority Report** continues his streak of tacking on horrible endings to great movies.

After a brilliant, twisted and heartbreaking moment where Tom Cruise realizes that the man he’s predestined to murder is the man who murdered his son, he tries to fight fate but the guy grabs at his gun and it goes off, killing him anyway. Then an entire BS afterplot is tacked on to pin the blame on Max von Sydow’s character for rather stupid reasons and totally invalidate the devastating impact of the previous revelation. Nice job, Steve.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TellMeI\_mNotCrazy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tellmei_mnotcrazy/32/3419_2.png) [@TellMeI\_mNotCrazy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TellMeI_mNotCrazy)\
**Post date:** [January 17, 2006, 8:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-movie-whose-ending-sucketh-biggest/340058/92 "2006-01-17T20:39:49Z")

</div>

> [@Scupper](#):
>
> And I cannot believe no one has mentioned the end of Four Weddings and a Funeral which, though it is a perfectly acceptable ending, makes the incredible mistake of handing the reins to Andie MacDowall and letting her perform possibly the worst line delivery in history.

Amen to that. I even started a thread once, inspired by that scene, called “Worst Delivery in the History of Movies” or something similar… Is it raining? I hadn’t noticed. Gah!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Improv\_Geek](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/b3f665/32.png) [@Improv\_Geek](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Improv_Geek)\
**Post date:** [January 17, 2006, 8:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-movie-whose-ending-sucketh-biggest/340058/93 "2006-01-17T20:52:30Z")

</div>

> [@Marley23](#):
>
> Thanks, **ronin** ; that explains why the ending is such a pain in the ass. It’s too long anyway, but it was like Jackson was trying to fake you out.

yeah I felt the same way and I was like, “Dude, you just got 10 hours of my life for 3 awesome movies. Don’t begin screwing with me now.” _sigh_

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Leviosaurus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/439d5e/32.png) [@Leviosaurus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Leviosaurus)\
**Post date:** [January 17, 2006, 9:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-movie-whose-ending-sucketh-biggest/340058/94 "2006-01-17T21:04:05Z")

</div>

> [@Scupper](#):
>
> Ditto **A.I.**. Man that could have been a pretty good movie if they’d ended it 20 minutes sooner.
> 
> No mention of **The Abyss**?
> 
> After the incredibly moving and powerful sequence in which
> 
> Bud tells his un-estranged wife that he knew it was a one-way trip to the bottom of the trench to disarm the bomb. (“KNEW THIS WAS A ONE WAY TRIP” “LUV YOU WIFE”)
> 
> Cameron proceded to:
> 
> Have Bud rescued by the water aliens and everybody returned to the surface in a big pink soap dish, all properly decompressed and everything.
> 
> Personally, I turn the movie off after the last text message Bud sends. It’s perfect.

The ending of the Director’s cut is MUCH worse.

[spoiler]The aliens create gigantic tidal waves that hover on the coast off all major coastal cities. They explain to Bud that they intend to wipe out humanity for being so violent and bloody. Then they back the waves off, saving all humanity and tell Bud it’s because his love for his wife has touched them so.

_BARF_[/spoiler]This is one case where the execs get my thanks for chopping the hell out of the Director’s original vision. Bad as it is, the released ending looks like a work of genius when compared to what Cameron wanted to put out.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ludovic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/7ab992/32.png) [@Ludovic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ludovic)\
**Post date:** [January 17, 2006, 9:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-movie-whose-ending-sucketh-biggest/340058/95 "2006-01-17T21:23:49Z")

</div>

Hey, I agree that the fades were a stupid way to transition. When I saw it for the first time I was thinking “Ahhh! The coronation’s over! Fade out! Now the movie’s over! No, wait! There’s still more!”

Even though the extra “endings” are a bonus for me rather than a negative, (even though I didn’t get the most important one,) the way it was faded was really jarring. Perhaps a scene or two of travel or just a clean cut to the next scene with a subtitle describing place and time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TellMeI\_mNotCrazy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tellmei_mnotcrazy/32/3419_2.png) [@TellMeI\_mNotCrazy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TellMeI_mNotCrazy)\
**Post date:** [January 17, 2006, 9:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-movie-whose-ending-sucketh-biggest/340058/96 "2006-01-17T21:29:34Z")

</div>

It’s been a long time since I’ve seen it, but I think Dances With Wolves had the same sort of “fade to black” confusion. I do know that there was a point in the movie that I very definitely thought was the end of the movie (where Costner and his father-in-law are in the field) - it felt like the end - and suddenly, there was another hour and a half.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dob](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b2d939/32.png) [@Dob](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dob)\
**Post date:** [January 17, 2006, 9:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-movie-whose-ending-sucketh-biggest/340058/97 "2006-01-17T21:50:16Z")

</div>

Not the worst ending ever, but close, and since I just watched the DVD over the weekend its fresh in my mind…_Transporter 2_

[spoiler]After an absurd fight in a rolling airplane, the plane crashes from a few thousand feet into the freaking ocean. The Transporter is unhurt, as is the bad guy. The Transporter cant kill the bad guy since he contains the only antidote to some virus he released. So what does the Transporter do? Manges to break his spine, under water mind you, in just the right spot that it paralyzes him from the neck down and swims with him to the surface.

Next scene; Everyone who was infected with the virus has been cured…despite the fact it should kill you in like 48hrs and how do you manaufacture an antidote from someones blood then distrubute it all, in just 48hours???..

Worst ending to a movie that wasnt really all that bad…!![/spoiler]

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [January 18, 2006, 3:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-movie-whose-ending-sucketh-biggest/340058/98 "2006-01-18T15:21:31Z")

</div>

_Agnes of God:_ Two hours with no hint of any supernatural elements in the story and you’re going to give us fucking **stigmata?!** :mad:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BMalion](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/e274bd/32.png) [@BMalion](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BMalion)\
**Post date:** [January 18, 2006, 4:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-movie-whose-ending-sucketh-biggest/340058/99 "2006-01-18T16:05:04Z")

</div>

> [@Snowboarder Bo](#):
>
> 53 posts and no one has mentioned Tim Burton’s incredibly lame _Planet of the Apes_? I mean, i know the whole movie sucked ass, but the ending… ewwwwwww. Stinker. I was mad as I watched the movie, but when it ended, I was ready to drive to LA and hunt Mr. Burton down.
> 
> [rant]\<grumbling\>stupid crackhead goth idiot…\<trails off\>[/rant]

In all fairness, that’s how the book pretty much ends.

The movie still sucked however.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HPL](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/3da27b/32.png) [@HPL](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/HPL)\
**Post date:** [January 18, 2006, 4:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-movie-whose-ending-sucketh-biggest/340058/100 "2006-01-18T16:07:06Z")

</div>

> [@Finagle](#):
>
> The original Star Wars had a pretty bad ending. Not the whole blowing up of the Death Star, but rather that stupid processional where they’re all given medals amidst cheering and waving. It was just so \* lame \*.

I’m trying to figure out if you’re kidding or what. It seemed a good way to end the movie.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-movie-whose-ending-sucketh-biggest/340058.md?page=4)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-movie-whose-ending-sucketh-biggest/340058.md?page=6)
