# The price of Beatles CDs...

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-price-of-beatles-cds/277159>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [November 29, 2004, 4:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-price-of-beatles-cds/277159 "2004-11-29T16:08:45Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JohnBckWLD](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/d6d6ee/32.png) [@JohnBckWLD](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JohnBckWLD)\
**Post date:** [December 1, 2004, 12:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-price-of-beatles-cds/277159/21 "2004-12-01T00:57:23Z")

</div>

Perhaps I’m the only one believes the following premise: CD’s are a bargain when they’re compared side-by-side with the price of other (non-carnal) entertainment media.

Sports Tickets (The parking alone costs more than a CD)  
Books (Cost more and can be enjoyed once, perhaps 2x)  
Movie Tickets ($10US for +/- 90 minutes)  
DVD’s (See books)  
Museum Admission (read donation)  
etc, etc, etc

but it’s all relative and YMMV

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Thudlow\_Boink](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thudlow_boink/32/320_2.png) [@Thudlow\_Boink](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Thudlow_Boink)\
**Post date:** [December 1, 2004, 1:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-price-of-beatles-cds/277159/22 "2004-12-01T01:09:16Z")

</div>

> [@Small Clanger](#):
>
> As to the OP. It’s no surprise theycan still charge £16.99 for Rubber Soul/Revolver/Sgt Pepper/Abbey Road but _Beatles for Sale_? WTF?

For comparison purposes, for the sake of us Americans, how much is that in real money—I mean, in U.S. dollars? 🙂

I notice [amazon.co.uk](http://amazon.co.uk) has Beatles albums for £9.99 each. On the U.S. [amazon.com](http://amazon.com), the “list price” is $18.98 each, but Amazon’s selling them for $13.49 for the later ones or $13.99 for the earlier ones. 😕 (Or $27.99 for the White Album.) For what it’s worth, the average Beatles disc costs less than the average Britney Spears disc.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Blue\_Sky](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/d26b3c/32.png) [@Mr.Blue\_Sky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Blue_Sky)\
**Post date:** [December 1, 2004, 1:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-price-of-beatles-cds/277159/23 "2004-12-01T01:17:11Z")

</div>

> [@Thudlow Boink](#):
>
> For comparison purposes, for the sake of us Americans, how much is that in real money—I mean, in U.S. dollars? 🙂

According to [XE](http://www.xe.com/ucc), it’s about $32.48! :eek:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GorillaMan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/50afbb/32.png) [@GorillaMan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GorillaMan)\
**Post date:** [December 1, 2004, 1:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-price-of-beatles-cds/277159/24 "2004-12-01T01:17:31Z")

</div>

> [@JohnBckWLD](#):
>
> Books (Cost more and can be enjoyed once, perhaps 2x)

You’re buying the wrong books.

> [@](#):
>
> Movie Tickets ($10US for +/- 90 minutes)

You’re going to the wrong cinemas, and seeing the wrong films.

> [@](#):
>
> Museum Admission (read donation)

Eh? Either it’s an admission, or a donation. One is likely to be less than a CD single, the other as much or as little as you see fit.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tremorviolet](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/e47774/32.png) [@tremorviolet](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tremorviolet)\
**Post date:** [December 1, 2004, 1:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-price-of-beatles-cds/277159/25 "2004-12-01T01:21:01Z")

</div>

The price of CDs in general pisses me off. I worked at a record store right when CDs were first coming out. At the time, records and cassettes usually had a list price of $9.99 and would go on sale for $6.88 or $7.88. CDs were priced at $15.99 and the music companies kept promising that they’d get cheaper once they were in mass production. Guess what? They _never_ got cheaper. In fact, the average list price (the price the record company sets, not the sale price) is $17.99 for a new release. I truly believe record companies are shooting themselves in the head for more profit. If CD’s were around $10, they’d see a _lot_ more sales and less temptation to obtain the music via other means.

And, yeah, the price of the Beatles CDs has always been ridiculously high. Most albums that old are part of a record companies midline series - CDs usually priced at $12.99 that are often featured in sales. I don’t know what the rational is behind keeping the prices so high (other than maybe some stiff royalty agreements) but they’re definitely losing sales…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sam\_Stone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecccb3/32.png) [@Sam\_Stone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sam_Stone)\
**Post date:** [December 1, 2004, 1:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-price-of-beatles-cds/277159/26 "2004-12-01T01:25:11Z")

</div>

Actually, I was going to rant about those prices myself (the Beatles CD’s here in Canada are usually around $30 - maybe $25 at best, while other ‘back catalog’ stuff is usually $10-$15), but JohnBckWLD has a very good point - compared to other entertainment, CD’s (and DVD’s for that matter) are very inexpensive.

Take books. I no longer read hardcover books. I make a good salary, and I can’t afford them. Mainstream hardcover non-fiction books in Canada can easily run $35-$50. I used to buy 3-5 books a month, but I had to stop years ago, because it was just too expensive. $200 per month for books? I can not afford $50 for a book to read over a weekend. Even paperback novels here in Canada now run from $10 to $15.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jabiru](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/bbce88/32.png) [@jabiru](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jabiru)\
**Post date:** [December 1, 2004, 1:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-price-of-beatles-cds/277159/27 "2004-12-01T01:43:57Z")

</div>

It’s not just Beatles’ CDs either. I paid $AU30 for a Jimi Hendrix CD for the husband a few years ago. Great CD but a ripoff price.

And, speaking of books, what’s the deal with Trade Paperbacks? They’re at least $AU10 more than paperbacks. I used to buy a huge number of books but I won’t buy hardcover or TPs anymore. A person still has to eat.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JohnBckWLD](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/d6d6ee/32.png) [@JohnBckWLD](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JohnBckWLD)\
**Post date:** [December 1, 2004, 1:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-price-of-beatles-cds/277159/28 "2004-12-01T01:54:20Z")

</div>

> [@GorillaMan](#):
>
> You’re buying the wrong books.

Perhaps, but have you really ever read the same book 3x or more? I couldn’t even count the # of times I’ve listened to my 100 fave albums.

> [@GorillaMan](#):
>
> You’re going to the wrong cinemas, and seeing the wrong films

I concur, but with 2 daughters and winter weather, the occasional romp to see SpongeBob is unavoidable.

> [@Gorilla Man](#):
>
> Eh? Either it’s an admission, or a donation. One is likely to be less than a CD single, the other as much or as little as you see fit.

They only time I ever paid [the $20 they are charging @ MoMA](http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0448/snow.php) was for a rare OOP 45.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cervaise](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cervaise/32/16693_2.png) [@Cervaise](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cervaise)\
**Post date:** [December 1, 2004, 1:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-price-of-beatles-cds/277159/29 "2004-12-01T01:56:53Z")

</div>

> [@Sam Stone](#):
>
> $200 per month for books?

If I’m really, really disciplined, I can very occasionally get down to that, sometimes two months in a row. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tremorviolet](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/e47774/32.png) [@tremorviolet](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tremorviolet)\
**Post date:** [December 1, 2004, 2:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-price-of-beatles-cds/277159/30 "2004-12-01T02:20:38Z")

</div>

> [@Cervaise](#):
>
> > [@SamStone](#):
> >
> > $200 per month for books?
> 
> If I’m really, really disciplined, I can very occasionally get down to that, sometimes two months in a row. 😉

Yeah, $200 is my baseline budget for books. I exceed that maybe half the time. (but, in my defense, a lot of my books are imported from Japan and shipping fees are included)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ms2001](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ms2001/32/18463_2.png) [@Ms2001](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ms2001)\
**Post date:** [December 1, 2004, 2:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-price-of-beatles-cds/277159/31 "2004-12-01T02:21:24Z")

</div>

Come on, folks! Won’t someone **please** think of the artists? If not for the prospect of huge sacks of money from selling overpriced CDs, what possible incentive would The Beatles have to record any more albums?

Oh, wait…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![todd33rpm](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/a5b964/32.png) [@todd33rpm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/todd33rpm)\
**Post date:** [December 1, 2004, 2:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-price-of-beatles-cds/277159/32 "2004-12-01T02:54:53Z")

</div>

> [@+MDI](#):
>
> Yep, the rants based on Fopp prices. The cheapest Beatles CD is Rubber Soul at £10.

Without thinking I’d have to explicitly state it, the thrust of my point was that if it was me having to mull over paying huge money on the discs, I’d like to see them be at least as state-of-the-art as they could be.

However, it’s _your_ hermetically sealed, not-to-be-touched-with-other-input-because-oh-God-now-you’ve-gone-and-sullied-it-with-your-fingerprints-let-go-before-you-break-it-already, way-too-brief-as-it-is OP, dude. Whatever. I’ll play along:

“Boy, no kidding. Those wacky Beatles!” Or, “those wacky multinational record conglomerates and their shiny silver discs!”

I hope that was of more help. _appropriate smiley implied here_

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pepperlandgirl](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/f17d59/32.png) [@pepperlandgirl](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pepperlandgirl)\
**Post date:** [December 1, 2004, 5:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-price-of-beatles-cds/277159/33 "2004-12-01T05:59:24Z")

</div>

> [@Guinastasia](#):
>
> Eh, not all of them. Some of the more obscure tracks, B-sides and aren’t always played.
> 
> When was the last time you heard _Glass Onion_ or _Doctor Robert_ on the radio?

When I was young and poor (being 14 and without a job) I wanted to collect all the songs.

So I listened to Breakfast with the Beatles every Sunday for several months, and I got all the obscure songs. It just takes a little perserverence.

Of course, as soon as I got money, I invested it all in the albums, the movies, books…What’s weird is, I never remember paying more than $14/CD and usually less (around $10).

Good ol’ K-Mart…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![paulberserker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/c4cdca/32.png) [@paulberserker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/paulberserker)\
**Post date:** [December 1, 2004, 11:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-price-of-beatles-cds/277159/34 "2004-12-01T11:01:09Z")

</div>

Found you a good place [to buy everything you need](http://www.play.com/play247.asp?page=title&r=CD&title=529269&p=34&g=48). Also on that little known website, [Play.com](http://Play.com), nigh on all their albums are £9.99. On that other obscure website, CDwow, they’re £8.99, both with free P&P. How much do you want to fucking pay? Saves you bus fare into town as well.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dead\_Badger](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/848f3c/32.png) [@Dead\_Badger](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dead_Badger)\
**Post date:** [December 1, 2004, 12:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-price-of-beatles-cds/277159/35 "2004-12-01T12:06:21Z")

</div>

> [@tremorviolet](#):
>
> The price of CDs in general pisses me off. I worked at a record store right when CDs were first coming out. At the time, records and cassettes usually had a list price of $9.99 and would go on sale for $6.88 or $7.88. CDs were priced at $15.99 and the music companies kept promising that they’d get cheaper once they were in mass production. Guess what? They _never_ got cheaper. In fact, the average list price (the price the record company sets, not the sale price) is $17.99 for a new release.

Well, CDs did come out in the mid-80s; 20 years of inflation means that in real terms, $17.99 _is_ substantially cheaper than they were initially. $16 in 1985 would be the equivalent of about $27 now (well, in 2003), and in reverse, the list price of $18 now is just above $10 in 1985 money. So it works out about right.

([Nifty site](http://www.westegg.com/inflation/) wot I just discovered…)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GorillaMan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/50afbb/32.png) [@GorillaMan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GorillaMan)\
**Post date:** [December 1, 2004, 12:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-price-of-beatles-cds/277159/36 "2004-12-01T12:07:19Z")

</div>

> [@JohnBckWLD](#):
>
> Perhaps, but have you really ever read the same book 3x or more?

Yep.

> [@](#):
>
> I worked at a record store right when CDs were first coming out. At the time, …CDs were priced at $15.99 and the music companies kept promising that they’d get cheaper once they were in mass production. Guess what? They never got cheaper. In fact, the average list price (the price the record company sets, not the sale price) is $17.99 for a new release.

$18 in 2003 equates to $10 in 1984. So in real terms, they’ve kept their promise. [http://www1.jsc.nasa.gov/bu2/inflateCPI.html](http://www1.jsc.nasa.gov/bu2/inflateCPI.html)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ms2001](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ms2001/32/18463_2.png) [@Ms2001](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ms2001)\
**Post date:** [December 1, 2004, 12:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-price-of-beatles-cds/277159/37 "2004-12-01T12:22:43Z")

</div>

Kept their promise? Barely. The price of CDs is still 2/3 of what it was 20 years ago. It’d be enlightening to know how much of a CD’s price in 1984 was manufacturing costs vs. how much of it is today.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dead\_Badger](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/848f3c/32.png) [@Dead\_Badger](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dead_Badger)\
**Post date:** [December 1, 2004, 12:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-price-of-beatles-cds/277159/38 "2004-12-01T12:32:34Z")

</div>

> [@Mr2001](#):
>
> Kept their promise? Barely. The price of CDs is still 2/3 of what it was 20 years ago. It’d be enlightening to know how much of a CD’s price in 1984 was manufacturing costs vs. how much of it is today.

Or, as proven, the cost of music in real terms is identical to what it was in 1985. Do you think music has become less valuable in that time? Why the obsession with what the physical media costs? Is that really what you’re paying for?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Capt.Ridley\_s\_Shooting\_Party](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/cc9497/32.png) [@Capt.Ridley\_s\_Shooting\_Party](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Capt.Ridley_s_Shooting_Party)\
**Post date:** [December 1, 2004, 5:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-price-of-beatles-cds/277159/39 "2004-12-01T17:12:45Z")

</div>

> [@todd33rpm](#):
>
> Without thinking I’d have to explicitly state it, the thrust of my point was that if it was me having to mull over paying huge money on the discs, I’d like to see them be at least as state-of-the-art as they could be.
> 
> However, it’s _your_ hermetically sealed, not-to-be-touched-with-other-input-because-oh-God-now-you’ve-gone-and-sullied-it-with-your-fingerprints-let-go-before-you-break-it-already, way-too-brief-as-it-is OP, dude. Whatever. I’ll play along:
> 
> “Boy, no kidding. Those wacky Beatles!” Or, “those wacky multinational record conglomerates and their shiny silver discs!”
> 
> I hope that was of more help. _appropriate smiley implied here_

I quoted the wrong person. Fuck knows what your post actually means, though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lieu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/c2a13f/32.png) [@lieu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lieu)\
**Post date:** [December 1, 2004, 5:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-price-of-beatles-cds/277159/40 "2004-12-01T17:49:21Z")

</div>

As half owner of the Beatles’ song royalties along with Sony/ATV, could it be that Jacko’s considerable legal expenditures have necessitated the continued high CD price?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-price-of-beatles-cds/277159.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-price-of-beatles-cds/277159.md?page=3)
