# The octuplet woman, crazy, selfish or normal?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-octuplet-woman-crazy-selfish-or-normal/485204>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [February 10, 2009, 1:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-octuplet-woman-crazy-selfish-or-normal/485204 "2009-02-10T13:17:18Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Annie-Xmas](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ecc23a/32.png) [@Annie-Xmas](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Annie-Xmas)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2009, 4:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-octuplet-woman-crazy-selfish-or-normal/485204/21 "2009-02-10T16:22:02Z")

</div>

> [@Rune](#):
>
> Well if she got $2 million, I guess she’s set for life and will have no financial obstacles to giving the children a good life. If she is now financial independent, why is it any different than when various superstars, like Madonna, Angelina Jolie or Mia Farrow trawl the world for babies to adopt. Also I guess she didn’t plan on having eight babies. Perhaps she though one or two would be nice, but was against abortion and so went with the eight.

Madonna, Angelina Jolie and Mia Farrow are not pumping out babies like their vagina are clown cars . They are not getting food stamps to feed their children. They are not raising [del]six[/del] fourteen children in their parents’ three bedroom apartment. They are working mothers who will give their children the value of working, not of living on food stamps and lawsuits.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Antinor01](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ecae2f/32.png) [@Antinor01](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Antinor01)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2009, 4:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-octuplet-woman-crazy-selfish-or-normal/485204/22 "2009-02-10T16:51:50Z")

</div>

I don’t understand the desire to have children anyway, so the concept of having that many on purpose when you clearly don’t have the means to care for them is completely insane to me. My vote is crazy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Blalron](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/35a633/32.png) [@Blalron](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Blalron)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2009, 5:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-octuplet-woman-crazy-selfish-or-normal/485204/23 "2009-02-10T17:00:34Z")

</div>

Even setting aside the issue of her being a drain on public money, how is a single mother going to give all 14 children the individual attention they need?

Unlike the [Duggars](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/17_Kids_and_Counting), who have a “buddy system” going on where older siblings look out for younger ones, 8 kids born at the same time precludes that from being a possibility.

Also, this just isn’t natural. Notice that women only have two boobs. I think that’s natures way of saying that two babies at any given time is all one woman is equipped for.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/stoid/32/272_2.png) [@Stoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stoid)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2009, 5:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-octuplet-woman-crazy-selfish-or-normal/485204/24 "2009-02-10T17:11:17Z")

</div>

Count my vote as crazy. (But I have a bias, I thinking wanting kids at means you have to be just a tad nutty, so this woman is a complete loon.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rune](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e68b1a/32.png) [@Rune](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rune)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2009, 5:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-octuplet-woman-crazy-selfish-or-normal/485204/25 "2009-02-10T17:11:27Z")

</div>

> [@Annie-Xmas](#):
>
> Madonna, Angelina Jolie and Mia Farrow are not pumping out babies like their vagina are clown cars.

Why do you think it is better to adopt your way to 14 children than to birth your way to 14 children – or whatever she did? Why this obsession on what she uses her vagina for? Why does it even concern you? She could smoke cigarettes or shoot out ping-pong balls with her vagina for all that I think it matters.

> [@Annie-Xmas](#):
>
> They are not getting food stamps to feed their children.

So it is the welfare mother angle you find so disagreeable. I agree entirely. All parents should pay their own way. But if she sold her story for $2 million I suppose she is fine now. I don’t know how things are in the US, but around here $2 million would set you up comfortable for life without you having to work a day more. In any case, did she intent for octuplets?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Annie-Xmas](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ecc23a/32.png) [@Annie-Xmas](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Annie-Xmas)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2009, 5:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-octuplet-woman-crazy-selfish-or-normal/485204/26 "2009-02-10T17:18:13Z")

</div>

Yes, I do think raising a child on welfare is a form of child abuse, like raising too many children in too small a house. I’ve seen too many welfare mothers whose children become welfare mothers.

Can $2M support 14 children till adulthood?

While I really don’t care what any woman does with her vagina, but I do think any peson who has children should be able to support them. And I do give kudos to people who adopt children instead of having more of their own.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![you\_with\_the\_face](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/y/ecccb3/32.png) [@you\_with\_the\_face](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/you_with_the_face)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2009, 5:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-octuplet-woman-crazy-selfish-or-normal/485204/27 "2009-02-10T17:21:20Z")

</div>

Don’t like to think of myself as the judgemental type (who does?), but I vote for three parts insane to one part sociopathically selfish.

When hearing her talk about the prudence of having that many kids, her response had all to what she wanted and can do and will be able to do. But what about her kids? Can anyone argue that this is what is best for them?

One part of me feels sorry for her parents but another part makes me question their sanity as well. At some point, like after the 4rd kid, they should have realized their daughter was perhaps a tad addicted to having kids. They could stopped enabling her behavior by kicking her out and forcing her to support herself. Now granted there is _a lot_ that we don’t know about their home situation and I fully realize that, but it seems as if they stood idly by and watched their daughter turn herself into a baby mill. There’s no way I would have put up with that in my golden years.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sarahfeena](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sarahfeena/32/519_2.png) [@Sarahfeena](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sarahfeena)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2009, 5:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-octuplet-woman-crazy-selfish-or-normal/485204/28 "2009-02-10T17:21:46Z")

</div>

> [@Rune](#):
>
> Well if she got $2 million, I guess she’s set for life and will have no financial obstacles to giving the children a good life. If she is now financial independent, why is it any different than when various superstars, like Madonna, Angelina Jolie or Mia Farrow trawl the world for babies to adopt. Also I guess she didn’t plan on having eight babies. Perhaps she though one or two would be nice, but was against abortion and so went with the eight.

Except that with IVF, you have choices to make well before it comes to abortion. You can decide how many eggs to try to fertilize at one time, and you can decide how many to implant at one time. I think it’s insanity to implant 8 embryos at once…I can’t understand a reputable doctor doing it. Usually, when you hear about large sets of multiples, it’s caused by fertility drugs, not by IVF, because with fertility drugs, you don’t have that control over the outcome.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![smiling\_bandit](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e9a140/32.png) [@smiling\_bandit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/smiling_bandit)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2009, 5:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-octuplet-woman-crazy-selfish-or-normal/485204/29 "2009-02-10T17:21:49Z")

</div>

There is nothing wrong with large families!

This particular woman is, in fact, probably more than a little off her rocker judging by some reports I’ve seen of her medical history.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sarahfeena](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sarahfeena/32/519_2.png) [@Sarahfeena](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sarahfeena)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2009, 5:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-octuplet-woman-crazy-selfish-or-normal/485204/30 "2009-02-10T17:27:11Z")

</div>

> [@smiling\_bandit](#):
>
> There is nothing wrong with large families!

I’m usually the first one to defend large families, myself, but in this case, I think that there seems to be no forethought about what was going to happen if all 8 of those babies survived, and now that they have, how she is going to support 14 children. It’s a hell of a lot harder and more expensive than having them one at a time…you have to have supplies for 8 at a time, vs. handing stuff down from one baby to the next. I have a friend who is from a family of 11, and they only ever needed one crib.

> [@](#):
>
> This particular woman is, in fact, probably more than a little off her rocker judging by some reports I’ve seen of her medical history.

I agree.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Excellent](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f19dbf/32.png) [@Mr.Excellent](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Excellent)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2009, 5:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-octuplet-woman-crazy-selfish-or-normal/485204/31 "2009-02-10T17:34:51Z")

</div>

I don’t think this woman is crazy - merely foolish. The problem is, there’s at least _some_ scientific evidence to suggest that the less competent someone is, the less capable they are of _assessing_ their level of competence at a given task. Thus, while most of us look at this woman’s income, housing, and existing family, and conclude she cannot properly support any additional children - she simply can’t assess her own competence to raise children in that way. This is because she’s incompetence.

Cite: [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2000/01/18/MN73840.DTL](http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2000/01/18/MN73840.DTL)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Strassia](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e8c25b/32.png) [@Strassia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Strassia)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2009, 5:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-octuplet-woman-crazy-selfish-or-normal/485204/32 "2009-02-10T17:48:14Z")

</div>

> [@ITR\_champion](#):
>
> This statement doesn’t stand up to logical analysis for half a second. We’re supposed to believe that she took fertility treatments with the goal of having octuplets? Having fertility treatments doesn’t normally lead to octuplets. In fact, prior to this case, there was no case of octuplets all surviving. Hence’s it’s laughable to suppose that she took fertility treatments in order to have octuplets and make money off them.
> 
> There is zero evidence that she suffers any sort of mental problem.

While I don’t think it is proven, her mother has said she is addicted to having babies, and she has admitted that she thought having babies would help with her depression, so that is at least two pieces of evidence.

Jonathan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chase\_Ransom](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/9de0a6/32.png) [@Chase\_Ransom](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chase_Ransom)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2009, 5:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-octuplet-woman-crazy-selfish-or-normal/485204/33 "2009-02-10T17:53:11Z")

</div>

> [@Rune](#):
>
> Why do you think it is better to adopt your way to 14 children than to birth your way to 14 children – or whatever she did?

Actually there is a pretty big difference. Adopting 14 children is allowing 14 kids without a home to have a chance at being a part of a family and all the could-be benefits of this. Having 14 kids when you don’t have the means to care for them, is actually entirely the opposite. It is a solid case for adoption IMO.

That having been said, I don’t think anybody should be prohibited the right to procreate however they think it is best, UNLESS you are promising your offspring a life of misery. But then, people could debate what is miserable and what isn’t.

The 2million she may get for her story is not a valid argument against her sanity, since it happened after the fact. When she decided to go with all 8 embryos (already having 6 kids on wellfare), she excercized poor judgement, exhibited some brand of crazy, and in my opinion, qualifies her as an unfit parent (if for no other reason, a poor example to follow).

The only think I can say in her favor is: So many UNWANTED children are born every day - at least it seems like she really wants these kids (if for the wrong reasons perhaps).

I wish people would let the damn story die.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chase\_Ransom](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/9de0a6/32.png) [@Chase\_Ransom](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chase_Ransom)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2009, 6:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-octuplet-woman-crazy-selfish-or-normal/485204/34 "2009-02-10T18:00:31Z")

</div>

Sorry for the double post but, one last thing: Those 2 million will never cover the cost of raising 14 kids. Just the hospital bills from the birth of the last 8 plus child care for the 14 are going to burn through that money like wildfire. Not taking into account food, shelter, transportation, clothes, etc. Lets not even get into education and what not.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e99b99/32.png) [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Diogenes_the_Cynic)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2009, 6:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-octuplet-woman-crazy-selfish-or-normal/485204/35 "2009-02-10T18:04:41Z")

</div>

Crazy or not, she’s irresponsible as hell.

Those other single moms on welfare are irresponsible too, but this is orders of magnitude worse. The doctor who agreed to do this is just as disgusting. This should be illegal.

I think fertility treatments in general are a vile perversion of nature. Stories about 60 year old women having giant litters of babies already makes my stomach churn. Now this? This is a horrific trend. The world is over-populated as it is.

If these kinds of souped up fertility treatments are going to allowed, there should be a law mandating that no more than one live birth can be allowed to result. Once there’s a viable embryo, all others should be destroyed in vitro.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lieu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/c2a13f/32.png) [@lieu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lieu)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2009, 6:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-octuplet-woman-crazy-selfish-or-normal/485204/36 "2009-02-10T18:06:43Z")

</div>

> [@Strassia](#):
>
> While I don’t think it is proven, her mother has said she is addicted to having babies, and she has admitted that she thought having babies would help with her depression, so that is at least two pieces of evidence.

I’ll go with irresponsible and obsessed with delusional icing for now. If and when she decides to have a few more, off her effin’ rocker.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kaylasdad99](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kaylasdad99/32/3398_2.png) [@kaylasdad99](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kaylasdad99)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2009, 6:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-octuplet-woman-crazy-selfish-or-normal/485204/37 "2009-02-10T18:14:19Z")

</div>

> [@lieu](#):
>
> I’ll go with obsessed with delusional icing for now. If and when she decides to have a few more, off her effin’ rocker.

I heard (relatively) early on in the development of the story that the octuplets reprresent the last eight embryos she had on ice, so it would appear that this will be the last time.

Of course, new information seems to be coming out daily, so that may not still be operative. For all I know, she has several dozen more embryos available. Next time, she might go for twelve, and do it in the full view of the public spotlight.

She could be the David Blaine of IVF moms!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sarahfeena](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sarahfeena/32/519_2.png) [@Sarahfeena](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sarahfeena)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2009, 6:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-octuplet-woman-crazy-selfish-or-normal/485204/38 "2009-02-10T18:18:41Z")

</div>

> [@kaylasdad99](#):
>
> I heard (relatively) early on in the development of the story that the octuplets reprresent the last eight embryos she had on ice, so it would appear that this will be the last time.

I’ve been so curious to know why they didn’t implant them 2 or 3 at a time, vs. all at once…you would think even having 3 sets of twins or triplets would be easier than having 8 all at the same time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kalhoun](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/3bc359/32.png) [@Kalhoun](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kalhoun)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2009, 6:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-octuplet-woman-crazy-selfish-or-normal/485204/39 "2009-02-10T18:19:55Z")

</div>

> [@Sarahfeena](#):
>
> I’ve been so curious to know why they didn’t implant them 2 or 3 at a time, vs. all at once…you would think even having 3 sets of twins or triplets would be easier than having 8 all at the same time.

I thought I heard that she wanted them all implanted so they each had a chance (maybe she figured she couldn’t do any more after this last round).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sarahfeena](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sarahfeena/32/519_2.png) [@Sarahfeena](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sarahfeena)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2009, 6:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-octuplet-woman-crazy-selfish-or-normal/485204/40 "2009-02-10T18:26:46Z")

</div>

> [@Kalhoun](#):
>
> I thought I heard that she wanted them all implanted so they each had a chance (maybe she figured she couldn’t do any more after this last round).

That’s the part I don’t get…if there was a reason the doc thought that she shouldn’t have more than one more pregnancy. Because I know she didn’t want to “waste” any of the embryos, or selectively reduce (which, as you know, I totally get). But it seems like if you are concerned with giving them each a chance, they’d each have MORE of a chance if they were only in there with one or two others, vs. all eight at once.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-octuplet-woman-crazy-selfish-or-normal/485204.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-octuplet-woman-crazy-selfish-or-normal/485204.md?page=3)
