# The Repeal of Obamacare/ACA: Step-bystep, Inch-by-inch

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-repeal-of-obamacare-aca-step-bystep-inch-by-inch/776146>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [January 2, 2017, 5:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-repeal-of-obamacare-aca-step-bystep-inch-by-inch/776146 "2017-01-02T17:06:13Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 33

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2017, 7:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-repeal-of-obamacare-aca-step-bystep-inch-by-inch/776146/641 "2017-05-04T19:25:52Z")

</div>

That Issa and a few others that were wavering in support ended up voting yes makes me think that the final count really was that close. I’m pretty sure those guys would have voted no if they had any margin at all.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wonky](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wonky/32/393_2.png) [@wonky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wonky)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2017, 7:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-repeal-of-obamacare-aca-step-bystep-inch-by-inch/776146/642 "2017-05-04T19:32:00Z")

</div>

> [@PastTense](#):
>
> No. If it wasn’t that close they would have passed the version a few weeks ago–and they wouldn’t have been making last minute deals to add a very small number of votes.

They made some big changes to bring on the Freedom Caucus. Then they made tiny changes to give fig leaves to the moderates.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wonky](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wonky/32/393_2.png) [@wonky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wonky)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2017, 7:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-repeal-of-obamacare-aca-step-bystep-inch-by-inch/776146/643 "2017-05-04T19:33:37Z")

</div>

> [@Elendil\_s\_Heir](#):
>
> Eyccch. How many people will lose coverage if the Senate goes along with the House on Trumpcare 2.0?

Given that they voted without an updated CBO score, we’re just guessing. But the original bill had 24 million losing coverage. We have to define “coverage” to have a good conversation, because the GOP will try to define it so that a plan with a 1 million dollar deductible that only covers hangnails is “coverage.”

Millions will lose coverage because of the end of the Medicaid expansion for working age adults (“expansion Medicaid”). Money to other forms of Medicaid will go down, leading to wait lists, changes in eligibilty, etc. Premiums on older adults will go up, and the help from the feds to cover them will go down. States can waive the 5:1 ratio for older to younger insured (the limit is 3:1 now).

All of that was in the original scored bill, I think.

New stuff:

States can waive essential health benefits, meaning plans can be offered that don’t cover anything. States can waive community rating, meaning that while people must be permitted to purchase health insurance from any insurer, the insurer can charge whatever they want. Large employers can choose to allow their insurers to apply lifetime caps.

All of that looks terrible for real coverage. Again, that’s going to make the conversation be about defining “real coverage.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wonky](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wonky/32/393_2.png) [@wonky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wonky)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2017, 7:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-repeal-of-obamacare-aca-step-bystep-inch-by-inch/776146/644 "2017-05-04T19:37:24Z")

</div>

> [@PastTense](#):
>
> No. If it wasn’t that close they would have passed the version a few weeks ago–and they wouldn’t have been making last minute deals to add a very small number of votes.

I’m just saying that quite a few if not all of those 20 would have voted for it if they needed to for passage. They didn’t want to because it’s politically unpopular, but they were forced to by the party. After the first non vote, they started threatening loss of committees to anyone who strayed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bridget\_Burke](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/7cd45c/32.png) [@Bridget\_Burke](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bridget_Burke)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2017, 7:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-repeal-of-obamacare-aca-step-bystep-inch-by-inch/776146/645 "2017-05-04T19:40:33Z")

</div>

> [@elucidator](#):
>
> And now the news about Republican House members flying home and opening “town hall” meetings to bask in the loving approval of their constituents.
> 
> Well, maybe not. Probably not, actually.

They’re flying to their secluded vacation homes. Otherwise, I’d love to have the Torch & Pitchfork Concession!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Pig](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/c57346/32.png) [@Little\_Pig](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Pig)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2017, 7:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-repeal-of-obamacare-aca-step-bystep-inch-by-inch/776146/646 "2017-05-04T19:49:43Z")

</div>

> [@Bridget\_Burke](#):
>
> They’re flying to their secluded vacation homes. Otherwise, I’d love to have the Torch & Pitchfork Concession!

I got dibs on the Fresh Fruit and Rotting Vegetable Concession!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Pig](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/c57346/32.png) [@Little\_Pig](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Pig)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2017, 7:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-repeal-of-obamacare-aca-step-bystep-inch-by-inch/776146/647 "2017-05-04T19:54:24Z")

</div>

GOP Promises Americans Will Be Able [To Keep Current Medical Conditions](http://www.theonion.com/article/gop-promises-americans-will-be-able-keep-current-m-54995) If Obamacare Repealed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wonky](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wonky/32/393_2.png) [@wonky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wonky)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2017, 7:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-repeal-of-obamacare-aca-step-bystep-inch-by-inch/776146/648 "2017-05-04T19:59:27Z")

</div>

> [@Little\_Pig](#):
>
> GOP Promises Americans Will Be Able [To Keep Current Medical Conditions](http://www.theonion.com/article/gop-promises-americans-will-be-able-keep-current-m-54995) If Obamacare Repealed.

_snerk_

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jophiel](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jophiel/32/66_2.png) [@Jophiel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jophiel)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2017, 8:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-repeal-of-obamacare-aca-step-bystep-inch-by-inch/776146/649 "2017-05-04T20:20:00Z")

</div>

> [@jsgoddess](#):
>
> It likely wasn’t as close as that vote shows. They were trying to protect some of their vulnerable members by having as few vote for this toxic stew as possible.

Worked for the Democrats in 2010 :rolleyes:

I have to give the GOP credit. They must be REALLY confident that everyone will love their health care in 2018 since they own it 100% now and think it’s worth throwing a beer bash over. With the razor thin margin, each person who voted for it gets to be “One of the deciding votes” who celebrated taking insurance away from 20,000,000+ Americans with a beer party.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Whack-a-Mole](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/whack-a-mole/32/141_2.png) [@Whack-a-Mole](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Whack-a-Mole)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2017, 8:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-repeal-of-obamacare-aca-step-bystep-inch-by-inch/776146/650 "2017-05-04T20:36:43Z")

</div>

[Senate won’t vote on House-passed healthcare bill](http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/senate-wont-vote-on-house-passed-healthcare-bill/article/2622152)

They say they will write their own bill.

I think they know how toxic this one is and that they almost certainly will not be able to get all republicans behind it so the best dodge they have is to write their own bill which can take as long as they need it to take including never.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wonky](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wonky/32/393_2.png) [@wonky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wonky)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2017, 8:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-repeal-of-obamacare-aca-step-bystep-inch-by-inch/776146/651 "2017-05-04T20:37:49Z")

</div>

> [@Jophiel](#):
>
> Worked for the Democrats in 2010 :rolleyes:
> 
> I have to give the GOP credit. They must be REALLY confident that everyone will love their health care in 2018 since they own it 100% now and think it’s worth throwing a beer bash over. With the razor thin margin, each person who voted for it gets to be “One of the deciding votes” who celebrated taking insurance away from 20,000,000+ Americans with a beer party.

Yeah, that strikes me as really stupid.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wonky](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wonky/32/393_2.png) [@wonky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wonky)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2017, 8:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-repeal-of-obamacare-aca-step-bystep-inch-by-inch/776146/652 "2017-05-04T20:45:12Z")

</div>

> [@Whack-a-Mole](#):
>
> [Senate won’t vote on House-passed healthcare bill](http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/senate-wont-vote-on-house-passed-healthcare-bill/article/2622152)
> 
> They say they will write their own bill.
> 
> I think they know how toxic this one is and that they almost certainly will not be able to get all republicans behind it so the best dodge they have is to write their own bill which can take as long as they need it to take including never.

The line between writing their own and modifying the House bill can be really slim.

The Senate can easily pass something really awful. It may tone down some of what the House did, but per-capita caps in Medicaid are possible or likely. Getting rid of the Medicaid expansion but doing it more slowly is possible or likely. Changes to essential health benefits, changing the way tax credits are structured, more emphasis on things that only help wealthier people like extending the limits on HSAs, etc. Collins and Murkowski might not go along with stripping Planned Parenthood, but both are politics, not policy, oriented.

DO NOT COUNT ON THE SENATE to do anything approaching “the right thing” on their own. It will require pressure. As much as can be brought to bear.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Budget\_Player\_Cadet](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/budget_player_cadet/32/205_2.png) [@Budget\_Player\_Cadet](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Budget_Player_Cadet)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2017, 8:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-repeal-of-obamacare-aca-step-bystep-inch-by-inch/776146/653 "2017-05-04T20:48:17Z")

</div>

> [@jsgoddess](#):
>
> DO NOT COUNT ON THE SENATE to do anything approaching “the right thing” on their own. It will require pressure. As much as can be brought to bear.

I reiterate: given how many lives are on the line, a straight-up lynch mob in, let’s just say Kentucky wouldn’t be out of line.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wonky](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wonky/32/393_2.png) [@wonky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wonky)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2017, 8:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-repeal-of-obamacare-aca-step-bystep-inch-by-inch/776146/654 "2017-05-04T20:49:19Z")

</div>

> [@Budget\_Player\_Cadet](#):
>
> I reiterate: given how many lives are on the line, a straight-up lynch mob in, let’s just say Kentucky wouldn’t be out of line.

Stop being stupid.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2017, 9:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-repeal-of-obamacare-aca-step-bystep-inch-by-inch/776146/655 "2017-05-04T21:12:02Z")

</div>

> [@jsgoddess](#):
>
> Given that they voted without an updated CBO score, we’re just guessing. But the original bill had 24 million losing coverage.

I am at a loss to understand your faith in the CBO.

For the original Obamacare, the CBO predicted that CBO predicted that in 2016 there would be 23 million covered through the exchanges by 2016.

In fact, it was 10.4 million.

Is it possible that the CBO could be. . .um. . . well, wrong?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Whack-a-Mole](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/whack-a-mole/32/141_2.png) [@Whack-a-Mole](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Whack-a-Mole)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2017, 9:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-repeal-of-obamacare-aca-step-bystep-inch-by-inch/776146/656 "2017-05-04T21:15:16Z")

</div>

> [@jsgoddess](#):
>
> The line between writing their own and modifying the House bill can be really slim.
> 
> The Senate can easily pass something really awful. It may tone down some of what the House did, but per-capita caps in Medicaid are possible or likely. Getting rid of the Medicaid expansion but doing it more slowly is possible or likely. Changes to essential health benefits, changing the way tax credits are structured, more emphasis on things that only help wealthier people like extending the limits on HSAs, etc. Collins and Murkowski might not go along with stripping Planned Parenthood, but both are politics, not policy, oriented.
> 
> DO NOT COUNT ON THE SENATE to do anything approaching “the right thing” on their own. It will require pressure. As much as can be brought to bear.

It may not be as slim as you think. This is going to the senate as a reconciliation bill which means it cannot be filibustered. Because of that though not all provisions will make it to the floor. It will be up to the Senate parliamentarian (un-elected official) to decide what makes it. He could tear our big chunks.

As you said Collins and Muskowski will oppose blocks to PP funding and more than a few republican senators will not abide cuts to medicare and the cutting pre-existing condition protections is outright toxic.

Remember some of these were sticking points in the House which killed the first pass at this (IIRC the Freedom Caucus held out for cuts to pre-existing conditions). If the senate sends back a hash of the House bill I am not sure the two can reconcile them.

That said I agree the Senate cannot be counted on to be nice about this. I just think they will fight with the House more than many suppose over it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ann\_Hedonia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ann_hedonia/32/319_2.png) [@Ann\_Hedonia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ann_Hedonia)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2017, 9:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-repeal-of-obamacare-aca-step-bystep-inch-by-inch/776146/657 "2017-05-04T21:18:40Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> I am at a loss to understand your faith in the CBO.
> 
> For the original Obamacare, the CBO predicted that CBO predicted that in 2016 there would be 23 million covered through the exchanges by 2016.
> 
> In fact, it was 10.4 million.
> 
> Is it possible that the CBO could be. . .um. . . well, wrong?

I imagine that the original CBO didn’t take into account the states that refused to set up exchanges and refused the Medicaid expansion. I bet they didn’t take into account the effects of the massively irresponsible ad campaign aimed at getting young people to go uninsured and the general instability in the insurance markets caused by their constant threats of repeal.

It’s OK to complain that your new car doesn’t perform as well as Consumer Reports lead you to believe it would, but not after you slashed the tires and drilled holes in the gas tank.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2017, 9:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-repeal-of-obamacare-aca-step-bystep-inch-by-inch/776146/658 "2017-05-04T21:23:23Z")

</div>

Just so we’re clear. You’re not actually saying that this bill is a good thing, or that it will improve lives for Americans in a substantial or meaningful way. You are just throwing a bit of shade on **jsgoddess** for bringing up the CBO scores?

> [@](#):
>
> …the CBO predicted that CBO predicted that…

Tonight, on _Its the Mind_, we examine the phenomenon of _deja verb_, that strange feeling you sometimes get that you have typed the same thing before…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ambrosio\_Spinola](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/9de0a6/32.png) [@Ambrosio\_Spinola](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ambrosio_Spinola)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2017, 10:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-repeal-of-obamacare-aca-step-bystep-inch-by-inch/776146/659 "2017-05-04T22:04:31Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> I am at a loss to understand your faith in the CBO.
> 
> For the original Obamacare, the CBO predicted that CBO predicted that in 2016 there would be 23 million covered through the exchanges by 2016.
> 
> In fact, it was 10.4 million.
> 
> Is it possible that the CBO could be. . .um. . . well, wrong?

The CBO also _underestimated_ the [number of people that would be insured under Medicaid](http://www.factcheck.org/2017/03/cbos-obamacare-predictions-how-accurate/). And despite what it got wrong it [was closer in its estimates](http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2015/dec/cbo-crystal-ball-forecast-aca) than many other estimators.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![running\_coach](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/running_coach/32/15836_2.png) [@running\_coach](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/running_coach)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2017, 10:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-repeal-of-obamacare-aca-step-bystep-inch-by-inch/776146/660 "2017-05-04T22:12:16Z")

</div>

> [@Ambrosio\_Spinola](#):
>
> The CBO also _underestimated_ the [number of people that would be insured under Medicaid](http://www.factcheck.org/2017/03/cbos-obamacare-predictions-how-accurate/). And despite what it got wrong it [was closer in its estimates](http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2015/dec/cbo-crystal-ball-forecast-aca) than many other estimators.

There’s also the fact that conditions changed after the original evaluation. And revised estimates were made.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-repeal-of-obamacare-aca-step-bystep-inch-by-inch/776146.md?page=32)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-repeal-of-obamacare-aca-step-bystep-inch-by-inch/776146.md?page=34)
