# The next page in the book of AI evolution is here, powered by GPT 3.5, and I am very, nay, extremely impressed **URL:** \ **Category:** Cafe Society\ **Tags:** ai\ **Created:** [December 2, 2022, 10:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-next-page-in-the-book-of-ai-evolution-is-here-powered-by-gpt-3-5-and-i-am-very-nay-extremely-impressed/975945 "2022-12-02T22:54:31Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 1403
**Author:** ![Half\_Man\_Half\_Wit](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/half_man_half_wit/32/21766_2.png) [@Half\_Man\_Half\_Wit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Half_Man_Half_Wit)\ **Post date:** [March 31, 2023, 4:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-next-page-in-the-book-of-ai-evolution-is-here-powered-by-gpt-3-5-and-i-am-very-nay-extremely-impressed/975945/1403 "2023-03-31T04:33:17Z")
> [@Babale](#): > > So is everything else, aparts from elementary particles, or perhaps the fields that form them (or perhaps there are even deeper levels for us to discover someday). Ok? You’re saying this like it’s somehow in conflict with what I said, but I can’t see how? > [@Babale](#): > > And how will you move the goalposts further to account for PALM-E, which has access to relationships between words but also vision and sound and touch, and the relationship between vision and sound and touch and words? If there’s just relationships, no goalposts need to be moved, and the proof I gave in the other thread applies unchanged. Even if not, I’ve [given a general argument](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-consciousness-is-not-computation/850402) against the possibility of conscious AI before. --- _[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-next-page-in-the-book-of-ai-evolution-is-here-powered-by-gpt-3-5-and-i-am-very-nay-extremely-impressed/975945)._