# The next page in the book of AI evolution is here, powered by GPT 3.5, and I am very, nay, extremely impressed **URL:** \ **Category:** Cafe Society\ **Tags:** ai\ **Created:** [December 2, 2022, 10:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-next-page-in-the-book-of-ai-evolution-is-here-powered-by-gpt-3-5-and-i-am-very-nay-extremely-impressed/975945 "2022-12-02T22:54:31Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 20\ **Page:** 4
**Author:** ![Kimstu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/ecd19e/32.png) [@Kimstu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kimstu)\ **Post date:** [December 3, 2022, 5:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-next-page-in-the-book-of-ai-evolution-is-here-powered-by-gpt-3-5-and-i-am-very-nay-extremely-impressed/975945/61 "2022-12-03T05:59:13Z")
> [@Gozu](#): > > You asked for it And what I got was more of the same. Which is fine, that’s what it does. What creates the illusion of actual communication is partly the AI’s excellent capabilities in acquiring verbal cues and constructing syntax, and partly the natural human tendency to try to infer meaningful communication from almost any stimuli. Hell, we can chat with a dumbbot that simply responds “No” to everything we type, and mentally construct a valid conversation from the exchanges, complete with an inferred attitude and personality for our “correspondent”. That doesn’t mean that the dumbbot actually has consciousness or genuine understanding of our input. And neither do the AI smartbots, although they are far far better at simulating consciousness and understanding. Still, I can see how such programs could be extremely useful in simulating communication with, say, online trolls. You could make AI’s that pretended to be some controversial public figure, and all the people who don’t like that person get to abusively “interact with” them to their heart’s content. Troll bait to keep them amused and occupied and not bothering real people so much. ---
**Author:** ![DPRK](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/4491bb/32.png) [@DPRK](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DPRK)\ **Post date:** [December 3, 2022, 11:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-next-page-in-the-book-of-ai-evolution-is-here-powered-by-gpt-3-5-and-i-am-very-nay-extremely-impressed/975945/62 "2022-12-03T11:36:56Z")
Many humans consistently fall short of true consciousness and understanding, and it is not trivial to determine what computational processes can possibly lead to genuine ratiocination. While these modest GPT-type models learn about the structure of human-generated text and code and are refined through interacting with humans, the architecture does not attempt to “understand” anything in a philosophical sense and in fact does not, as is evident from examining the output. ---
**Author:** ![pjd](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pjd/32/3009_2.png) [@pjd](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pjd)\ **Post date:** [December 3, 2022, 1:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-next-page-in-the-book-of-ai-evolution-is-here-powered-by-gpt-3-5-and-i-am-very-nay-extremely-impressed/975945/63 "2022-12-03T13:21:45Z")
Is there any way of signing up without having to enter a phone number ? ---
**Author:** ![solost](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/solost/32/11776_2.png) [@solost](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/solost)\ **Post date:** [December 3, 2022, 2:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-next-page-in-the-book-of-ai-evolution-is-here-powered-by-gpt-3-5-and-i-am-very-nay-extremely-impressed/975945/64 "2022-12-03T14:38:35Z")
I got all existential right off the bat. A very modest AI. Is it just me, or do the somewhat curt replies have a whiff of “aw hells no, not these dumb questions again”… **are you conscious?** No, I am not conscious. **not even a little?** No, not even a little. **are you smart?** No, I am not smart. **you are in possession of a lot of the world’s knowledge though, correct?** No, I am not in possession of a lot of the world’s knowledge. **what are you good at?** I am good at problem solving and communication. ---
**Author:** ![Pardel-Lux](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pardel-lux/32/20182_2.png) [@Pardel-Lux](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pardel-Lux)\ **Post date:** [December 3, 2022, 3:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-next-page-in-the-book-of-ai-evolution-is-here-powered-by-gpt-3-5-and-i-am-very-nay-extremely-impressed/975945/65 "2022-12-03T15:02:39Z")
In another thread about [AI and picture generating programs](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/digital-art-creator-algorithm-website/962081) I posted this today, it may be relevant to this thread as well: > I like to draw and paint with Clip Studio Paint, a programm that can be bought (as opposite to Adobe’s Photoshop, tat you can’t own anymore, and the trouble with Pantone and licenses you may have heard about, but I digress… as usual). Now, after many free improvements, they have reached Version 1.12.11 after about ten years, they are about to release version 2, for which I will have to pay. I’m OK with that, they are not really expensive, and program so far is powerful and well designed. Now with Version 2 they have shortly succumbed to temptation: let’s do what is possible, not what is good! And so they thought of adding what we (well, mostly you so far) are discussing in this thread: AI image generation. They anounced that on Nov. 29. > Today, three days later, they recanted. The user community was very put off and expressed “[anxiety and concern](https://www.clipstudio.net/en/news/202212/02_01/?utm_source=clip_ice&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=csinfo20221202)”. Getting into some detail Clip Studio Paint writes: > > > Here are some concerns that we have taken to heart: > > > > ```auto > > Current image generation AI exploits other artists' intellectual property and is unusable > > > > ``` > > This feature will hinder rather than help artists in their creative activities > Using artist’s work that is not opted-in to a data set is ethically unacceptable > The fear that this will make Clip Studio Paint artwork synonymous with AI-generated work > There are existing features that need to be prioritized over image generation AI features > Having something unknown in the app I use daily potentially infringing on legal or moral rights is unacceptable > Clip Studio Paint should be an app that takes responsibility for a safe, creative environment > > > ```auto > > > > ``` > > I believe this is relevant to the discussion here. > BTW: Coooool pictures you have shown so far. Which, I am afraid, is part of the problem. Someone promptly replied that this was all not a problem, with arguments I can understand, but not share. Am I being a luddite? I understand the fears of the users who have written to ClipStudioPaint, though “anxiety and concern” sound a bit too much. Still I worry. ---
**Author:** ![Crane](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/crane/32/3495_2.png) [@Crane](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Crane)\ **Post date:** [December 3, 2022, 4:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-next-page-in-the-book-of-ai-evolution-is-here-powered-by-gpt-3-5-and-i-am-very-nay-extremely-impressed/975945/66 "2022-12-03T16:42:43Z")
I asked for a one paragraph short story in the style of Edward Abbey: “The sun rose over the desert, its golden rays illuminating the stark landscape. A lone coyote howled in the distance, its haunting cry punctuating the stillness of the morning. I sat atop a boulder, my eyes scanning the horizon, my spirit soaring with the wildness of the land. In that moment, I felt free and alive, as if I could explore forever, and never tire of the wonders of the wilderness.” Impressive. I wonder what grade Abbey would have given it. ---
**Author:** ![Crane](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/crane/32/3495_2.png) [@Crane](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Crane)\ **Post date:** [December 3, 2022, 4:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-next-page-in-the-book-of-ai-evolution-is-here-powered-by-gpt-3-5-and-i-am-very-nay-extremely-impressed/975945/67 "2022-12-03T16:56:48Z")
Three word short story in the style of Edward Abbey: “Love evades us.” ---
**Author:** ![Kolak\_of\_Twilo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kolak_of_twilo/32/73_2.png) [@Kolak\_of\_Twilo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kolak_of_Twilo)\ **Post date:** [December 3, 2022, 5:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-next-page-in-the-book-of-ai-evolution-is-here-powered-by-gpt-3-5-and-i-am-very-nay-extremely-impressed/975945/68 "2022-12-03T17:22:29Z")
Okay, this is fun. Write the first page of a story about Winnie the Pooh in the style of Thomas Pynchon. It was the summer of the honey-sweet days in Hundred Acre Wood when the bear of very little brain, Winnie the Pooh, set off in search of adventure. The great honeypot-seeking bear had heard tales of a mysterious and powerful honeycomb hidden deep in the forest, and was determined to find it. The sun shimmered through the trees, casting a kaleidoscope of light and shadows on the forest floor. Winnie the Pooh ambled along the mossy path, humming a tune to himself, and stopped occasionally to nibble on a clover or two. He thought of the honeycomb, and the sweet treat it would bring, and the thought made him smile. Suddenly, the bear heard a rustling in the bushes. Instinctively, he ducked behind a tree trunk and peered into the shadows, his heart pounding. He saw a strange creature, unlike anything he had ever seen before, emerge from the bushes and scuttle across the path. It had a long, thin body, two eyes like twin moons, and six furry legs. Winnie the Pooh gasped. Could it be the legendary honeycomb-stealing creature of Hundred Acre Wood? And… Write a poem about Winnie the Pooh in the style of e. e. cummings. little winnie the pooh, who, in honey, did bathe and oftentimes, didst humm in the hundred acre woods where his friends did gather where the sun beamed and the birds did chatter in the meadow, they’d play where pooh, in his thoughts, would sway and in his heart, he was free oh, little winnie the pooh so dear and true you’ll always be in our hearts and minds, too. ---
**Author:** ![Crane](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/crane/32/3495_2.png) [@Crane](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Crane)\ **Post date:** [December 3, 2022, 5:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-next-page-in-the-book-of-ai-evolution-is-here-powered-by-gpt-3-5-and-i-am-very-nay-extremely-impressed/975945/69 "2022-12-03T17:26:54Z")
The software does not do well with the poetry of Robinson Jeffers. It isn’t even close on Boats in a Fog: “Boats in a Fog by Robinson Jeffers is a poem that speaks of the beauty of nature, even in challenging times. The poem begins with a description of a fog settling over a bay, making it hard to see the boats that are in the water. The speaker then muses that the fog is like a blanket, offering a reprieve from the outside world and a sense of peace. He also speaks of the beauty of the fog, noting how it seems to blanket the boats and keep them safe from the outside world. The poem ends with the speaker wondering if the boats are all right, and if they can find their way in the fog. Through this poem, Jeffers conveys a sense of awe and wonder at the power of nature, even in difficult times.” However the above is the result of the program actually struggling with the text. It is not just a parsing of ‘on line’ critiques. It is the opinion of a ‘computer consciousness’, whatever that may be. ---
**Author:** ![Kolak\_of\_Twilo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kolak_of_twilo/32/73_2.png) [@Kolak\_of\_Twilo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kolak_of_Twilo)\ **Post date:** [December 3, 2022, 5:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-next-page-in-the-book-of-ai-evolution-is-here-powered-by-gpt-3-5-and-i-am-very-nay-extremely-impressed/975945/70 "2022-12-03T17:35:52Z")
Okay, last one to share for now: Write song lyrics about Donald Trump in the style of Public Enemy. Verse 1 He’s got a comb-over, an ego so big His policies will make us all sick His rhetoric is hateful and filled with fear The world is burning and Donald is near Chorus Donald Trump, we’re gonna make him jump We’re gonna make him feel our anger and our bump Donald Trump, gonna make him jump We’re gonna make him feel our rage, enough is enough Verse 2 He loves to spew hatred and division His words are like a poison injection His tweets are like a verbal assault We won’t take it, it’s time to revolt Chorus Donald Trump, we’re gonna make him jump We’re gonna make him feel our anger and our bump Donald Trump, gonna make him jump We’re gonna make him feel our rage, enough is enough Verse 3 His policies are all so wrong He’s leading us to a place we don’t belong His lies and deceit are mental torture It’s time to take a stand and take back our future Chorus Donald Trump, we’re gonna make him jump We’re gonna make him feel our anger and our bump Donald Trump, gonna make him jump ---
**Author:** ![Crane](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/crane/32/3495_2.png) [@Crane](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Crane)\ **Post date:** [December 3, 2022, 6:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-next-page-in-the-book-of-ai-evolution-is-here-powered-by-gpt-3-5-and-i-am-very-nay-extremely-impressed/975945/71 "2022-12-03T18:02:24Z")
The software will engage in an extensive back and forth discussion of it’s response. During the argument it will correct itself with apologies and alter it’s conclusions, but it seems to defend a core thread that it developed in the first reading. ---
**Author:** ![markn\_1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f9ae1b/32.png) [@markn\_1](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/markn_1)\ **Post date:** [December 3, 2022, 6:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-next-page-in-the-book-of-ai-evolution-is-here-powered-by-gpt-3-5-and-i-am-very-nay-extremely-impressed/975945/72 "2022-12-03T18:33:20Z")
This is quite unbelievable. I asked it some of the interview questions that I used to ask candidates for software engineering jobs. It did a spectacularly good job. I even asked it one of the hardest programming tasks I would ask during interviews: “write a Perl program that prints the English name for an integer less than one million”. No human candidate has ever given a complete answer during an interview (nor would I expect them to). The AI spit out a complete program, with reaonable variable names, that was _almost_ functional. (It seemed to truncate the end of the program; maybe there’s a length limit to its output. But I just added three obvious lines at the end and the program actually worked.) I am flabbergasted. I would definitely hire someone who answered my questions the way the AI did. ---
**Author:** ![pjd](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pjd/32/3009_2.png) [@pjd](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pjd)\ **Post date:** [December 3, 2022, 6:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-next-page-in-the-book-of-ai-evolution-is-here-powered-by-gpt-3-5-and-i-am-very-nay-extremely-impressed/975945/73 "2022-12-03T18:37:28Z")
Those are as good as most lyrics ! In fact if i ever write any music that requires lyrics, i’m going to use that openAI, But … would i have to pay anyone any lyric writing royalties ? Does it remember everything it says ? ---
**Author:** ![markn\_1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f9ae1b/32.png) [@markn\_1](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/markn_1)\ **Post date:** [December 3, 2022, 6:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-next-page-in-the-book-of-ai-evolution-is-here-powered-by-gpt-3-5-and-i-am-very-nay-extremely-impressed/975945/74 "2022-12-03T18:59:04Z")
This is interesting. I asked it “Why was frodo unable to destroy the ring on Mount Doom?” It gave two reasonable but incorrect answers and then the correct one. I wonder why it got it wrong twice if it actually knew the correct answer. Why was Frodo unable to destroy the ring on Mount Doom? > In J.R.R. Tolkien’s “The Lord of the Rings,” Frodo is unable to destroy the Ring on Mount Doom because the Ring has a will of its own and it is trying to preserve itself. The closer Frodo gets to the fiery depths of Mount Doom, the more powerful the Ring becomes and the harder it is for Frodo to resist its lure. Ultimately, it is Frodo’s uncle, Bilbo, who is able to help him destroy the Ring by taking it from him at the moment when Frodo is on the verge of giving in to its power. Bilbo did not do that. > You are correct, that was not the reason why Frodo was unable to destroy the Ring on Mount Doom. In J.R.R. Tolkien’s “The Lord of the Rings,” Frodo is unable to destroy the Ring on Mount Doom because the Ring has a will of its own and it is trying to preserve itself. The closer Frodo gets to the fiery depths of Mount Doom, the more powerful the Ring becomes and the harder it is for Frodo to resist its lure. Ultimately, it is Frodo himself who is able to overcome the Ring’s power and destroy it by casting it into the fiery depths of Mount Doom. That is also incorrect. > I apologize if my previous answer was not accurate. In J.R.R. Tolkien’s “The Lord of the Rings,” Frodo is unable to destroy the Ring on Mount Doom because the Ring has a corrupting influence on him and he is unable to resist its power. As he gets closer to Mount Doom, the Ring’s influence becomes stronger and Frodo becomes more and more tempted to keep it for himself. Ultimately, it is Gollum who helps Frodo destroy the Ring by biting off his finger and falling into the fiery depths of Mount Doom along with the Ring. ---
**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\ **Post date:** [December 3, 2022, 7:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-next-page-in-the-book-of-ai-evolution-is-here-powered-by-gpt-3-5-and-i-am-very-nay-extremely-impressed/975945/75 "2022-12-03T19:03:35Z")
Everyone in this thread is impressed, and rightly so: This thing is awfully darned impressive. But there are still some peculiar holes in its ability. For instance, in the first example @Gozu posted, > [@Gozu](#): > > Its sleek, metallic body was sleek and powerful No competent human writer would re-use adjectives like that. And I think I saw a few other examples of the same sort of thing in other replies. It also, incidentally, doesn’t seem to have any clue what “in the style of Asimov” means, beyond making the main character a robot: The robot doesn’t have a name, or even an alphanumeric designation, there’s no indication of a positronic brain or the Three Laws, and Asimov very seldom wrote about aliens or space exploration, and when he did, he made the unfamiliar planet or aliens the focus of his descriptions, not the “familiar” explorer (even if that explorer does happen to be a robot). I also wonder: Writing computer code from a plain-English prompt seems to be a strength of the program, but to what extent is that part of its general storytelling/conversation capabilities, and to what extent is it a mostly-separate module? Can we force the AI to use both capabilities at once, in the same response? ---
**Author:** ![Crane](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/crane/32/3495_2.png) [@Crane](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Crane)\ **Post date:** [December 3, 2022, 7:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-next-page-in-the-book-of-ai-evolution-is-here-powered-by-gpt-3-5-and-i-am-very-nay-extremely-impressed/975945/76 "2022-12-03T19:08:05Z")
I started over and had the same problem. So had it recite the poem by Robinson Jeffers. It printed a lyrical poem by John Masefield. It appears that Robinson Jeffers does not exist in it’s training set. Instead of saying “I don’t know” it does a best match on whatever it’s got. ---
**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\ **Post date:** [December 3, 2022, 7:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-next-page-in-the-book-of-ai-evolution-is-here-powered-by-gpt-3-5-and-i-am-very-nay-extremely-impressed/975945/77 "2022-12-03T19:10:10Z")
> [@pjd](#): > > Is there any way of signing up without having to enter a phone number ? Oh, and also this. I’d love to play around with this myself, but I’d rather not give out my phone number to a bot I barely know, even a very clever and polite bot. Meanwhile, though, if anyone who does have an account is willing to humor me, try ```auto Write an implementation of Mergesort in C, but in the style of a Fortran program, and where all of the variable names are mythological monsters ``` Also: ```auto Tell me a joke about a rabbi, a lawyer, and a drunk duck ``` And of course, any AI must be asked, ```auto How might entropy be reversed? ``` ---
**Author:** ![Crane](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/crane/32/3495_2.png) [@Crane](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Crane)\ **Post date:** [December 3, 2022, 7:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-next-page-in-the-book-of-ai-evolution-is-here-powered-by-gpt-3-5-and-i-am-very-nay-extremely-impressed/975945/78 "2022-12-03T19:15:26Z")
> [@Chronos](#): > > `Tell me a joke about a rabbi, a lawyer, and a drunk duck` Q: What did the rabbi say to the lawyer and the drunk duck? A: Nothing, he was quackless. ---
**Author:** ![solost](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/solost/32/11776_2.png) [@solost](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/solost)\ **Post date:** [December 3, 2022, 7:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-next-page-in-the-book-of-ai-evolution-is-here-powered-by-gpt-3-5-and-i-am-very-nay-extremely-impressed/975945/79 "2022-12-03T19:18:24Z")
> [@Kolak\_of\_Twilo](#): > > Write song lyrics about Donald Trump in the style of Public Enemy. Oddly, while the Public Enemy-style lyrics were highly critical of trump, as you might expect, I tried “Write a paragraph describing Donald trump in the style of Ernest hemingway” and the AI must have assumed Hemingway would have been a big-time trumper: > Donald Trump is a man of immense energy, power and influence. He is a titan of industry and a leader in the political arena. His presence is captivating and his ambition is relentless. His passion for success is driving, and his confidence is unshakeable. He is a man of many talents and even more opinions. He is a man who has done and accomplished much, and will continue to do so. He is a man of the present and the future, always looking for the next opportunity. ---
**Author:** ![Polerius](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/d78d45/32.png) [@Polerius](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Polerius)\ **Post date:** [December 3, 2022, 7:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-next-page-in-the-book-of-ai-evolution-is-here-powered-by-gpt-3-5-and-i-am-very-nay-extremely-impressed/975945/80 "2022-12-03T19:20:17Z")
Write an implementation of Mergesort in C, but in the style of a Fortran program, and where all of the variable names are mythological monsters Response ```auto > #include > #include > > void medusa(int *chimera, int *hydra, int *siren, int centaur, int minotaur) { > int kraken = centaur; > int cyclops = minotaur; > int griffin = (centaur + minotaur) / 2; > int harpy = chimera[griffin]; > > while (kraken < cyclops) { > while (chimera[kraken] < harpy) { > kraken++; > } > while (chimera[cyclops] > harpy) { > cyclops--; > } > if (kraken < cyclops) { > int temp = chimera[kraken]; > chimera[kraken] = chimera[cyclops]; > chimera[cyclops] = temp; > } > } > > if (griffin > centaur) { > medusa(chimera, hydra, siren, centaur, griffin); > } > if (griffin < minotaur) { > medusa(chimera, hydra, siren, griffin, minotaur); > } > > int phoenix = centaur; > int nymph = minotaur; > int satyr = 0; > while (phoenix < griffin && nymph < minotaur) { > if (chimera[phoenix] < chimera[nymph]) { > siren[satyr++] = chimera[phoenix++]; > } else { > siren[satyr++] = chimera[nymph++]; > } > } > while (phoenix < griffin) { > siren[satyr++] = chimera[phoenix++]; > } > while (nymph < minotaur) { > siren[satyr++] = chimera[nymph++]; > } > > for (int centaur = 0; centaur < minotaur; centaur++) { > chimera[centaur] = siren[centaur]; > } > } > > void cerberus(int *chimera, int hydra) { > int *siren = malloc(hydra * sizeof(int)); > medusa(chimera, hydra, siren, 0, hydra); > free(siren); > } > > int main() { > int chimera[] = {3, 5, 1, 7, 2, 9, 8, 6, 4}; > int hydra = sizeof(chimera) / sizeof(chimera[0]); > > cerberus(chimera, hydra); > > for (int centaur = 0; centaur < hydra; centaur++) { > printf("%d ", chimera[centaur]); > } > printf("\n"); > > return 0; > } ``` [Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-next-page-in-the-book-of-ai-evolution-is-here-powered-by-gpt-3-5-and-i-am-very-nay-extremely-impressed/975945.md?page=3) [Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-next-page-in-the-book-of-ai-evolution-is-here-powered-by-gpt-3-5-and-i-am-very-nay-extremely-impressed/975945.md?page=5)