The New Twilight Zone: Craptastic!

Okay… here’s where I really get to prove my geek cred:

The episode you’re thinking of is A World of His Own, written by Richard Matheson – in which a writer (Keenan Wynn) makes events come true by dictating them into a tape recorder. At the end, Serling comes out to remark how obviously ridiculous and nonsensical the whole idea is – prompting Wynn to toss Rod’s piece of dictation tape into the fireplace. Serling calmly says “Well, that’s the way it goes,” and vanishes.

Yeah, I need to get out of the house more – what’s your point? :smiley:

so the family stands around the tree & the good daughter handles the mulch that was her naughty sister & we see the Arcadia Mulching Service truck go on…

and it keeps going across this wilderness till it stops outside a
run-down town & opens up to release… the misbehaving teens who are
met by outcast teens coming out of the buildings.

“But aren’t you going to kill us?”

“Kill you?!?!? This is America! Of course, everyone else back
home THINKS your dead. So stay here, be happy but don’t try to come back.” And the driver takes off.

RE the mid-80s TZ attempt- my two favorites- the trucker of damned souls who starts rescuing those who were damned unjustly & refers to
Jesus’s three days in Hell as his rationale; and the time-travel attempt to rescus JFK… that WORKS!

The revival of The Twilight Zone in the 80’s worked for several reasons already mentioned above, and a couple more.

First, there are the twist endings. There were many episodes with twist endings, but hardly all. My obviously imperfect recollection of those enormously long Memorial Day marathons of a few years ago on SciFi tell me that maybe only a little over half of the original episodes had the twist endings. A relatively small number of episodes has been in regular rotation since, and those contain almost exclusively the twisters. The focus Alfred Hitchcock Presents was twist endings–every episode had to have one–in The Twilight Zone the focus of the stories was the moral character of people in extreme situations. The 80’s revival abandoned completely the idea that a story needs a twist–they just tried to tell good stories.

Second was the length of the stories. The 80’s revival was from the start an hour long show that let each story find it’s own length, and edited and assembled the stories into hour blocks. As someone mentioned before, this could result in stories of wildly differing lengths. I remember an episode with three stories, one about 35 minutes, a second that was at most 5 (and one of my favorites), and a third of about 20. By starting with the premise that the length of the teleplay should grow out of the needs of the story, cutting or padding to make a certain length was kept to a minimum. The more recent revival makes it obvious that the producers care more about making half-hour episodes friendly for the lucrative syndication market than producing good stories. This is a legitimate concern; without a way to make a profit, no show gets made in the first place, and in today’s tv market, a hit show makes more in syndication than first run prime time. But you have to make a show people want to watch first. The first story could have worked better (still not well, but better) had it been ten minutes shorter.

People have picked apart the second story more than the first, so I’ll focus on the first. It’s an obvious ripoff of the great The Stepford Wives, with a little “Make Room, Make Room” (a great story made into the mediocre movie Soylent Green) thrown in for the ‘twist’ at the end.

As for comparisons to the more recent version of The Outer Limits, I actually find the newer version often better than the original.

For example: In one episode, [spoilers] a man is sent back in time to prevent a plague that has wiped out most of the earth. His job is to find patient X–a woman who accidently came into contact with three unrelated people and picked up pathogens from them which interacted in her body and mutated into the deadly plague–and kill her. Once he meets her, he finds she’s a pretty decent person, and decides on a different course of action: he’ll keep her from meeting the other three, even if it means killing one of them instead. There are elements of 12 Monkeys, The City on the Edge of Forever, The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas, and Time Patrol used here, but it works because it takes the time to let us get to know the characters to the point that we care for them.

My favorites from the revival of the 80’s Twilight Zone:

“A Game of Pool”: A remake of the classic original series episode that works because it uses viewers’ knowledge of the original against them with an altered ending that depends as much upon the changed atitude of a character for its impact as it does on the plot.

A man is chosen to be the companion for the first true artificial human intelligence, represented visually by a hologram of a girl. He is at first a parent, then an equal companion, then a willing student as the AI and the hologram age and mature. The two main characters end up having all of the major types of relationships with each other over the relatively short course of the AI’s life.

In the roughly 5 minute episode I mentioned earlier, a man is on a picnic with his girlfriend/wife, having a nice, peaceful afternoon. He wakes up to find himself in a grim, antiseptic future where being hooked up to artificial worlds like this are the only way such things can be experienced. He is warned that he almost stayed in too long and got lost permanently in the fantasy, and the obvious happens, but because it happens so quickly and isn’t padded to make a half-hour for syndication, it works very well.

“The Cold Equations” A leftover segment that was filmed but hadn’t been used when the show was cancelled, it was later reedited for the syndicated version. This episode of The Twilight Zone is simply the most moving thing I’ve ever seen on television, bar none. The movie length remake on SciFi pales by comparison.

Number Six, we agree on the high quality of the 1980’s Zone revival, and I can think of several other shows that were absolutely brilliant.

A few observations:

**

You’re thinking of Alan Brennert’s lovely and touching “Her Pilgrim Soul,” which for me was the high water-mark of the revived Zone. You’re not remembering the plot quite correctly – the woman’s human soul appears, unbidden, in a holographic display invented by the lead character, and part of the story’s mystery is why she’s there – but in the main, you have it. This was and still is my favorite episode of ANY version of Zone, and I guard my decaying VHS tape of it zealously.

In fact, “The Cold Equations” had not been filmed when the CBS network run ended. The script, however, had been written for that run by Alan Brennert, and it was taken up by the producers of the syndicated series for production. It should be noted, by the way, that MGM very much wanted the ending to be changed (making it what writer Brennert called “The Lukewarm Equations”), and were fought tooth and nail by the producers; fortunately, CBS, owners of the show, backed them up.

A few other gems that come to mind:

“Cold Reading”: A 1940s radio adventure show dissolves into chaos when one of the sound man’s props – an African tribal talisman – makes the sound effects used on the show very authentic indeed…

“Nightcrawlers”: The scariest damn thing I’ve ever seen on network television, Robert McCammon’s short story of a Vietnam vet who brings the war home in a very personal, and deadly way. Brilliantly directed by William Friedkin.

“Dead Run”: About a trucker who gets a job ferrying souls to Hell… and discovers that the wrong people are in charge of routing deliveries…

“Paladin of the Lost Hour”: A lovely adaptation by Harlan Ellison of his own short story, about a dying old man who possesses a pocketwatch that hold’s the universe’s final hour.

I haven’t seen the new one (don’t know that I want to). But I am quite an aficionado of the originals. Therefore, I have to ask…

Are they following the same thematic philosophy that led Serling to this format in the first place; i.e. placing the stories in “The Twilight Zone” in order to broach taboo topics? Let’s face it, The Monsters Are Due On Maple Street is not about Martians, it’s about McCarthyism and prejudice and bigoted paranoia. Just not in so many words.

If the writers and directors are merely throwing bogeymen and weirdness at the viewers, of course it’s not going to play as well, or have the satisfying quirkiness of the original. At the same time, in 2002, are there any taboo subjects left that would require a Zoning? Perhaps we as a society have already passed that signpost up ahead…

Hi, DAVE . Been a while since dinner at the 2001 NYC Mega-Fest, long time no.

I don’t want to judge the new Zone’s commitment to following Serling’s lead in dealing with taboo subjects yet – after all, there’s only been one episode broadcast. Certainly, though, the premiere episode’s stories weren’t exactly what I’d call “dangerous visions.”

As to the relevance of the Zone formula to today’s world – I confess I’ve wondered about that myself. Not only are we harder to shock, but modern reality is a lot closer to The Twilight Zone than it was in the safe, staid 50s and early 60s. I also have a sneaking fear that the kind of allegorical story that Serling, Matheson, Beaumont, et al did so beautifully (and practically invented) doesn’t play very well to the sensibilities of anyone born in, say, the past thirty years. Which would be a shame.

And as for even getting those subjects on TV anymore, let me quote Alan Brennert, discussing the troubles the staff of the 80s Zone revival had with the network censors:

Well, yeah, the old Twilight Zone shows really, in spite of the fantasy/science fiction overlay, were morality plays. People find themselves either facing the consequences of their past actions, or forced to make moral choices and deal with the consequences of those choices. The new show hasn’t done that so far, in my opinion, but I want to give it a few weeks, myself. It might get better.

This also sounds like it bears a passing resemblance to The Beckoning Fair One by Oliver Onions. But then, the description is rather vague.

Speaking as a 22 year old who never saw the Twilight Zone when origionally aired…

You have to cut the new series some slack. Yes, the endings were predictable, but I could tell you the ending of about 90% of the origional TZ episodes the first time I saw them based on all the sci fi short stories and Outer Limits I’ve read and seen. The ironic twist at the end may have been daring and unique back in the day, but it’s not uncommon now.
There are two choices: retain the ironic tag and morality play in the tradition of the old TZ or abandon the irony. Niether choice will be free of criticism. They chose to stick with the old style and get criticized because the twists are predictable because of the culture, not necessarily the writing. If they abandoned the twists they would be crucified for betraying the vision of the origional series.

That being said, if I ever see another variation on Death Takes a Holiday, I will retch.

Just though I’d mention that “The Cold Equations” was originally an Astounding short story by Tom Godwin published in 1954. I haven’t seen the Twilight Zone adaptation, but I’m pleased that it sounds like they succeeded in capturing the power of this piece.

A chilling, but spot-on analysis, my man. Truly, the original Zone was a product of its time; a combination of politics, society, writers and artists that can’t be duplicated or replicated.

As far as the sensibilities of Generation X (or Y, or whatever chromosome you choose), you may be right there, as well. This makes the original episodes almost museum pieces, which, while dated, still retain a certain luster and charm to any generation of viewers.

Reminds me of when I decided to finally read Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde a few years ago. I thought, “Well, it’s a classic, and I really liked Treasure Island, so maybe this will be enjoyable, too.”

I was bored stiff, since I already knew what the payoff was. Yes, it was well-written, yes, I can acknowledge it’s a classic and that it set the world on its ear way back when, but…

Et tu, Rod?

Actually, I’m quite certain it was a woman plugged into the machine. Yes, a terrifically concise story.

This link brings back good memories:

  • “Dealer’s Choice” with Morgan Freeman, Dan Hedaya, Garrett Morris, and M. Emmett Walsh!
  • “The Misfortune Cookie” with Elliot Gould as a nasty food critic.
  • Vampires & werewolves in “Monsters!” with Ralph Bellamy
  • The already mentioned (and quite terrifying) “Nightcrawlers”
  • “A Little Piece & Quiet” about a housewife (Melinda Dillon) who stops time
  • FriarTed mentioned “Profile in Silver” with Lane Smith–perhaps the best exclamation of the paradox of altering the future I’ve ever heard.

and perhaps my favorite of all:

“I of Newton” with Ron Glass as the Devil, in a short (5 minutes), hilarious variation of the soul-selling theme.