I pointed at that paper, and I ignored nothing. It seems, however, that everyone is misinterpreting the reason for me posting the link. I apologise for not being clear.
So let me try to state this a little more clearly.
1/ Anthropogenic Global warming is real.
2/ If there were an imminent glaciation in the next few thousand years AGW would act to delay it, or prevent it altogether.
3/ The people who wrote the article and papers in my link have studied the Milankovitch cycles and indicate that the next major glaciation may be as much as 50,000 years from now.
4/ Therefore AGW will probably not act to delay the next glaciation, as there probably wont be any significant reserves of fossil fuels left in 50,000 years time.
5/ However, I should add, that not everyone agrees with Berger and Loutre; the exact effects of the Milankovitch cycles are not completely clear (unless I am mistaken).
Nothing in this chain of reasoning “ignores several conclusions and common understanding of what CO2 is doing to the temperature of the earth”. Please don’t assume that any information about climate that might be mildly unexpected is necessarily being presented by a denier of AGW; this is definitely not the case.
Google shows 4 instances of “EARTHSHAKING SCIENTIFIC BREAKTHROUGH”, one of which is this topic, so you would get 3 dimes, except none of the hits are news stories. So you get no dimes.
As for the matter at hand, more serious conservative media is not falling for this item:
The point stands, the solar scientists may be correct about their model, correct about the conclusion about what the sun will do, but it remains mostly a magnetic issue, the attempt at making this a very important effect that will change the course of the currently observed global warming does not follow from the research that was done. And it is telling that the lead scientist had to backpedal and clarified that there was no mention in the research about any ice age coming soon.
I would suggest that the word imminent is misplaced. If AGW is imminent, then the next glaciation wouldn’t be. Yeah, imminent and glaciers don’t go together very well.