# The New J.K. Rowling (Robert Galbraith) book is only available in audio books? WTH?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-new-j-k-rowling-robert-galbraith-book-is-only-available-in-audio-books-wth/690766>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [June 14, 2014, 12:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-new-j-k-rowling-robert-galbraith-book-is-only-available-in-audio-books-wth/690766 "2014-06-14T12:44:16Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 8\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ftg](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ftg/32/2801_2.png) [@ftg](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ftg)\
**Post date:** [June 15, 2014, 2:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-new-j-k-rowling-robert-galbraith-book-is-only-available-in-audio-books-wth/690766/21 "2014-06-15T14:44:25Z")

</div>

> [@Sage\_Rat](#):
>
> Amazon’s big thing is to try and get the lowest price for the customer. If you were an author or a publisher, you’d probably want Amazon to fail in their negotiations. But as a customer, I’d probably hope Amazon wins.

This is standard Amazon PR baloney. Don’t believe it for a second. Amazon just wants more money for itself, plain and simple.

As far as eBooks are concerned, the battle is between Amazon and the publishers to cheat the writers out of the share they would get if the books were on paper. I don’t see how discouraging writers from writing helps anybody.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Erdosain](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/erdosain/32/7284_2.png) [@Erdosain](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Erdosain)\
**Post date:** [June 15, 2014, 3:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-new-j-k-rowling-robert-galbraith-book-is-only-available-in-audio-books-wth/690766/22 "2014-06-15T15:44:40Z")

</div>

> [@ftg](#):
>
> This is standard Amazon PR baloney. Don’t believe it for a second. Amazon just wants more money for itself, plain and simple.
> 
> As far as eBooks are concerned, the battle is between Amazon and the publishers to cheat the writers out of the share they would get if the books were on paper. I don’t see how discouraging writers from writing helps anybody.

So that’s what the negotiations are about, really? Amazon is making demands about Hachette’s payments to its authors? No. Amazon wants flexibility in ebook pricing (so they can keep their stranglehold on ebook hardware). Hachette and all the publishers want to keep ebook prices high with total control of the price, so they can make more money. There are no good guys and bad guys here.

I think Amazon is more dangerous, long term, but I don’t want $15 or $20 ebooks to become the norm either.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sherrerd](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sherrerd/32/8_2.png) [@Sherrerd](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sherrerd)\
**Post date:** [June 15, 2014, 8:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-new-j-k-rowling-robert-galbraith-book-is-only-available-in-audio-books-wth/690766/23 "2014-06-15T20:20:52Z")

</div>

> [@ISiddiqui](#):
>
> They never really will be. It isn’t Barnes and Nobles that is Amazon’s greatest competitor these days; it’s Walmart. And they aren’t going anywhere.

Walmart may not be going anywhere, but it’s also unlikely to offer more than the NY Times Bestseller List (or equivalent) books. Walmart shows no signs of becoming a comprehensive source of books, e- or otherwise. It thus competes with Amazon on only a relative handful of books.

Amazon is not doing battle with Hachette on behalf of consumers; it’s doing battle with Hachette as part of its own quest for market dominance. In this respect, Amazon is just like every other business entity. This is not about Good versus Evil; this is about human nature. We seek to eliminate competition and achieve monopolistic power whenever possible. (It’s a legitimate function of government to determine whether monopolies benefit and promote economic productivity for the nation as a whole; in virtually all cases the answer is that monopoly is not beneficial to the economy as a whole. But that’s another thread.)

Amazon’s “low prices” will vanish the moment that Amazon puts every effective competitor out of business.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ftg](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ftg/32/2801_2.png) [@ftg](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ftg)\
**Post date:** [June 15, 2014, 9:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-new-j-k-rowling-robert-galbraith-book-is-only-available-in-audio-books-wth/690766/24 "2014-06-15T21:11:35Z")

</div>

> [@Erdosain](#):
>
> So that’s what the negotiations are about, really? Amazon is making demands about Hachette’s payments to its authors? No. Amazon wants flexibility in ebook pricing (so they can keep their stranglehold on ebook hardware). Hachette and all the publishers want to keep ebook prices high with total control of the price, so they can make more money. There are no good guys and bad guys here.

Actually, Amazon noticed that publishers were screwing authors out of payments for eBooks. Ergo, Amazon wants a share of that dough. Reducing costs to consumers is total PR nonsense.

There are definitely bad guys here. Publishers obviously and now Amazon is using its monopolistic position to get more dough from publishers and studios.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ISiddiqui](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/97f17d/32.png) [@ISiddiqui](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ISiddiqui)\
**Post date:** [June 16, 2014, 12:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-new-j-k-rowling-robert-galbraith-book-is-only-available-in-audio-books-wth/690766/25 "2014-06-16T00:39:30Z")

</div>

> [@Sherrerd](#):
>
> Amazon’s “low prices” will vanish the moment that Amazon puts every effective competitor out of business.

So people say. Is there any evidence for this in actual practice by Amazon?

I’m not inclined to believe in scare predictions.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Baron\_Greenback](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/baron_greenback/32/48_2.png) [@Baron\_Greenback](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Baron_Greenback)\
**Post date:** [June 16, 2014, 12:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-new-j-k-rowling-robert-galbraith-book-is-only-available-in-audio-books-wth/690766/26 "2014-06-16T00:44:45Z")

</div>

> [@ISiddiqui](#):
>
> So people say. Is there any evidence for this in actual practice by Amazon?
> 
> I’m not inclined to believe in scare predictions.

I dunno, it’s a company that makes very little if any profit, has never paid a dividend, and does aggressive expansion for breakfast. What could the end game be?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ISiddiqui](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/97f17d/32.png) [@ISiddiqui](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ISiddiqui)\
**Post date:** [June 16, 2014, 3:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-new-j-k-rowling-robert-galbraith-book-is-only-available-in-audio-books-wth/690766/27 "2014-06-16T03:57:33Z")

</div>

I mean people have said the same things about Walmart and yet, even in towns where Walmart is the only game in town, it has very cheap prices on goods.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sherrerd](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sherrerd/32/8_2.png) [@Sherrerd](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sherrerd)\
**Post date:** [June 16, 2014, 6:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-new-j-k-rowling-robert-galbraith-book-is-only-available-in-audio-books-wth/690766/28 "2014-06-16T18:59:03Z")

</div>

> [@ISiddiqui](#):
>
> I mean people have said the same things about Walmart and yet, even in towns where Walmart is the only game in town, it has very cheap prices on goods.

I think you’d see that change if Walmart became the only game in town _everywhere_. As it is, they can scarcely start charging $20 for a loaf of bread in Podunk, just because there are no other grocery stores there, because other suppliers of bread still exist, and they’d ship in $15 loaves and undercut Walmart.

(Also, if Walmart raised all prices in little towns with no other stores, it would be terrible publicity. If enough people became enraged at Walmart, then legislators might have to change current laws that let Walmart get away with a lot that it’s doing.)

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-new-j-k-rowling-robert-galbraith-book-is-only-available-in-audio-books-wth/690766.md?page=1)
