The representation of youth in movies and TV. Who got it right? Who got it wrong?

As it happens, my high school was in the very same athletic conference as Tyler Robert E. Lee, which seems to be the high school portrayed in D&C.—though the moonlight tower is an Austin thing. I graduated in 1975.

Hazing of the incoming athletes (and probably cheerleaders as well) had been ended around 1973 in my high school; I’m guessing there was either some incident of going too far or it was related to the sticky problems of racial integration going on in the same time period. I don’t know if it ever typically involved “licks,” though those were still common teacher-administered punishment for students. I mainly remember the 10th-graders having their hair shaved by the seniors to show their commitment to the team. “Running the gauntlet” of boys wielding paddles or taking punches was a commonly rumored initiation, even for things like Boy Scouts Order of the Arrow. However, I never actually witnessed or heard a reliable firsthand account of such a hazing incident.

My head of department has kids that are the Inbetweeners’ ages (so they were at college when the show was running), and vouched for its portrayal of that age group. (They apparently drove him nuts by appropriating the ‘Friends…special friends!!’ catchphrase from one of the episodes). I do’nt teach at college, but completely understand the headteacher on the show when I deal with my freshers!

I like the show, but what’s funny on the show is excruciating when you’re stuck on a packed train with them first thing in the morning – it’s well worth getting up 30 minutes earlier to avoid the real life Jays and Wills, &c. :slight_smile:

I thought the Brady kids were actually very realistic. I read somewhere that they made their own props (if they needed a basketball, they brought a used one from home, if they needed a sign, that their character made, that actor actually made it) and chose their own clothes for the show, so that may have been part of it; but they got upset at things like being teased over stuttering, or being compared to an older sibling, and it was of earth-shattering importance to that kid. Their problems didn’t have real-world gravitas, like getting molested, or having a friend die, or even having to participate in some kind of charity to end world hunger. You wouldn’t have even known a war was going on, because honestly, the Vietnam War didn’t weigh heavily on children unless they had a parent overseas. Many were barely aware it was happening.

I think this is one reason the show has been in constant reruns since it went off the air. Technology and the political landscape change, but the sorts of things that children worry about don’t. My son worries about a lot of the same things that troubled me when I was eight. I work very hard to remember how important those things were to me when I was eight, and not dismiss them not that I have perspective on them as my own problems; the point isn’t what I know now, but what he is going through.

Also, the kids were allowed to yell at each other, and get into fights over stupid things, and cry over things kids cry over, and not for adult entertainment, like when the kids on a show for adults fight over something trivial (think, Modern Family), but as a catharsis for the child audience the show was aimed at.

Children on most shows are either too precocious, too evil, or too dumb. It’s OK on a show for adults where it’s played for laughs, especially one where the adults aren’t very realistic either, but it’s unforgivable on a show for kids.

I always related really well to the younger daughter on One Day at a Time. She was about four years older than I was, but I still thought she was a lot like teenagers I knew. The older daughter was too old for me to relate to, but I didn’t find her unrealistic. There were a lot of things about that show that were unrealistic-- the newly divorced mother with no college found a good job way too easy, and was too much at ease in her single-parent role from the start, but I didn’t pay much attention to that.