# The Orville-Seth McFarlane

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-orville-seth-mcfarlane/786814>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [May 17, 2017, 3:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-orville-seth-mcfarlane/786814 "2017-05-17T03:28:05Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 30

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Andy\_L](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/c67d28/32.png) [@Andy\_L](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Andy_L)\
**Post date:** [September 26, 2017, 11:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-orville-seth-mcfarlane/786814/581 "2017-09-26T11:30:33Z")

</div>

> [@carnivorousplant](#):
>
> What was the NG episode where Riker was enamored of a “female” of a unisex culture?

“The Outcast” - and Orville, ep 3, was much better than that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![StarvingButStrong](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/starvingbutstrong/32/335_2.png) [@StarvingButStrong](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/StarvingButStrong)\
**Post date:** [September 26, 2017, 1:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-orville-seth-mcfarlane/786814/582 "2017-09-26T13:43:30Z")

</div>

> [@Cat\_Whisperer](#):
>
> True enough. I still hated the way the writers of the show still don’t seem to get something that is common and standard in real science fiction and has been for decades - aliens are _alien._

The thing is, Star Trek has classically used “aliens” to stand-in for “humans who aren’t WASPy males” in order to tell stories about social or racial or political or religious differences and how they’re not very important and can be overcome if you just use some empathy and openness.

Given that the whole point of these little morality tales is “when you come down to it, we are the same despite our differences” you really can’t simultaneously complain that your aliens aren’t really alien.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSYoungEsq](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/c6cbf5/32.png) [@DSYoungEsq](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSYoungEsq)\
**Post date:** [September 26, 2017, 9:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-orville-seth-mcfarlane/786814/583 "2017-09-26T21:08:28Z")

</div>

> [@Cat\_Whisperer](#):
>
> Late to the discussion, but I feel so strongly about the third episode (“About A Girl”) that I’m jumping in anyway - I hated it very much. This has always been a weakness of Star Trek shows (using Earth standards to judge other cultures from other planets), and I was really disappointed to see this show making the same stupid mistake. It’s another goddamned planet, with their own goddamned culture and history and society and everything! The episode was ridiculous and patronizing from beginning to end. :mad:

Apparently you are not much into subtlety. Unlike what _Star Trek_ would have done with the episode, this show treated the issue with some respect. The captain has second-thoughts, mirroring exactly what you are pointing out. The argument to try and get the aliens to change their minds is based upon logic, not emotion or Earth mores. And, in the end, the aliens do the alien thing anyway, and the aliens on the Orville accept, make up with each other, and agree to move forward in a positive way.

By comparison, suppose that, despite his impassioned argument, the Federation had decided to give Data over to the guy who wanted to take him apart. Can you even imagine _Star Trek_ doing that? Being convinced you are right, even in a chauvinistic way, is commonplace (probably among any sentient species). In this show, that didn’t end up being the be-all, end-all of the discussion.

I hope they take on more such topics!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cat\_Whisperer](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cat_whisperer/32/4839_2.png) [@Cat\_Whisperer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cat_Whisperer)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2017, 1:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-orville-seth-mcfarlane/786814/584 "2017-09-27T01:56:06Z")

</div>

> [@StarvingButStrong](#):
>
> The thing is, Star Trek has classically used “aliens” to stand-in for “humans who aren’t WASPy males” in order to tell stories about social or racial or political or religious differences and how they’re not very important and can be overcome if you just use some empathy and openness.
> 
> Given that the whole point of these little morality tales is “when you come down to it, we are the same despite our differences” you really can’t simultaneously complain that your aliens aren’t really alien.

That’s just it; aliens _aren’t_ just funny-looking humans, and the whole crew of The Orville were treating them like they were (to the point of harassing them. It’s kind of odd that another alien would take part in the harassment of the Moclins - I guess she hasn’t realized yet that she’s liable to be subjected to the same harassment when _her_ culture deviates from earth-normal.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cat\_Whisperer](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cat_whisperer/32/4839_2.png) [@Cat\_Whisperer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cat_Whisperer)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2017, 1:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-orville-seth-mcfarlane/786814/585 "2017-09-27T01:59:02Z")

</div>

> [@DSYoungEsq](#):
>
> Apparently you are not much into subtlety. Unlike what _Star Trek_ would have done with the episode, this show treated the issue with some respect. The captain has second-thoughts, mirroring exactly what you are pointing out. The argument to try and get the aliens to change their minds is based upon logic, not emotion or Earth mores. And, in the end, the aliens do the alien thing anyway, and the aliens on the Orville accept, make up with each other, and agree to move forward in a positive way.
> 
> By comparison, suppose that, despite his impassioned argument, the Federation had decided to give Data over to the guy who wanted to take him apart. Can you even imagine _Star Trek_ doing that? Being convinced you are right, even in a chauvinistic way, is commonplace (probably among any sentient species). In this show, that didn’t end up being the be-all, end-all of the discussion.
> 
> I hope they take on more such topics!

My point is more that there shouldn’t have been any drawn-pit discussion in the first place; “Oh, that’s what your culture/society does? Okay.” is what they _should_ have said.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSYoungEsq](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/c6cbf5/32.png) [@DSYoungEsq](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSYoungEsq)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2017, 2:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-orville-seth-mcfarlane/786814/586 "2017-09-27T02:15:33Z")

</div>

> [@Cat\_Whisperer](#):
>
> My point is more that there shouldn’t have been any drawn-pit discussion in the first place; “Oh, that’s what your culture/society does? Okay.” is what they _should_ have said.

So your assertion is that a society shouldn’t question another society’s values when those values run counter to deeply held mores of the first society? In other words, the United States shouldn’t question, say, the (until today) rule in Saudi Arabia that precluded women from driving? That countries that had abolished slavery prior to 1860 shouldn’t have been questioning/condemning the existence of slavery in the United States? I find that quite ridiculous as a basic assertion.

The notion that anything some other culture does that is different from your own is okay, and shouldn’t be questioned is unsupportable, both logically and empirically.

Further, the Moclans are members of a pan-galactic union, which means that they cannot simply hide behind their own customs and demand those customs be accepted without question. Those customs have the potential to influence the interactions of the members of the union. And you will notice that the show did a very good job of finally finding the right way to attempt intervention: rely upon the dispute resolution mechanisms of Moclan itself to deal with the issue. When the decision of the tribunal comes down, the officers of the Orville don’t protest, act disrespectful to the process or result, or otherwise lose sight of the fact that SOME method of resolving disputes has to exist, and its results have to prevail. One might suggest that THAT lesson was far more important for our current situation in the US than anything having to do with gender issues.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2017, 6:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-orville-seth-mcfarlane/786814/587 "2017-09-27T06:34:32Z")

</div>

> [@Cat\_Whisperer](#):
>
> My point is more that there shouldn’t have been any drawn-pit discussion in the first place; “Oh, that’s what your culture/society does? Okay.” is what they _should_ have said.

Except not on the Union ship Orville. The Orville wasnt messing with what the Moclins did on their own planet, but they were arguing about a Union born child, one of whose parents didnt want the operation.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mlees](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ba8739/32.png) [@mlees](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mlees)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2017, 2:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-orville-seth-mcfarlane/786814/588 "2017-09-27T14:00:43Z")

</div>

I was wondering how y’all felt about the Moclin advocate’s argument, comparing a sex change operation on a new-born to something apparently as safe and/or as trivial as circumcision.

This seems to conflict with the underlying assertion (the whole reason for the trial, after all) that this operation MUST be done, because of the social stigma and loss of opportunities the child would suffer later in life.

I was left scratching my head on the contradiction.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Darren\_Garrison](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/darren_garrison/32/92_2.png) [@Darren\_Garrison](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Darren_Garrison)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2017, 2:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-orville-seth-mcfarlane/786814/589 "2017-09-27T14:15:24Z")

</div>

> [@mlees](#):
>
> I was wondering how y’all felt about the Moclin advocate’s argument, comparing a sex change operation on a new-born to something apparently as safe and/or as trivial as circumcision.
> 
> This seems to conflict with the underlying assertion (the whole reason for the trial, after all) that this operation MUST be done, because of the social stigma and loss of opportunities the child would suffer later in life.
> 
> I was left scratching my head on the contradiction.

I don’t see any contradiction in these two positions.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mlees](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ba8739/32.png) [@mlees](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mlees)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2017, 2:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-orville-seth-mcfarlane/786814/590 "2017-09-27T14:24:45Z")

</div>

> [@Darren\_Garrison](#):
>
> I don’t see any contradiction in these two positions.

Have there been societies where circumcision (or lack there-of) resulted in that the male being ostracised?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![carnivorousplant](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/carnivorousplant/32/3563_2.png) [@carnivorousplant](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/carnivorousplant)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2017, 2:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-orville-seth-mcfarlane/786814/591 "2017-09-27T14:28:04Z")

</div>

> [@mlees](#):
>
> Have there been societies where circumcision (or lack there-of) resulted in that the male being ostracised?

Judaism?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mlees](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ba8739/32.png) [@mlees](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mlees)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2017, 2:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-orville-seth-mcfarlane/786814/592 "2017-09-27T14:31:30Z")

</div>

> [@carnivorousplant](#):
>
> Judaism?

Please elaborate. My knowledge of that society/culture is quite limited.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mlees](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ba8739/32.png) [@mlees](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mlees)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2017, 2:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-orville-seth-mcfarlane/786814/593 "2017-09-27T14:49:20Z")

</div>

I think my problem is the misunderstanding of the advocates point.

When I viewed the scene, I thought the advocate was comparing [Human] circumcision to the [Moclin] sex change as being equal in social importance. But he’s not, is he?

Is his argument actually that the sex change is socially important, and since the procedure is as medically safe (trivial, if you will) as circumcision, why object to it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Johnny\_Bravo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnny_bravo/32/493_2.png) [@Johnny\_Bravo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Johnny_Bravo)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2017, 2:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-orville-seth-mcfarlane/786814/594 "2017-09-27T14:55:55Z")

</div>

His argument is that circumcision, like the Moclin sex change, is medically unnecessary but culturally mandated, and that if the Captain doesn’t object to one he shouldn’t object to the other.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mlees](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ba8739/32.png) [@mlees](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mlees)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2017, 3:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-orville-seth-mcfarlane/786814/595 "2017-09-27T15:15:44Z")

</div>

Ok. Thanks! I think I got that straightened out, now!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![carnivorousplant](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/carnivorousplant/32/3563_2.png) [@carnivorousplant](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/carnivorousplant)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2017, 3:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-orville-seth-mcfarlane/786814/596 "2017-09-27T15:16:24Z")

</div>

> [@mlees](#):
>
> Please elaborate. My knowledge of that society/culture is quite limited.

If parents refused to have their child circumcised, I should imagine that there would be some controversy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mlees](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ba8739/32.png) [@mlees](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mlees)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2017, 3:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-orville-seth-mcfarlane/786814/597 "2017-09-27T15:36:47Z")

</div>

> [@carnivorousplant](#):
>
> If parents refused to have their child circumcised, I should imagine that there would be some controversy.

But would that child be prevented from holding a job, marrying, things like that?

(I forget how Boris described what discrimination he thought his child might experience.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![carnivorousplant](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/carnivorousplant/32/3563_2.png) [@carnivorousplant](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/carnivorousplant)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2017, 4:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-orville-seth-mcfarlane/786814/598 "2017-09-27T16:31:13Z")

</div>

> [@mlees](#):
>
> But would that child be prevented from holding a job, marrying, things like that?
> 
> (I forget how Boris described what discrimination he thought his child might experience.)

He probably wouldn’t be able to marry a religious Jew.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RickJay](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/bb73d2/32.png) [@RickJay](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RickJay)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2017, 5:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-orville-seth-mcfarlane/786814/599 "2017-09-27T17:00:27Z")

</div>

> [@Cat\_Whisperer](#):
>
> My point is more that there shouldn’t have been any drawn-pit discussion in the first place; “Oh, that’s what your culture/society does? Okay.” is what they _should_ have said.

I’ll remember that idea the next time there’s a report in Canada of a young girl undergoing female genital mutilation, and see how okay you are with it.

Oh, no? You won’t be?

Well, there’s the rub. Values conflict, and sometimes that conflict can’t be resolved.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![billfish678](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/7bcc69/32.png) [@billfish678](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/billfish678)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2017, 5:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-orville-seth-mcfarlane/786814/600 "2017-09-27T17:03:24Z")

</div>

> [@mlees](#):
>
> Please elaborate. My knowledge of that society/culture is quite limited.

I think it has something to do with cold pools and marble rye bread…

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-orville-seth-mcfarlane/786814.md?page=29)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-orville-seth-mcfarlane/786814.md?page=31)
