# The MPAA vs. The Internets

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-mpaa-vs-the-internets/402426>\
**Category:** Miscellaneous and Personal Stuff I Must Share\
**Created:** [May 2, 2007, 5:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-mpaa-vs-the-internets/402426 "2007-05-02T05:29:01Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 14\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![athelas](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/5e9695/32.png) [@athelas](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/athelas)\
**Post date:** [May 2, 2007, 5:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-mpaa-vs-the-internets/402426/1 "2007-05-02T05:29:01Z")

</div>

The MPAA has been introducing a new encryption system for the HD-DVD line, which was intended to prevent people from simply ripping the movie and distributing it online. On April 30, (no single authoritative source, just concurrence of independent sources) someone managed to crack the encryption, producing a key (_[Removed - SkipMagic]_) that can unlock all the data on existing HD-DVDs. (Obviously, they’ll be changing that key pretty quickly for new DVDs).  
What happened, though, was that the MPAA quickly moved in to force websites showing the key to be shut down, applying pressure even to well-known sites like wikipedia, which despite their popularity cannot afford a lawsuit like that. Internet denizens, having no life to speak of, quickly spread the code to various websites faster than they could be shut down. One particularly interesting case is digg, which has a business relationship with HD-DVD and has allegedly engaged in some shady shut-downs of stories on its front page. Given its user-generated interface, people have been flooding it with articles containing the code. Interesting times. [More info](http://www.computing.co.uk/vnunet/news/2188970/drm-lobby-tries-hd-dvd-genie)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Garfield226](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/9e8a1a/32.png) [@Garfield226](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Garfield226)\
**Post date:** [May 2, 2007, 7:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-mpaa-vs-the-internets/402426/2 "2007-05-02T07:46:35Z")

</div>

And what makes you think the Chicago Reader/SDMB can afford a lawsuit like that?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Achren](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/898d66/32.png) [@Achren](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Achren)\
**Post date:** [May 2, 2007, 7:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-mpaa-vs-the-internets/402426/3 "2007-05-02T07:57:47Z")

</div>

Already reported.  
Interesting “riddles” involving the key going around as well.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fern\_Forest](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/71c47a/32.png) [@Fern\_Forest](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fern_Forest)\
**Post date:** [May 2, 2007, 8:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-mpaa-vs-the-internets/402426/4 "2007-05-02T08:17:08Z")

</div>

Given what’s happening one wonders whether they’ll ever get around to sending a notice here. It’ll be like trying to send a cease and desist letter to every single molecule of urine in the pool.

Looks like Slashdot is allowing the code to stand.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Vision\_of\_Love](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/5f8ce5/32.png) [@Vision\_of\_Love](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Vision_of_Love)\
**Post date:** [May 2, 2007, 8:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-mpaa-vs-the-internets/402426/5 "2007-05-02T08:25:09Z")

</div>

I wouldn’t bother reporting this thread. The number is _everywhere_ by now and most people who’d be looking for it would hit the tech sites first.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fern\_Forest](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/71c47a/32.png) [@Fern\_Forest](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fern_Forest)\
**Post date:** [May 2, 2007, 8:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-mpaa-vs-the-internets/402426/6 "2007-05-02T08:25:28Z")

</div>

I wonder what would happen if you bought a shirt with the code on it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rigamarole](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/77aa72/32.png) [@Rigamarole](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rigamarole)\
**Post date:** [May 2, 2007, 8:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-mpaa-vs-the-internets/402426/7 "2007-05-02T08:27:36Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Fern Forest]  
I wonder what would happen if you bought a shirt with the code on it?  
[/QUOTE]

You would be sued into oblivion. I wouldn’t recommend it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Vision\_of\_Love](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/5f8ce5/32.png) [@Vision\_of\_Love](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Vision_of_Love)\
**Post date:** [May 2, 2007, 8:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-mpaa-vs-the-internets/402426/8 "2007-05-02T08:28:41Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Fern Forest]  
I wonder what would happen if you bought a shirt with the code on it?  
[/QUOTE]

If you’re that curious…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shalmanese](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/45deac/32.png) [@Shalmanese](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shalmanese)\
**Post date:** [May 2, 2007, 8:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-mpaa-vs-the-internets/402426/9 "2007-05-02T08:28:53Z")

</div>

We seem to get into this debate with some regularity. First it was the 3 lines of perl that could encode RSA, then it was DeCSS, now it’s this.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Achren](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/898d66/32.png) [@Achren](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Achren)\
**Post date:** [May 2, 2007, 8:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-mpaa-vs-the-internets/402426/10 "2007-05-02T08:37:59Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Vision of Love]  
I wouldn’t bother reporting this thread. The number is _everywhere_ by now and most people who’d be looking for it would hit the tech sites first.  
[/QUOTE]

Yeah, but we’ve seen in the past that The Reader seems to feel the SDMB is its red-headed stepchild, so I figured better to be safe. Besides, ultimately it’s up to the mods to decide.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mangetout](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mangetout/32/19_2.png) [@Mangetout](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mangetout)\
**Post date:** [May 2, 2007, 8:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-mpaa-vs-the-internets/402426/11 "2007-05-02T08:55:19Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Fern Forest]  
I wonder what would happen if you bought a shirt with the code on it?  
[/QUOTE]  
your Versace Cortex (the part of your brain that regulates dress sense) would wither and die.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fern\_Forest](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/71c47a/32.png) [@Fern\_Forest](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fern_Forest)\
**Post date:** [May 2, 2007, 9:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-mpaa-vs-the-internets/402426/12 "2007-05-02T09:02:01Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Mangetout]  
your Versace Cortex (the part of your brain that regulates dress sense) would wither and die.  
[/QUOTE]

I’ve got a recessive one anyway. Actually I refuse to wear anything with words and symbols on it. I was just curious how things would proceed should representing lawyer see someone walking down the street like that.

I guess I assume they’d just ignore it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Indistinguishable](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/90ced4/32.png) [@Indistinguishable](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Indistinguishable)\
**Post date:** [May 2, 2007, 9:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-mpaa-vs-the-internets/402426/13 "2007-05-02T09:07:40Z")

</div>

Of all the things one could try to remove from public view once it’s out there and there’s an interest in it, a mere 128 bits seems ridiculously infeasible.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SkipMagic](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/skipmagic/32/20706_2.png) [@SkipMagic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SkipMagic)\
**Post date:** [May 2, 2007, 10:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-mpaa-vs-the-internets/402426/14 "2007-05-02T10:38:02Z")

</div>

So, **athelas** , your first thought was that, unlike Wikipedia, we _could_ afford a lawsuit?

Do _not_ do this again unless you want your posting privileges to come under review.

ETA: I’ve a request to re-open this thread because the discussion is worthwhile. And, I agree, but we already have another thread on the same topic going on [here](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=419123). Please head that way.
