# the science of Jurassic Park

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-science-of-jurassic-park/84723>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [October 1, 2001, 5:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-science-of-jurassic-park/84723 "2001-10-01T05:17:06Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 9\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pezwookiee](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/9d8465/32.png) [@pezwookiee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pezwookiee)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2001, 5:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-science-of-jurassic-park/84723/1 "2001-10-01T05:17:06Z")

</div>

Can we really clone a dinosaur from DNA found in dino blood found in a mosquito found in some amber? Can we? I want a dinosaur.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Darwins\_Finch](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/darwins_finch/32/20304_2.png) [@Darwins\_Finch](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Darwins_Finch)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2001, 5:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-science-of-jurassic-park/84723/2 "2001-10-01T05:37:22Z")

</div>

Who _wouldn’t_ want a dinosaur?

Such desires aside, however, current technology does not exist to allow dinosaur cloning a la _Jurassic Park_ (and, it does not appear likely that future technology will allow it, either). The main problem appears to be the lengthy sequences of “junk DNA” - without any clue as to what, if anything these sequences do, it would be nigh impossible to get them aligned properly. Keep in mind that even though the mosquito may be preserved, the DNA from both the mosquito and whatever creature served as its last meal will have significantly deteriorated over 65 million years or longer. So we would have, at best, fragments which would have to be pieced together.

Complete mitochondrial sequences have, however, [been sequenced](http://www.ox.ac.uk/blueprint/2000-01/2202/05.shtml) for moas.

[Here](http://www.nhm.ac.uk/science/features/amber.html) is one site which specifically addresses the dinosaur issue.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lemur866](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lemur866/32/434_2.png) [@Lemur866](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lemur866)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2001, 5:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-science-of-jurassic-park/84723/3 "2001-10-01T05:59:22Z")

</div>

Supposing that such a technique is even thinkable, before we start cloning dinosaurs we are going to start with all sorts of other extinct creatures.

We have actual frozen mummies, skins, hair, and dried carcasses of many extinct animals…mammoths, steppe bison, giant ground sloths, dodos, moas, passenger pigeons, thylacines, quaggas, carolina parakeets…

The amount of sub-fossil remains of “recently” extinct animals is many orders of magnitude greater than the amount of blood samples preserved in the gut contents of mosquitoes preserved in amber.

We can uncover whole frozen mammoth carcasses in Alaska and Siberia. With several thousand pounds of frozen tissue to work with the odds of getting a viable sample are millions of times greater. And we wouldn’t have to invent artificial eggs replicators or guess at the incubation techniques…we could implant mammoth embryos in living elephants.

Of course, elephants are already an endangered species, so perhaps creating a mammoth is not such a good idea if it takes the place of a potenatial baby elephant.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jack\_Batty](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jack_batty/32/3201_2.png) [@Jack\_Batty](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jack_Batty)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2001, 5:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-science-of-jurassic-park/84723/4 "2001-10-01T05:59:33Z")

</div>

I think the simple answer to the OP would be this:

Do ya _see_ any dinosaurs walking around?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RickJay](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/bb73d2/32.png) [@RickJay](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RickJay)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2001, 1:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-science-of-jurassic-park/84723/5 "2001-10-01T13:21:21Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Jack Batty \*  
> \*\*I think the simple answer to the OP would be this:
> 
> Do ya _see_ any dinosaurs walking around? \*\*

At least in my case, the probability of a dinosaur sighting is largely dependent on the amount of Sleeman’s Cream Ale I have consumed.

But let’s say you could sequence some dino DNA. What then? Can you just pop it into a chicken egg and expect it to hatch? Can you just inject DNA into any old egg and have a dinosaur burst out of it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Terminus\_Est](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/terminus_est/32/3087_2.png) [@Terminus\_Est](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Terminus_Est)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2001, 3:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-science-of-jurassic-park/84723/6 "2001-10-01T15:12:15Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Jack Batty \*  
> \*\*Do ya _see_ any dinosaurs walking around? \*\*

Not around here, no. I see them _flying_, though. 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bup](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/6bbea6/32.png) [@bup](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bup)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2001, 3:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-science-of-jurassic-park/84723/7 "2001-10-01T15:16:57Z")

</div>

A couple of years ago, somewhere (nice cite, huh?) I read  
that this used to be a speculative way to get dinosaur  
DNA, but then someone actually tried to look at the blood  
in an insect encased in amber, and the DNA was entirely  
destroyed.

Of course, that doesn’t get as much press as Spielberg  
saying “this isn’t science fiction! It’s science  
eventuality!”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pezwookiee](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/9d8465/32.png) [@pezwookiee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pezwookiee)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2001, 9:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-science-of-jurassic-park/84723/8 "2001-10-01T21:55:32Z")

</div>

I still want a dinosaur, but now I also want a wooly mammoth and a mummy. I’ll be the most popular kid in town!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Smeghead](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/f1d935/32.png) [@Smeghead](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Smeghead)\
**Post date:** [October 2, 2001, 12:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-science-of-jurassic-park/84723/9 "2001-10-02T00:32:40Z")

</div>

To date, the total number of dinosaur DNA bases recovered is a couple of hundred. Out of 10[sup]9[/sup] or so.

That would be like trying to recreate “Moby Dick” from the following information:

a j d n p

We’d need to find a _hell_ of a lot more DNA to even make an attempt. And, frankly, there’s probably not enough that’s been preserved to do the job.
