# The phrase "just want a level playing field"

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-phrase-just-want-a-level-playing-field/420137>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [September 22, 2007, 9:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-phrase-just-want-a-level-playing-field/420137 "2007-09-22T21:51:11Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 5\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pret-a-Poster](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/8c91f0/32.png) [@Pret-a-Poster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pret-a-Poster)\
**Post date:** [September 22, 2007, 9:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-phrase-just-want-a-level-playing-field/420137/1 "2007-09-22T21:51:11Z")

</div>

Why is this so great? I hear it mostly from conservatives, and I’m not sure why level is so great. I have to admit that since I don’t care for sports, all sports analogies leave me cold.  
But I know enough about sports that I think every one is independent of the levelness of the playing field. Presumably all playing fields were uneven back in the day, and so every sport has made that irrelevant. They change sides or flip coins or have toss ups to make everything even. Or else like golf, all players are facing the same unlevel ground anyway.  
What am I missing here?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Khampelf](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/8e7dd6/32.png) [@Khampelf](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Khampelf)\
**Post date:** [September 22, 2007, 10:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-phrase-just-want-a-level-playing-field/420137/2 "2007-09-22T22:00:42Z")

</div>

Well, on the face of it, if the field is unlevel, one side is playing/fighting uphill. Being on higher ground is emblematic for having an advantage.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![x-ray\_vision](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/x-ray_vision/32/351_2.png) [@x-ray\_vision](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/x-ray_vision)\
**Post date:** [September 22, 2007, 10:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-phrase-just-want-a-level-playing-field/420137/3 "2007-09-22T22:01:07Z")

</div>

Imagine a game of football played on a hill. The team whose goal line is at the top would surely be at a disadvantage.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Exapno\_Mapcase](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/exapno_mapcase/32/1051_2.png) [@Exapno\_Mapcase](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Exapno_Mapcase)\
**Post date:** [September 22, 2007, 10:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-phrase-just-want-a-level-playing-field/420137/4 "2007-09-22T22:05:58Z")

</div>

It was apparently coined for the magazine American Banker, January 1979:

> [@](#):
>
> “[He] said the Oregon BA welcomed ‘any and all competition, on a level playing field’.”

[http://www.word-detective.com/030698.html](http://www.word-detective.com/030698.html)

> [@](#):
>
> Of course there’s no such thing as an absolutely perfectly level playing field. And of course, on the other hand, most playing fields are more or less level, and no one plays soccer or baseball on the side of a hill, for gosh sakes.
> 
> But “level playing field” isn’t supposed to be taken literally. It’s a phrase invented by business theorists in the late 1970’s who needed a graphic metaphor for equality in the marketplace. Play along for a minute, OK? Just try to imagine how horribly unfair it would be if there really were such things as un-level playing fields, and your team were looking uphill at the Dallas Cowboys. Now try to imagine that the free market were actually allowed to run free and certain industries didn’t get favorable regulations and government subsidies. Same thing, right? See what I mean?
> 
> Reality has nothing to do with it.

Well, reality has a little bit to do with it:

> **[Non-Level playing field - phrase meaning and origin](https://www.phrases.org.uk/bulletin_board/44/messages/807.html)**
>
> Non-Level playing field - the meaning and origin of this phrase

> [@](#):
>
> Some football grounds (‘soccer’ to you ex-colonials) have pitches that slope - the most famous in the English lower-leagues were Barnet and Yeovil. the problem is that when players are tired, running uphill puts them at a disadvantage, so whoever gets to choose ends, gets to play kicking downhill 2nd half.

But mostly The Word Detective is right. It’s an obvious metaphor for giving everybody an equal chance, not having unfair rules and regulations that favor one side, being “on the level” so to speak.

But I’ve found here at the Dope that the number of people who simply don’t “get” metaphors is much larger than most metaphor-lovers suspect.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Billdo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/billdo/32/315_2.png) [@Billdo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Billdo)\
**Post date:** [September 23, 2007, 11:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-phrase-just-want-a-level-playing-field/420137/5 "2007-09-23T11:45:33Z")

</div>

Another aspect to consider in its use, particularly in political discussions, is that it is often used in connection with affirmative action and other programs designed to benefit disadvantaged groups.

Where there are programs which give particular advantages to individuals who, because of race, gender or other factors which have historically hindered similar individuals there arises a question of whether giving such advantages is “fair”, particularly to those who do not get such advantages. For instance, under some affirmative action-type programs blacks will be hired or promoted where they received lower test or other scores than similarly situated whites. It is a matter of significant political debate (suitable for the Great Debates forum, not here) whether these types of programs are appropriate.

However, the “level playing field” metaphor is used, on the one hand, to suggest that those receiving such benefits are getting an inappropriate “leg up” to unfairly compete. On the other hand, the metaphor can be reversed to suggest that those not facing the burdens of discrimination come into the game with an unfair “leg up”.

The metaphor may be similarly applied to corporations or industries which receive government subsidies or other benefits by competitors which do not receive the same.

By the way, **Prêt-à-Poster** , I love the screen name.
