# The Republicans Can STFU About "Job Creators"

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-republicans-can-stfu-about-job-creators/597081>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [September 21, 2011, 4:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-republicans-can-stfu-about-job-creators/597081 "2011-09-21T16:47:14Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cheesesteak](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cheesesteak/32/3694_2.png) [@Cheesesteak](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cheesesteak)\
**Post date:** [September 22, 2011, 5:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-republicans-can-stfu-about-job-creators/597081/81 "2011-09-22T17:32:12Z")

</div>

> [@RickJay](#):
>
> Microeconomics adds up.

Yes, but the problem is for every success story, like your friend, there’s another company out there losing revenue because his customers are now spending money somewhere else. You have to add them all up, not just the successes.

What is possible for one person to do is impossible for an entire class of people to do, because frequently, success is a zero sum game. My success comes at someone else’s expense.

It’s like the “get a better job” argument. Yes, I can get a better job, Joe down the street can get a better job, but 10 million people can’t all get a better job at the same time. It’s a realistic argument for one person with financial problems, it’s an unrealistic argument when discussing a nationwide problem with poverty.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BobLibDem](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/boblibdem/32/3149_2.png) [@BobLibDem](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BobLibDem)\
**Post date:** [September 22, 2011, 5:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-republicans-can-stfu-about-job-creators/597081/82 "2011-09-22T17:35:04Z")

</div>

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> [Here you go.](http://www.sba.gov/advocacy/7495/8420)
> 
> From the SBA.

Thanks but I doubt the data. I’d like to know if they are counting the ones that go under each year. Plus 52% seems WAY too many home-based jobs. Are they counting the fools that fall for work at home schemes?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [September 22, 2011, 5:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-republicans-can-stfu-about-job-creators/597081/83 "2011-09-22T17:39:57Z")

</div>

> [@BobLibDem](#):
>
> Thanks but I doubt the data. I’d like to know if they are counting the ones that go under each year. Plus 52% seems WAY too many home-based jobs. Are they counting the fools that fall for work at home schemes?

It says “net”, so it does count the ones lost.

It’s the government’s data. I don’t think you’re going to find anything better..

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr\_Smashy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/2bfe46/32.png) [@Mr\_Smashy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr_Smashy)\
**Post date:** [September 22, 2011, 5:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-republicans-can-stfu-about-job-creators/597081/84 "2011-09-22T17:47:08Z")

</div>

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> It says “net”, so it does count the ones lost.
> 
> It’s the government’s data. I don’t think you’re going to find anything better..

It would be better if it agreed with his preconceptions.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BobLibDem](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/boblibdem/32/3149_2.png) [@BobLibDem](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BobLibDem)\
**Post date:** [September 22, 2011, 5:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-republicans-can-stfu-about-job-creators/597081/85 "2011-09-22T17:52:11Z")

</div>

Meh. It may be a government agency, but they have a mission to create data that looks the way they want it. If over half the jobs are home-based, how good are they?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TriPolar](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tripolar/32/3008_2.png) [@TriPolar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TriPolar)\
**Post date:** [September 22, 2011, 6:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-republicans-can-stfu-about-job-creators/597081/86 "2011-09-22T18:02:01Z")

</div>

> [@BobLibDem](#):
>
> Meh. It may be a government agency, but they have a mission to create data that looks the way they want it. If over half the jobs are home-based, how good are they?

Look **Bob** , small businesses create more jobs because they are generally more labor intensive enterprises. Also, there is a minimum number of employees to maintain most businesses that does not grow proportionally with the size of a business. For instance a very small business with 10 employees may need a full time accountant. But the same business grown to 100 employees probably doesn’t need 10 accountants. Finally, there are way, way, way more small businesses than large businesses. So you don’t need the figures to see that small businesses are likely to be the best source for jobs. And since the figures confirm that, what is the basis for your argument?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [September 22, 2011, 6:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-republicans-can-stfu-about-job-creators/597081/87 "2011-09-22T18:05:39Z")

</div>

Also, keep in mind that when the government uses the term “small business” it doesn’t just mean Mom and Pop type businesses. Small business are generally 500 employees or less or ~ $7M in revenue. That covers a lot of ground.

Now, a business doesn’t fundamentally change when it goes from 500 to 501 employees, or from $7M to $7.1M in revenue. But the definition has to be quantitative, and that is what the government, in all its wisdom, has deemed to be relevant.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dangerosa](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/22d042/32.png) [@Dangerosa](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dangerosa)\
**Post date:** [September 22, 2011, 6:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-republicans-can-stfu-about-job-creators/597081/88 "2011-09-22T18:55:08Z")

</div>

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> But still, there can be no disagreement that job growth comes from small businesses primarily. That is, as they try to become “big” businesses. Most won’t, but you can’t know in advance which ones those will be.

Well, to some extent you can. As was pointed out, most “small businesses” are sole proprietorships - or inherently small. My dentist is never going to employ 5,000 people, she’ll employ three, maybe four. A receptionist who also handles all the billing/insurance/business management stuff, two hygenists and herself. My brother in law is a small business - he’s a CRNA - he employs himself. He isn’t hiring anyone. My personal accountant isn’t likely to become Price Waterhouse Coopers. The guys who run my favorite restaurant employ about fifteen people, they aren’t interested in becoming the next Ruth’s Chris. My dogwalker isn’t about to open up a factory and create demand. My lawnservice guy isn’t interested in being Chemlawn - right now its just him, he might get big enough to hire a few college kids during the summer.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Beware\_of\_Doug](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/278dde/32.png) [@Beware\_of\_Doug](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Beware_of_Doug)\
**Post date:** [September 22, 2011, 7:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-republicans-can-stfu-about-job-creators/597081/89 "2011-09-22T19:34:31Z")

</div>

> [@The\_Hamster\_King](#):
>
> Nope. Demand ALWAYS comes first. You can have the best-run and best-funded company in the world and if it’s making something no one wants, it will fail.

The stakes are much higher than that today. If that company isn’t making something _lots and lots_ of people want, or isn’t in a position to dominate in at least one sector of the industry, it will fail. It’s not just about demand from customers; it’s about competitiveness _within_ industry.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gonzomax](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e8c25b/32.png) [@gonzomax](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gonzomax)\
**Post date:** [September 22, 2011, 8:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-republicans-can-stfu-about-job-creators/597081/90 "2011-09-22T20:41:27Z")

</div>

> [@Beware\_of\_Doug](#):
>
> The stakes are much higher than that today. If that company isn’t making something _lots and lots_ of people want, or isn’t in a position to dominate in at least one sector of the industry, it will fail. It’s not just about demand from customers; it’s about competitiveness _within_ industry.

Not really. Big companies don’t compete, they carve up areas and charge about the same, like cell phone, gas companies and cable providers. They know they have a demand. But they can maintain a high profit margin by not fighting over customers.  
Competition in most fields died long ago.  
Small businesses like restaurants and bakeries depend on local customers to keep them alive. If a big national chain moves in they die.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Beware\_of\_Doug](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/278dde/32.png) [@Beware\_of\_Doug](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Beware_of_Doug)\
**Post date:** [September 22, 2011, 8:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-republicans-can-stfu-about-job-creators/597081/91 "2011-09-22T20:45:24Z")

</div>

I sure hope you’re right. I guess I was concerned with small players in industries dominated by big ones. _They_ really have no chance anymore.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TriPolar](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tripolar/32/3008_2.png) [@TriPolar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TriPolar)\
**Post date:** [September 22, 2011, 8:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-republicans-can-stfu-about-job-creators/597081/92 "2011-09-22T20:51:45Z")

</div>

> [@gonzomax](#):
>
> Not really. Big companies don’t compete, they carve up areas and charge about the same, like cell phone, gas companies and cable providers. They know they have a demand. But they can maintain a high profit margin by not fighting over customers.  
> Competition in most fields died long ago.  
> Small businesses like restaurants and bakeries depend on local customers to keep them alive. If a big national chain moves in they die.

Big companies do compete. They just don’t compete fairly. They certainly don’t cooperate as much as you think.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zeriel](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/58956e/32.png) [@Zeriel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zeriel)\
**Post date:** [September 22, 2011, 9:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-republicans-can-stfu-about-job-creators/597081/93 "2011-09-22T21:44:23Z")

</div>

> [@Beware\_of\_Doug](#):
>
> I sure hope you’re right. I guess I was concerned with small players in industries dominated by big ones. _They_ really have no chance anymore.

Not always true. I’m working for a small player (~$6mil) in an industry with 3-4 players in the tens or hundreds of millions in revenue.

Yet we own certain industry segments, AND we are worried about small up and comers eating our lunch.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SteveG1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/bb73d2/32.png) [@SteveG1](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SteveG1)\
**Post date:** [September 22, 2011, 9:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-republicans-can-stfu-about-job-creators/597081/94 "2011-09-22T21:55:53Z")

</div>

> [@BrainGlutton](#):
>
> So, who **are** the job creators? And how do I sacrifice a chicken to them?
> 
> Yes, a chicken. If I could afford a goat I wouldn’t be asking.

This board needs a LIKE button 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RickJay](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/bb73d2/32.png) [@RickJay](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RickJay)\
**Post date:** [September 22, 2011, 10:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-republicans-can-stfu-about-job-creators/597081/95 "2011-09-22T22:31:12Z")

</div>

> [@Cheesesteak](#):
>
> What is possible for one person to do is impossible for an entire class of people to do, because frequently, success is a zero sum game.

When you say things like “success is a zero sum game” in defiance of all evidence and common sense, it makes me doubt if we’re discussing the same universe.

The economy is not zero sum. People, on the whole, can get wealthier, and in fact that has been the general trend for quite a long time now - people have in fact gotten MUCH wealthier. Yes, we’re in recession right now. It won’t last forever, just as the last one didn’t last forever.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gonzomax](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e8c25b/32.png) [@gonzomax](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gonzomax)\
**Post date:** [September 22, 2011, 10:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-republicans-can-stfu-about-job-creators/597081/96 "2011-09-22T22:41:48Z")

</div>

> [@RickJay](#):
>
> When you say things like “success is a zero sum game” in defiance of all evidence and common sense, it makes me doubt if we’re discussing the same universe.
> 
> The economy is not zero sum. People, on the whole, can get wealthier, and in fact that has been the general trend for quite a long time now - people have in fact gotten MUCH wealthier. Yes, we’re in recession right now. It won’t last forever, just as the last one didn’t last forever.

The fundamentals are different now. we are not getting richer but poorer. Opportunities are shrinking with pay. But now our corporations are on a world stage with every intention of getting the cheapest labor possible. They will ship your job abroad happily if they get someone to do it for 1.3rd the price.  
But that is a short term resolution with long term damage. Our corporations deal in short term intervals. They get bonuses on yearly performance. Dumping workers will make the books look good every year. There is a long term problem though. The ability of the lower paid and poor people to buy is being harmed. Demand is dropping. The theory was that China and India would be able to compensate for the drop in American demand.  
But that is not happening. Overall demand is dropping. The American buying machine was the engine of the economy. It is sputtering.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rat\_avatar](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/rat_avatar/32/255_2.png) [@rat\_avatar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/rat_avatar)\
**Post date:** [September 22, 2011, 11:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-republicans-can-stfu-about-job-creators/597081/97 "2011-09-22T23:52:44Z")

</div>

> [@gonzomax](#):
>
> The fundamentals are different now. we are not getting richer but poorer. Opportunities are shrinking with pay. But now our corporations are on a world stage with every intention of getting the cheapest labor possible. They will ship your job abroad happily if they get someone to do it for 1.3rd the price.  
> But that is a short term resolution with long term damage. Our corporations deal in short term intervals. They get bonuses on yearly performance. Dumping workers will make the books look good every year. There is a long term problem though. The ability of the lower paid and poor people to buy is being harmed. Demand is dropping. The theory was that China and India would be able to compensate for the drop in American demand.  
> But that is not happening. Overall demand is dropping. The American buying machine was the engine of the economy. It is sputtering.

I don’t have a dog in this fight but you may want to look at this

[http://www.census.gov/econ/smallbus.html](http://www.census.gov/econ/smallbus.html)

Most jobs are not from the mega corps.

Really both sides are silly, and IMHO government never “creates” jobs all it can possibly do is discourage job creation through fear and doubt.

But that doesn’t win you elections

(full disclosure I am in no way a Republican)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![emacknight](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/3ec8ea/32.png) [@emacknight](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/emacknight)\
**Post date:** [September 22, 2011, 11:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-republicans-can-stfu-about-job-creators/597081/98 "2011-09-22T23:58:58Z")

</div>

> [@rat\_avatar](#):
>
> (full disclosure I am in no way a Republican)

ha HA you are now!

That’s exactly the kind of thing a Republican would say.

I bet you’re rich.

Why do you hate America?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stately\_Greek\_Automaton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/aca169/32.png) [@Stately\_Greek\_Automaton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stately_Greek_Automaton)\
**Post date:** [September 23, 2011, 1:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-republicans-can-stfu-about-job-creators/597081/99 "2011-09-23T01:14:09Z")

</div>

> [@TriPolar](#):
>
> Who demanded iPhones before they were invented? Who craves some particular brand of coffee before they hear of it? People demanded a good 5 cent cigar for a long time, but never got one. The demand for many consumer products is created by businesses. That doesn’t make every business a demand creator, or job creator, but demand is something that is often created, and demand creation is a big part of business.

I was actually thinking of iPhones as a specific example of the exception that proves the rule, but thinking more about it, it’s really not the case. First of all, although there may not have been a demand for iPhones in particular, you could certainly make a case for handheld electronics being in pretty high demand. Just think of handheld videogames, laptops, mobile phones, PDAs, etc. Secondly, look at how smartphones were designed prior to the iPhone and how they were designed after. Apple certainly was ahead of the curve, but companies such as LG, Samsung, HTC, etc waited for there to be a demand before making something iPhone-like.

Although I don’t entirely disagree with the thought that demand can be created, I think it’s a much rarer event.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PigArcher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/bcef8e/32.png) [@PigArcher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/PigArcher)\
**Post date:** [September 23, 2011, 1:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-republicans-can-stfu-about-job-creators/597081/100 "2011-09-23T01:26:08Z")

</div>

> [@rat\_avatar](#):
>
> MHO government never “creates” jobs all it can possibly do is discourage job creation through fear and doubt.

You’re certainly entitled to your opinions, but can you offer any facts that support it? Especially considering the mountains of evidence to the contrary?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-republicans-can-stfu-about-job-creators/597081.md?page=4)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-republicans-can-stfu-about-job-creators/597081.md?page=6)
