# The Pope wants you dead

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-pope-wants-you-dead/206459>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [October 9, 2003, 11:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-pope-wants-you-dead/206459 "2003-10-09T11:41:31Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Matchka](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/77aa72/32.png) [@Matchka](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Matchka)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2003, 12:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-pope-wants-you-dead/206459/81 "2003-10-10T00:23:44Z")

</div>

Or, SHIT! You mean the PRIESTS are getting it at a high rate? Well now it all makes sense.

The priests are all getting AIDS (because they’re only human…) and they swear up and down they’ve been using condoms.  
Therefore Da Vatican deduces that condoms are ineffective at stopping the virus. OK. I get it now. Think I’ll go hijack a Pit rant…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e99b99/32.png) [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Diogenes_the_Cynic)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2003, 1:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-pope-wants-you-dead/206459/82 "2003-10-10T01:00:00Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Matchka \*  
> \*\*“If you’re completely monogamous, and remained virginal until marriage (along with your spouse) you’re in really good shape AIDS wise.”
> 
> **Otto**"There are those who are barred by law and doctrine from marrying. One of those groups is among the hardest hit by the AIDS epidemic. Coincidence?
> 
> Hmmm? The only AIDS group I can think of that are barred \* by law and doctrine \* from marrying are homosexuals. Are you suggesting that homos have a more difficult time remaining virginal and monogamous until they find their one true love?
> 
> I don’t think that’s what you meant, cuz if it is then you are sugesting that homos are philandering sex fiends incapable of respecting the high moral decency required of marriage.
> 
> So, please, elaborate? \*\*

Being virginal or monogomous guarantee nothing to begin with but another point here is that from a simply moralistic standpoint, the RCC draws no distinction between monogomous homosexual relationships or promiscuous behaviors. Even if gay people do live in committed, promiscuous relationships they are still condemed as immoral by Church doctrine. That’s a separate issue from whether they would be more protected from AIDS but I persoanlly find it distasteful to suggest that AIDS has any moral implications for the person who contracts it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e99b99/32.png) [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Diogenes_the_Cynic)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2003, 1:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-pope-wants-you-dead/206459/83 "2003-10-10T01:02:40Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Matchka \*  
> \*\*Or, SHIT! You mean the PRIESTS are getting it at a high rate? Well now it all makes sense.
> 
> The priests are all getting AIDS (because they’re only human…) and they swear up and down they’ve been using condoms.  
> Therefore Da Vatican deduces that condoms are ineffective at stopping the virus. OK. I get it now. Think I’ll go hijack a Pit rant… \*\*

What the hell are you responding to here? I’m trying to find some context for this post but I don’t know what you’re talking about.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JRDelirious](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jrdelirious/32/9531_2.png) [@JRDelirious](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JRDelirious)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2003, 2:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-pope-wants-you-dead/206459/84 "2003-10-10T02:14:40Z")

</div>

The Fuller/Keenan article from 3 years back linked to by **tomndebb** above, points to there being a lack of unanimity about this angle on the condom issue within the hierarchy. Still, in JP2’s last days the hardline reactionaries seem to be going full-tilt-gonzo for every chance to reassert themselves. That’s probably because they correctly figure that if they can make their pet project look like part of JP2’s “legacy” it stands a better chance of surviving future changes in Church political climate.

> [@](#):
>
> And now the RCC is basically telling them they should abstain, for life, from one of the most basic forms of human contact, or risk infecting their partners?

Pretty much so. The traditional position is that every urge of the flesh can be mastered. Remember, theoretically speaking, under RCC doctrine you may not even _masturbate_; as mentioned, real-world pastoral care tends to be more flexible than abstract theological positions (And hey, in the most reductionist sense, they do have a point: remaining celibate is not gonna kill you. Sex is a life-or-death need for the species but not for the individual)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cheesesteak](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cheesesteak/32/3694_2.png) [@Cheesesteak](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cheesesteak)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2003, 2:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-pope-wants-you-dead/206459/85 "2003-10-10T02:41:58Z")

</div>

Diogenes, I think he’s referring to the fact that priests aren’t allowed to marry. You know, the old switcheroo.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Matchka](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/77aa72/32.png) [@Matchka](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Matchka)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2003, 5:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-pope-wants-you-dead/206459/86 "2003-10-10T05:58:00Z")

</div>

Nice catch, \*\* Cheese \*\*, I forgot to put in the part about the priests not having received sufficient/correct condom-use instruction–them dang things is tricky!

\*\* Diogenes \*\* in my post preceding the facetious one I was sincerely responding to Otto’s response to an earlier post essentially stating that AIDS is pretty easy to NOT get if you exercise some educated restraint sexually. A point with which I agree.

I’m not such a dimwit as to associate spiritual morality with physical disease, and it appeared from Ottos post that those barred from marriage were more prone to AIDS:

\*\*There are those who are barred by law and doctrine from marrying. One of those groups \*\* homosexuals (and priests)  
\*\* is among the hardest hit by the AIDS epidemic. \*\* get more AIDS  
**Coincidence?**

This seems to assert that those who are not married are more succeptible. This can only be because (a) God Almighty is punishing their wanton behavior or (b) those who are not married can not conduct themselves in a manner which is \*\*completely monogamous, and … virginal until marriage \*\* irrespective of whether or not the marriage is socially or religiously sanctioned.

Cuz if you don’t fuck someone with AIDS (and ALWAYS use your OWN needle and don’t lend it out) you ain’t gonna get the disease…unless you’re one of the few with astronomically bad luck who get it from receiving tainted blood products.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Enderw24](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/ba9def/32.png) [@Enderw24](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Enderw24)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2003, 6:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-pope-wants-you-dead/206459/87 "2003-10-10T06:32:23Z")

</div>

To the people that are telling Brutus to fuck off, would you actually LOOK at what it is he’s trying to say. Stop reacting. Look.

I, for one, happen to think the Church is extremely consistent in its belief system regarding sexual relations. I also think that if every single person on the planet followed those belief systems, we would have not only have no AIDS epidemic, we wouldn’t have AIDS period.

“But what about the cheating spouse you douche bag?”  
The church prohibits adultary.

“But what about the IV drug user you twatwistle?”  
The church prohibits drug use.

“But what about the guy who rapes your wife you smegma sucker?”  
The church prohibits raping another person.

“But what about the gay relationship you fucking homophobe?”  
The church prohibits gay relationships.

“But what about the mom who gives birth to an HIV infected child you craniumanus?”  
If everyone followed the church’s rules, that would never happen.

“But what about the doctor who gave it to his patient you hamster squicker?”  
Do you think he’s a mad scientist? That he invented AIDS in his backroom? No, he got it from someone else who didn’t follow the church’s rules.

If every single person lived the life the Church set down for us: one person only as your partner, HIV and AIDS would never ever have happened. Those who deny this, those who call other people names for pointing out this blatantly obvious fact, are the true morons in this thread.

That said, let me be clear: I don’t agree with a good deal of what the church has laid down on this topic. Given that HIV is out there, given that homosexuals wish to have relationships, given that marriage before sex can be, well…pretty damn good, the church’s stance is hopelessly outdated and indeed harmful in most instances.  
But it is internally consistent. That’s the point. If everyone from the very start were to have followed those rules, we’d not be discussing this today.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jodi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/7feea3/32.png) [@Jodi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jodi)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2003, 7:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-pope-wants-you-dead/206459/88 "2003-10-10T07:19:31Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> If everyone from the very start were to have followed those rules, we’d not be discussing this today.

Sure, ENDER, but as I’ve already said, so what? We are discussing it today because people _don’t_ follow those rules, because the whole damn world isn’t Catholic, much less Catholic and perfect.

So pointing out that we wouldn’t be in this mess if everyone just kept their naughty bits in their pants is pointless. They don’t, they never have, and if the Catholic church is _lying_ to people about the transmission of AIDS, they are criminally irresponsible down here in the real world.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2003, 7:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-pope-wants-you-dead/206459/89 "2003-10-10T07:23:36Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> But it is internally consistent. That’s the point. If everyone from the very start were to have followed those rules, we’d not be discussing this today.

Seems to me that by acknowledging people DO use cheat and use condoms, the Church is (momentarily) stepping into the real world. But then it attempts to step out of it again and say that they shouldn’t use them because they don’t work (incidentally, I thought the RCC officially frowned on lying as well).

Let me draw an analogy for a moment: the best way to avoid dying in a skydiving accident is to never go skydiving in the first place. But if you do it, the best way to survive is to use a parachute. If I say that you shouldn’t skydive and that even if you do, you should never use a parachute because they’re sinful, even if I’m being internally consistent, it’s more noteworthy and germane that I’m being a **gigantic raving moron**.

If you ask me, which for a zillion reasons no church ever would, the most moral thing to do in any situation is to respond logically and sensibly to the facts at hand. If the Church was just playing the “I told you so” game (advocating abstinence), that’d be one thing. It wouldn’t be particularly helpful because it doesn’t deal with the real world, but still. Instead, they’re not only avoiding the real world truth that people are often non-monogamous, they’re giving bad advice (don’t use condoms) and false justifications (they never work).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2003, 7:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-pope-wants-you-dead/206459/90 "2003-10-10T07:26:15Z")

</div>

Incidentally, I don’t buy this bit about “if people were monogamous there’d be no AIDS.” The current theory is that the disease lept from monkeys to humans when people ate the flesh of infected monkeys, right? The people who ate those monkeys and gained the virus could’ve had monogamous sex with their life partners and given them the disease, and then they would’ve had kids who with AIDS, who would then likely have sex and pass on the virus to their monogamous lifepartners and their children, etc. Not that it would necessarily be the problem it is today, but even if the Church has a point, they don’t have THAT MUCH of a point…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cheesesteak](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cheesesteak/32/3694_2.png) [@Cheesesteak](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cheesesteak)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2003, 12:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-pope-wants-you-dead/206459/91 "2003-10-10T12:05:18Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Marley23 \*  
> **If I say that you shouldn’t skydive and that even if you do, you should never use a parachute because they’re sinful, even if I’m being internally consistent, it’s more noteworthy and germane that I’m being a gigantic raving moron.**

I’d be a bit more inclined to say the person who listens to the no parachute part while ignoring the no skydiving part is the raving moron. Of course what seems obvious to me might not be so obvious to less educated people across the world.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Desmostylus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/c57346/32.png) [@Desmostylus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Desmostylus)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2003, 12:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-pope-wants-you-dead/206459/92 "2003-10-10T12:25:42Z")

</div>

**Marley23** and **Cheesesteak** both got the analogy a bit wrong. This’d be a bit closer:

If I say that you shouldn’t skydive **because it’s sinful** and that even if you do, you should never use a parachute **because parachutes aren’t 100% effective** , even if I’m being **entirely illogical** , it’s more noteworthy and germane that I’m being a gigantic raving moron

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Desmostylus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/c57346/32.png) [@Desmostylus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Desmostylus)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2003, 12:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-pope-wants-you-dead/206459/93 "2003-10-10T12:31:13Z")

</div>

Note: I’m not trying to say that either **Marley23** or **Cheesesteak** are gigantic raving morons. The _Bishop_ is a gigantic raving moron.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2003, 12:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-pope-wants-you-dead/206459/94 "2003-10-10T12:38:51Z")

</div>

Well, **Desmo** , I did include the bit about skydiving also being wrong, and I think I noted that parachutes were ‘bad’ and not just ineffective, but I think we covered everything between the two of us. ‘Internal consistency’ is less than important when you’re being ass-backwards and stupid on a given topic.

**Cheesesteak** , I think the education part is very important. A fully informed person who chooses not to use a condom when he should is an idiot. On the other hand, people who don’t have all the facts because a source they trust (for reasons that are a _total mystery_ to me) is lying to them are in a different situation.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Enderw24](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/ba9def/32.png) [@Enderw24](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Enderw24)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2003, 12:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-pope-wants-you-dead/206459/95 "2003-10-10T12:48:27Z")

</div>

**Jodi** , I do not disagree with you. The world is not Catholic and perfect. Heck, I don’t even believe being Catholic _is_ being perfect, but that’s really another thread.  
But while one may disagree with the teachings of the Catholic church, one can still agree that following its teachings to the letter would have stopped this epidemic before it started. Just making that statement shouldn’t be reason for an absolute pileon by the person who said it. That’s my point. You may disagree with message but would it be too much to ask that you guys stop killing the messenger (i.e. Brutus)?

**Marley23** , I have not heard this theory before. Do you have any information on it?  
Besides, if the monkeys had just followed the church teachings and been in monogomous relationships…  
🙂

Also, your analogy is flawed. If you equate skydiving with premarital sex, the church is not saying “even if you do skydive, we say don’t use a parachute.” The church is saying “don’t skydive at all. Ever.” If you are Catholic and choose to break that rule, it’s you who is being internally inconsistent.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2003, 1:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-pope-wants-you-dead/206459/96 "2003-10-10T13:24:04Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Diogenes the Cynic \*  
> \*\*Quibble over bullshit semantics very much. I was obviouslt talking about the ways in which the virus is _transmitted_. **Brutus** proffered a characteristically charmless and ignorant suggestion that if it wasn’t for non-monogomous sex there would be no AIDS. Do you agree with that assertion? \*\*

Bullshit yourself.

**Brutus** made an completely accurate statement that AIDS is primarily a sexually transmitted disease. The bullshit came from you.

Are you going to claim that if someone has stated that “gay sex causes AIDS”, you or someone like you wouldn’t have jumped down his throat? Feel free to try - I need a laugh, and the idea of you claiming that someone else is “characteristically charmless and ignorant” wasn’t enough.

I agree with this assertion, if you care.

“If it weren’t for non-monogamous sex (and, to some extent, IV drug abuse), the incidence of AIDS would be enormously reduced, particularly in America but also throughout the rest of the world.” Do you agree with that assertion? Because every word of it is true.

If it weren’t for the fact that the average number of sex partners for the first patients diagnosed with AIDS in America was in the hundreds, the HIV virus would not have spread like wildfire thru the gay community. Tainted blood products for hemophiliacs did not become a problem until after that occurred.

Are you claiming that AIDS in Africa is spread by people in mutually monogamous relationships? Please don’t talk nonsense.

Hemophiliacs get the disease from tainted blood. The blood is tainted (primarily) by people engaging in non-monogamous sex or IV drug abuse.

Children get it from their mothers. Their mothers get it from tainted blood (see above), IV drug abuse, or non-monogamous sex with bisexual men or IV drug abusers.

Prostitutes get it from IV drug abuse or non-monogamous sex.

Men get it from non-monogamous sex with prostitutes.

These strained scenarios where some completely innocent person gets it from some other completely innocent person, who got it in some completely innocent way, happen, but they happen _very, very rarely_. In nearly every instance, the virus was transmitted by some act that the Church specifically condemns as sinful, at most at one or two removes.

You are arguing that there is some method of transmission besides sex or needles? What would that be, casual contact?

Are we back to the misconceptions of the early 80s again?

Regards,  
Shodan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Desmostylus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/c57346/32.png) [@Desmostylus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Desmostylus)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2003, 1:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-pope-wants-you-dead/206459/97 "2003-10-10T13:34:05Z")

</div>

Bad people get sick. Everyone knows that.

**Shodan** is a fuckwit. Everyone know that, too.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![stpauler](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9d8465/32.png) [@stpauler](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/stpauler)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2003, 1:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-pope-wants-you-dead/206459/98 "2003-10-10T13:37:36Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Shodan \*  
> \*\*Bullshit yourself.
> 
> **Brutus** made an completely accurate statement that AIDS is primarily a sexually transmitted disease. The bullshit came from you.
> 
> \*\*

Bullshit you. Show me where **Brutus** said AIDS is _primarily_ a sexually transmitted disease. He said that AIDS is a sexually transmitted disease.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Captain\_Amazing](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/6de8d8/32.png) [@Captain\_Amazing](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Captain_Amazing)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2003, 1:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-pope-wants-you-dead/206459/99 "2003-10-10T13:42:55Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by stpauler \*  
> \*\*Yes, that’s true. but AIDS is not a _Sexually Transmitted Disease_ as he said above. \*\*

Yes it is, because the primary method of transmission is through sexual contact with an infected person. It’s true that it also can be transmitted through infected blood products, but that doesn’t make it any less an STD.

Syphilis can also be transmitted through infected blood, but it’s considered a sexually transmitted disease.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![stpauler](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9d8465/32.png) [@stpauler](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/stpauler)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2003, 1:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-pope-wants-you-dead/206459/100 "2003-10-10T13:46:22Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Captain Amazing \*  
> \*\*Yes it is, because the primary method of transmission is through sexual contact with an infected person. It’s true that it also can be transmitted through infected blood products, but that doesn’t make it any less an STD.
> 
> Syphilis can also be transmitted through infected blood, but it’s considered a sexually transmitted disease. \*\*

I still disagree. It can be a sexually transmitted disease but to call it an STD is syllogistic logic and a misnomer as it can be contracted elsewise.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-pope-wants-you-dead/206459.md?page=4)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-pope-wants-you-dead/206459.md?page=6)
