John Adams is the second Founding Father to be ejected from the contest, mainly for the passage of the Alien and Sedition Acts.
George Washington (None, 1789-1797)
Thomas Jefferson (Democratic-Republican, 1801-1809)
James Monroe (Democratic-Republican, 1817-1825)
John Quincy Adams (Democratic-Republican, 1825-1829)
James Polk (Democrat, 1845-1849)
Zachary Taylor (Whig, 1849-1850)
Abraham Lincoln (Republican, 1861-1865)
Chester Arthur (Republican, 1881-1885)
Grover Cleveland (Democrat, 1885-1889, 1893-1897)
Benjamin Harrison (Republican, 1889-1893)
William McKinley (Republican, 1897-1901)
Theodore Roosevelt (Republican, 1901-1909)
William Howard Taft (Republican, 1909-1913)
Franklin Delano Roosevelt (Democrat, 1933-1945)
Henry Truman (Democrat, 1945-1953)
Dwight Eisenhower (Republican, 1953-1961)
John Fitzgerald Kennedy (Democrat, 1961-1963)
Lyndon Baines Johnson (Democrat, 1963-1969)
Gerald Ford (Republican, 1974-1977)
George Herbert Walker Bush (Republican, 1989-1993)
William Jefferson Clinton (Democrat, 1993-2001)
I’m tempted to vote for McKinley for joining the imperialist dogpile and going to war with Spain, but I’ll take Benjamin Harrison–mostly because Neill Ferguson has me wondering if joining the imperialist dogpile is really such a bad thing.
And why a “LibDem” is selecting the #1 free-soiler before Lincoln is beyond me. Zachary Taylor is our most underrated President. If he’d lived, there would have been no Civil War–or at the very least, it would have been a much smaller affair, not the great scar on our collective history that the war itself and the succeeding Reconstruction have proven to be.
I think stu’s already madehis casefor Taylor. Though I wouldn’t be unhappy to hear more. I think it is telling that, out of the 1830s, 40s, and 50s, he and Polk’s collective 5 years are the only ones remaining.
I don’t think it is quite Taylor’s time yet. I do believe there are remaining presidents that have done less net good in 48 months than Taylor did in 16.
I really wish the voting would pick up, as the small sample sizes (could, in theory if not reality) lead to a small subset of the voting contingent to get it in their heads that candidate X has to go. In other words more voters = more of a diversity of opinion and a more meaningful outcome. Just saying.
I agree with this. I didn’t notice the game until late but this kind of thing is right up my alley. Maybe we should take out some billboard space on I-95?
The momentum seems to be with Harrison and that’s fine with me. It has to be pretty bad if you get beaten after a single term by the guy you replaced to begin with.
Would everyone mind summing up the reasons for picking Harrison, Taylor, Arthur, etc? It probably won’t matter with the momentum behind Harrison, but I still want to hear about their missteps as president, I being ignorant about presidents and all that.