# The Rittenhouse trial

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-rittenhouse-trial/953798>\
**Category:** Miscellaneous and Personal Stuff I Must Share\
**Created:** [November 4, 2021, 2:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-rittenhouse-trial/953798 "2021-11-04T14:56:58Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 56

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JRDelirious](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jrdelirious/32/9531_2.png) [@JRDelirious](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JRDelirious)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2021, 6:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-rittenhouse-trial/953798/1103 "2021-11-19T18:45:49Z")

</div>

> [@Martin\_Hyde](#):
>
> It was never demonstrated to any high degree of evidence he pointed a gun at anyone until he was being attacked.

The jurors apparently felt the verifiable introduced evidence showed him merely _carrying_ the firearm, _until_ there is the confrontation. If there was evidence of him brandishing in a threatening fashion before, it wasn’t brought up very strongly.

Now, entirely separate from that is the perceived notion that this means if you are visibly armed, then it is up to any reasonable person _not_ to interfere with you in ANY manner (because why else would you be interfering with me except to take my gun and kill me 🙄 ). That is a whole separate can of worms.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![not\_what\_you\_d\_expect](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/not_what_you_d_expect/32/3246_2.png) [@not\_what\_you\_d\_expect](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/not_what_you_d_expect)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2021, 6:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-rittenhouse-trial/953798/1104 "2021-11-19T18:46:14Z")

</div>

I very much doubt he will continue nursing studies. He has a job offer from Matt Gaetz already. He’s the new darling of the right so I won’t be surprised to see him go in a political direction.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![k9bfriender](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/k9bfriender/32/3283_2.png) [@k9bfriender](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/k9bfriender)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2021, 6:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-rittenhouse-trial/953798/1105 "2021-11-19T18:46:42Z")

</div>

> [@Martin\_Hyde](#):
>
> Rittenhouse was not the first and likely if he had been convicted it may have just enraged some of these people and made them even more prone to do violence on the street.

If they knew that they would be held accountable for that violence, then they may be less prone. Since they now know that they can kill demonstrators with a simple, “I was scared.” they will do so.

No matter what situation they have to put themselves into in order to justify fearing for their life, they will find a way.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Crane](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/crane/32/3495_2.png) [@Crane](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Crane)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2021, 6:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-rittenhouse-trial/953798/1106 "2021-11-19T18:47:22Z")

</div>

> [@aceplace57](#):
>
> Kyle continues his nursing studies in Arizona.

No need to. He’s the vigilante ICON. He can monetize his fame.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mmmiiikkkeee](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/edb3f5/32.png) [@mmmiiikkkeee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mmmiiikkkeee)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2021, 6:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-rittenhouse-trial/953798/1107 "2021-11-19T18:47:41Z")

</div>

So you agree this shows you can kill people on the streets under certain circumstances. Kinda defeats your previous claim hoping it shows you you can’t…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Martin\_Hyde](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/47e85d/32.png) [@Martin\_Hyde](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Martin_Hyde)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2021, 6:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-rittenhouse-trial/953798/1108 "2021-11-19T18:47:51Z")

</div>

> [@JRDelirious](#):
>
> > [@Martin\_Hyde](#):
> >
> > It was never demonstrated to any high degree of evidence he pointed a gun at anyone until he was being attacked.
> 
> Right, the verifiable introduced evidence apparently shows him merely _carrying_ the firearm, _until_ there is the confrontation. If there was evidence of him brandishing in a threatening fashion before, it wasn’t brought up very strongly.
> 
> Now, entirely separate from that is the perceived notion that this means if you are visibly armed, then it is up to any reasonable person _not_ to interfere with you in ANY manner (because why else would you be interfering with me except to take my gun and kill me 🙄 ). That is a whole separate can of worms.

I’ll again note, hundreds of people in Kenosha that night were armed, and similar protests and counterprotests frequently feature large numbers of armed people. There are several right and left wing groups (including some all-black groups) that deliberately go to protests openly armed.

We’ve had this happen at hundreds and hundreds of protests across the country and involving many thousands of armed people. And we’ve had a small handful of shootings that I’m aware of, specifically that involve the protesters / counter protesters. I think the baseline view that someone walking around in an open carry state at a protest with a gun is even worthy of special attention, let alone someone you need to confront, is an incredibly flawed premise. I hope that people show better judgment than Rosenbaum did in the future.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Biotop](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/biotop/32/321_2.png) [@Biotop](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Biotop)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2021, 6:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-rittenhouse-trial/953798/1109 "2021-11-19T18:48:50Z")

</div>

I stand corrected.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![not\_what\_you\_d\_expect](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/not_what_you_d_expect/32/3246_2.png) [@not\_what\_you\_d\_expect](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/not_what_you_d_expect)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2021, 6:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-rittenhouse-trial/953798/1110 "2021-11-19T18:50:42Z")

</div>

The original Protest where Kyle shot these three men was about the shooting of a black man.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Martin\_Hyde](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/47e85d/32.png) [@Martin\_Hyde](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Martin_Hyde)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2021, 6:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-rittenhouse-trial/953798/1111 "2021-11-19T18:50:56Z")

</div>

> [@mmmiiikkkeee](#):
>
> So you agree this shows you can kill people on the streets under certain circumstances. Kinda defeats your previous claim hoping it shows you you can’t…

> [@k9bfriender](#):
>
> If they knew that they would be held accountable for that violence, then they may be less prone. Since they now know that they can kill demonstrators with a simple, “I was scared.” they will do so.
> 
> No matter what situation they have to put themselves into in order to justify fearing for their life, they will find a way.

These are both worthless nonsense posts so I figured I’d lump them together. There is literally no point for you people to keep questioning the existence of the fundamental legal principle of self-defense, which is all you’re doing with these posts. It’s been hashed out to incredible detail (and quite a few people have made high quality posts in all the dreck) over 1,100 posts in this thread. I find absolutely no reason to engage with people who seem to just keep harping on that same point.

In America you can defend yourself with lethal force in certain situations, this is a part of our common law and constitutional system, and is true in all fifty states. It is not my job to argue that basic factual reality with you, and if you don’t like it, it is not my job to fix it. But you simply continue to remain deliberately ignorant of this reality by repetitively making posts that refuse to accept this core factual reality.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2021, 6:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-rittenhouse-trial/953798/1112 "2021-11-19T18:54:13Z")

</div>

Crossing state lines with that weapon looking for trouble had absofuckinglutely NOTHING to do with “self defense”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Martin\_Hyde](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/47e85d/32.png) [@Martin\_Hyde](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Martin_Hyde)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2021, 6:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-rittenhouse-trial/953798/1113 "2021-11-19T18:54:45Z")

</div>

He did not cross state lines with it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Crane](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/crane/32/3495_2.png) [@Crane](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Crane)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2021, 6:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-rittenhouse-trial/953798/1114 "2021-11-19T18:54:56Z")

</div>

> [@Martin\_Hyde](#):
>
> There is absolutely a constitutional right to self-defense.

Where?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eschrodinger](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eschrodinger/32/122_2.png) [@eschrodinger](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/eschrodinger)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2021, 6:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-rittenhouse-trial/953798/1115 "2021-11-19T18:55:02Z")

</div>

> [@Martin\_Hyde](#):
>
> I’ll again note, hundreds of people in Kenosha that night were armed, and similar protests and counterprotests frequently feature large numbers of armed people.

I think it wouldn’t be a bad idea to just ban guns at protests, if it could be done constitutionally. It’s not that different from banning them from bars. Protests can be highly charged, with opposing groups feeling strongly in conflict. Violence of one kind or another can commonly break out. It’s even more dangerous with guns present.

Figuring out how to define the area or groups prohibited would be a big problem, though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mmmiiikkkeee](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/edb3f5/32.png) [@mmmiiikkkeee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mmmiiikkkeee)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2021, 6:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-rittenhouse-trial/953798/1116 "2021-11-19T18:55:55Z")

</div>

> [@mmmiiikkkeee](#):
>
> So you agree this shows you can kill people on the streets under certain circumstances.

> [@Martin\_Hyde](#):
>
> In America you can defend yourself with lethal force in certain situations,

I’m baffled by how antagonistic you’re getting when we are saying the same thing in almost the exact same words.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DeadTreasSecretaries](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/deadtreassecretaries/32/4817_2.png) [@DeadTreasSecretaries](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DeadTreasSecretaries)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2021, 6:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-rittenhouse-trial/953798/1117 "2021-11-19T18:55:57Z")

</div>

> [@k9bfriender](#):
>
> No matter what situation they have to put themselves into in order to justify fearing for their life, they will find a way.

99% of the world realizes doing what KR did is very likely to result in you being killed. Anyone dumb enough to do it in the future isn’t going to be deterred by a guilty verdict.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![k9bfriender](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/k9bfriender/32/3283_2.png) [@k9bfriender](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/k9bfriender)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2021, 6:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-rittenhouse-trial/953798/1118 "2021-11-19T18:57:32Z")

</div>

> [@Martin\_Hyde](#):
>
> I hope the 2 dead and 1 wounded stand as a lesson to future criminals who believe you can attack people on the street with impunity

The do, they stand as a lesson that you _can_ attack people on the street with impunity.

You can shoot them dead, and you will be found innocent of all charges. Probably even get a speaking engagement at the next GQP convention.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Martin\_Hyde](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/47e85d/32.png) [@Martin\_Hyde](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Martin_Hyde)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2021, 6:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-rittenhouse-trial/953798/1119 "2021-11-19T18:57:33Z")

</div>

Read the court’s decision in:

- District of Columbia v Heller (2008)
- McDonald v City of Chicago
- Heller v. District of Columbia (2011) (“Heller II”)
- Ezell v City of Chicago
- United States v. Marzzarella

These are all second amendment cases, but all have specific opinions on self-defense that make it clear there is a fundamental right of self-defense. There are also older constitutional norms/ jurisprudence / common law, but suffice that these recent Supreme Court rulings are the most timely ones to today and make the issue quite clear.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Crane](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/crane/32/3495_2.png) [@Crane](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Crane)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2021, 6:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-rittenhouse-trial/953798/1120 "2021-11-19T18:58:09Z")

</div>

> [@Martin\_Hyde](#):
>
> the fundamental legal principle of self-defense,

Is a privilege, not a right

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Martin\_Hyde](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/47e85d/32.png) [@Martin\_Hyde](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Martin_Hyde)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2021, 6:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-rittenhouse-trial/953798/1121 "2021-11-19T18:58:45Z")

</div>

The Supreme Court disagrees. On matters of law we can weigh your opinion vs that of the highest court in our country, and we will find one opinion far more meaningful.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eschrodinger](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eschrodinger/32/122_2.png) [@eschrodinger](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/eschrodinger)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2021, 6:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-rittenhouse-trial/953798/1122 "2021-11-19T18:59:09Z")

</div>

Eh, that’s a pretty dead distinction, legally.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-rittenhouse-trial/953798.md?page=55)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-rittenhouse-trial/953798.md?page=57)
