# The seven tenets of The Satanic Temple, compared to other religious guidance

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-seven-tenets-of-the-satanic-temple-compared-to-other-religious-guidance/838100>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [August 3, 2019, 2:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-seven-tenets-of-the-satanic-temple-compared-to-other-religious-guidance/838100 "2019-08-03T02:20:11Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/qadgop_the_mercotan/32/83_2.png) [@Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qadgop_the_Mercotan)\
**Post date:** [August 3, 2019, 9:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-seven-tenets-of-the-satanic-temple-compared-to-other-religious-guidance/838100/21 "2019-08-03T21:43:56Z")

</div>

> [@QuickSilver](#):
>
> It all sound good, but does it fill the pews and the coffers like a bit of magical thinking?

Sadly, no. We UU’s always lag behind the evangelical types and Catholicism when it comes to fund raising and bringing in the BIG crowds. ☹

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Voyager](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/voyager/32/133_2.png) [@Voyager](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Voyager)\
**Post date:** [August 3, 2019, 10:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-seven-tenets-of-the-satanic-temple-compared-to-other-religious-guidance/838100/22 "2019-08-03T22:22:50Z")

</div>

It sounds good, but I’d never join any religion which would have me as a member.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![octopus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/octopus/32/3716_2.png) [@octopus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/octopus)\
**Post date:** [August 4, 2019, 12:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-seven-tenets-of-the-satanic-temple-compared-to-other-religious-guidance/838100/23 "2019-08-04T00:00:16Z")

</div>

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> Here are the seven tenets of the Satanic Temple:
> 
> [The Satanic Temple - About us - TST](https://thesatanictemple.com/pages/tenets)
> 
> \*One should strive to act with compassion and empathy toward all creatures in accordance with reason.
> 
> \*The struggle for justice is an ongoing and necessary pursuit that should prevail over laws and institutions.
> 
> \*One’s body is inviolable, subject to one’s own will alone.
> 
> \*The freedoms of others should be respected, including the freedom to offend. To willfully and unjustly encroach upon the freedoms of another is to forgo one’s own.
> 
> \*Beliefs should conform to one’s best scientific understanding of the world. One should take care never to distort scientific facts to fit one’s beliefs.
> 
> \*People are fallible. If one makes a mistake, one should do one’s best to rectify it and resolve any harm that might have been caused.
> 
> \*Every tenet is a guiding principle designed to inspire nobility in action and thought. The spirit of compassion, wisdom, and justice should always prevail over the written or spoken word.
> 
> I posit that these tenets are far superior to the moral guidance provided in the Ten Commandments or the New Testament of the Bible. I’m not nearly as familiar with the Quran, but in my limited understanding they’re also superior to the guidance of that text.
> 
> Morality being a human construct, this is, of course, just my opinion. But if you disagree, why do you believe your preferred set of religious guidance is superior to these seven tenets? What proper moral behavior do you believe is not covered by these seven?
> 
> I am not a member of The Satanic Temple – just a guy who recently watched the documentary “Hail Satan?” and thought this would be an interesting topic of discussion.

They sound superficially good.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Snowboarder\_Bo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/snowboarder_bo/32/229_2.png) [@Snowboarder\_Bo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Snowboarder_Bo)\
**Post date:** [August 4, 2019, 12:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-seven-tenets-of-the-satanic-temple-compared-to-other-religious-guidance/838100/24 "2019-08-04T00:09:56Z")

</div>

> [@Voyager](#):
>
> It sounds good, but I’d never join any religion which would have me as a member.

You’re missing out; Subgenius devivals are a lot of fun. 😃

signed,

Pope Ignatius Polyester  
(also a Pope in the People’s Catholic Church, natch)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![blindboyard](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/blindboyard/32/2833_2.png) [@blindboyard](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/blindboyard)\
**Post date:** [August 4, 2019, 7:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-seven-tenets-of-the-satanic-temple-compared-to-other-religious-guidance/838100/25 "2019-08-04T07:37:22Z")

</div>

Such lists from actual religions tend to be guidance on how to treat others or on moral obligations. This reads more like a list of rights from some wishy washy UN document, or perhaps a list of reasons for you to have a grievance with someone.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kaylasdad99](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kaylasdad99/32/3398_2.png) [@kaylasdad99](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kaylasdad99)\
**Post date:** [August 4, 2019, 7:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-seven-tenets-of-the-satanic-temple-compared-to-other-religious-guidance/838100/26 "2019-08-04T07:52:08Z")

</div>

> [@kanicbird](#):
>
> I believe there are universal principals, in Buddhism it’s called Dharma; morality comes from those universal principals. All religions come from trying to codify them, and will also depend on the local beliefs and culture. So at the core all religions are based on trying to understand Dharma imperfectly, with a lot of extra stuff thrown in. This is why scientology and jedi religion and likewise, which was made to to be a false religion or fantasy religion actually merges with Dharma.
> 
> The Dharma rule that allows this is ‘seek and you shall find’ which is a biblical principal but I believe it is a universal principal. If one seeks the truth, God or whatever to such a extent where they are willing to give up everything, they will find it. While the founders of such religions may not have that intention, some of the followers will eventually and that will lead it towards the dharma.
> 
> As for Satanic temple, from what I know of it, which is not much, but they have a shocking name but really have knowledge, not Satan, as their gateway. Similar to early gnosticism their use of Satan is not the worshiping the evil one, but rejoicing the wisdom we have obtained with the knowledge gained of good and evil, which those above stated codes seem to indicate.

CONFIDENTIAL to **kanicbird** : PRINCIPLE.

That is all.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GreenHell](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/ea666f/32.png) [@GreenHell](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GreenHell)\
**Post date:** [August 4, 2019, 9:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-seven-tenets-of-the-satanic-temple-compared-to-other-religious-guidance/838100/27 "2019-08-04T09:36:09Z")

</div>

Sage Rat and Slow Moving Vehicle are pretty close to the mark. The idea of offending people is interesting. Satanists (and many who look to the Americans’ Constitution) see religious expression as a sacred right, but there is no right to “not be offended”. The temple uses such offense and the attention it generates to further their agenda. I’m not saying this to be provocative, they freely admit as much. However, for all the hysteria-inducing gloom of their imagery, what with Baphomet, et al, their agenda is just to receive equal treatment for their beliefs from the government. Not superior, but certainly not inferior.

Granted, there may well be a love of attention or mischief. Lucian is a lawyer and Michelle is a model/exotic dancer. It’s certainly conceivable that argumentation or attention may be something to which they are drawn. But, another friend of mine, who is a Humanist preacher raised in the Southern Pentecostal tradition before joining the Community of Reason admitted that he loved the spotlight as well. Enjoying a job or cause doesn’t render it unworthy.

Dear Anton loved his theatrics and much of the Satanic Bible is ridiculous or just gibberish. “Enochian Keys”? :rolleyes: As for where Satan fits into the Satanic Temple; he is a symbol of independence, rebellion, and reason. Lucian and Michelle (I bring these two up again, because I have spoken with them first-hand and they have leadership roles in the organization) see him as a symbol for their values. After all, if we take the Bible at face value, it was the serpent who incited Eve to partake of knowledge. Better to stand on one’s own feet without gods or against them, than be subservient.

As far as symbols go, I myself wear a medal of St. Erasmus of Formia (aka St. Elmo). I do this in solidarity with my wife, as she has fought cancer and been wracked with abdominal pain and St. Erasmus is patron of abdominal pain (as well as childbirth and sailors), to remind her that her pain is always close to my heart. I got her an identical medal that she sometimes wears; mine has not left my neck for more than a few moments in many years. So, one needn’t regard a personage as literally real in order to recognize their potency as symbols.

Neither Michelle nor Julian struck me as Libertarian in the sense it is commonly used now. I don’t remember either of them suggesting that government is greatly over-grown. Rather, they think (rightly) that religious organizations aren’t pulling their weight via their codified exemption from both taxes and the vetting as non-profit agencies to which secular charities have to submit.

All-in-all, most of HSGP regarded Satanists as siblings in belief, though a louder, more controversial, more confrontational version of ourselves. Though, to be fair, we get death-threats, vandalism, etc. too. Were it not for the vulnerability of my family, I’d be just as confrontational, though at my age, I’ve pretty much just given up on America and only want a worker’s visa to emigrate to the First World.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GreenHell](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/ea666f/32.png) [@GreenHell](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GreenHell)\
**Post date:** [August 4, 2019, 9:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-seven-tenets-of-the-satanic-temple-compared-to-other-religious-guidance/838100/28 "2019-08-04T09:39:56Z")

</div>

I’d also disagree with the word “cult”. Though not a word used by clinical personnel, “cult” is nearly universally understood to mean a community or organization containing a dynamic that prioritizes the goals, needs, and wishes of (sometimes) the collective or (usually) the leader over the autonomy of the individual. Individual rights and freedoms are among the most important values of Humanism and Satanism. While courtesy, respect, and civility are expected, dissent is celebrated. By such standards, either community is even less a cult than many secular organizations and virtually all mainstream religions.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kaylasdad99](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kaylasdad99/32/3398_2.png) [@kaylasdad99](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kaylasdad99)\
**Post date:** [August 4, 2019, 12:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-seven-tenets-of-the-satanic-temple-compared-to-other-religious-guidance/838100/29 "2019-08-04T12:44:18Z")

</div>

> [@Dinsdale](#):
>
> Sounds good to me! But please explain, how does Satan fit into it?
> 
> Reminds me of the7 UU principles:  
> Principle 1: The inherent worth and dignity of every person;  
> Principle 2: Justice, equity and compassion in human relations;  
> Principle 3: Acceptance of one another and encouragement to spiritual growth in our congregations;  
> Principle 4: A free and responsible search for truth and meaning;  
> Principle 5: The right of conscience and the use of the democratic process within our congregations and in society at large;  
> Principle 6: The goal of world community with peace, liberty, and justice for all;  
> Principle 7: Respect for the interdependent web of all existence of which we are a part.
> 
> Also good stuff in the Humanist manifestos. Lots of good lessons to live by, when you eliminate the fairy tales.

To be honest, I tend to see the word “Satanic” as being so semantically loaded, that it’s pretty much trolling to use it in your religion’s name.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![QuickSilver](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/quicksilver/32/7832_2.png) [@QuickSilver](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/QuickSilver)\
**Post date:** [August 4, 2019, 12:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-seven-tenets-of-the-satanic-temple-compared-to-other-religious-guidance/838100/30 "2019-08-04T12:47:18Z")

</div>

> [@kaylasdad99](#):
>
> CONFIDENTIAL to **kanicbird** : PRINCIPLE.
> 
> That is all.

Sure, but you need a bureaucrat to be in charge of policy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrDibble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mrdibble/32/114_2.png) [@MrDibble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrDibble)\
**Post date:** [August 4, 2019, 6:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-seven-tenets-of-the-satanic-temple-compared-to-other-religious-guidance/838100/31 "2019-08-04T18:22:14Z")

</div>

It’s not got the pithiness of “Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law”, but it’s as good as you can get without all the coke and smack that goes into a real Beast’s creed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WillFarnaby](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/willfarnaby/32/514_2.png) [@WillFarnaby](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/WillFarnaby)\
**Post date:** [August 4, 2019, 9:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-seven-tenets-of-the-satanic-temple-compared-to-other-religious-guidance/838100/32 "2019-08-04T21:46:10Z")

</div>

The New Testament provided guidance led to the development of western civilization. These concepts wouldn’t have been conceivable absent the existence of Christianity. In some ways these tenets are a better interpretation of of the philosophy of Jesus than some modern Christian sects.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Two\_Many\_Cats](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/8dc957/32.png) [@Two\_Many\_Cats](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Two_Many_Cats)\
**Post date:** [August 5, 2019, 11:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-seven-tenets-of-the-satanic-temple-compared-to-other-religious-guidance/838100/33 "2019-08-05T23:16:31Z")

</div>

Yeah, if the were serious about this, they wouldn’t have chosen the name the Temple of Satan. That would put potential converts off.

If they wanted a symbol of a rebellious font of reason for humanity, why not choose a name like the temple of Prometheus? Same concept, less obnoxious.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kaylasdad99](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kaylasdad99/32/3398_2.png) [@kaylasdad99](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kaylasdad99)\
**Post date:** [August 5, 2019, 11:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-seven-tenets-of-the-satanic-temple-compared-to-other-religious-guidance/838100/34 "2019-08-05T23:31:29Z")

</div>

> [@Two\_Many\_Cats](#):
>
> Yeah, if the were serious about this, they wouldn’t have chosen the name the Temple of Satan. That would put potential converts off.
> 
> If they wanted a symbol of a rebellious font of reason for humanity, why not choose a name like the temple of Prometheus? Same concept, less obnoxious.

Probably because they didn’t have a lot of confidence that people would make the connection with rebellion. OTOH, Satan doesn’t evoke “rebellion” to most people, so much as “evil for its own sake.”

So yeah, Prometheus would’ve been a better choice.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DocCathode](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/doccathode/32/18773_2.png) [@DocCathode](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DocCathode)\
**Post date:** [August 6, 2019, 12:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-seven-tenets-of-the-satanic-temple-compared-to-other-religious-guidance/838100/35 "2019-08-06T00:20:47Z")

</div>

> [@Voyager](#):
>
> No wonder the godly hate them

I consider myself a qualified G-d-botherer and don’t hate them. I feel they could have picked a better name, but I feel they do a lot of good work

> [@Slow\_Moving\_Vehicle](#):
>
> As I understand it, part of TST’s mission is to defend church-state separation. And they use Satanic imagery to do that; when legislators in Arkansas wanted to put a memorial to the Ten Commandments on the grounds of the state capitol, the TST applied to erect a statue of Baphomet nearby, arguing that the Arkansas state legislature could not erect a Judeo-Christian monument but forbid a Satanic one. They got a site permit too, but the Arkansas legislature withdrew permission for the Ten Commandments monument, instead.

NOT a “Judeo-Christian monument” but a Christian one. If it were a Jewish monument, the text would have been in Hebrew. The annoying Christians who made and mounted the thing may have told folks that the monument stood for Judaism too. They lied. The same way the city of Philadelphia lies when they say the lamp post decorations put up each winter are snowflakes. First off, snowflakes have six points not eight. Second, the decorations are obviously rayed crosses. Violates the establishment clause, it does. Pisses me off.

> [@](#):
>
> I think they do very important work, and generally hold them in some regard.

As do I.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DocCathode](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/doccathode/32/18773_2.png) [@DocCathode](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DocCathode)\
**Post date:** [August 6, 2019, 12:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-seven-tenets-of-the-satanic-temple-compared-to-other-religious-guidance/838100/36 "2019-08-06T00:22:09Z")

</div>

> [@WillFarnaby](#):
>
> The New Testament provided guidance led to the development of western civilization. These concepts wouldn’t have been conceivable absent the existence of Christianity.

Thanks, I really needed a good laugh.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Max\_S](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/46a35a/32.png) [@Max\_S](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Max_S)\
**Post date:** [August 6, 2019, 7:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-seven-tenets-of-the-satanic-temple-compared-to-other-religious-guidance/838100/37 "2019-08-06T07:35:36Z")

</div>

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> I posit that these tenets are far superior to the moral guidance provided in the Ten Commandments or the New Testament of the Bible. I’m not nearly as familiar with the Quran, but in my limited understanding they’re also superior to the guidance of that text.
> 
> Morality being a human construct, this is, of course, just my opinion. But if you disagree, why do you believe your preferred set of religious guidance is superior to these seven tenets? What proper moral behavior do you believe is not covered by these seven?

**Voyager** and I noted this in the religion thread, but your usage of “superior” assumes the conclusion. Satanism is morally superior to you because it covers all of the morals; but this presupposes that the Divine command theory is false or that God does not exist. You are assuming that there is a single static set of morals or universal truths when there may be none, or they may be based on the whims or nature of a God.

~Max

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [August 6, 2019, 12:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-seven-tenets-of-the-satanic-temple-compared-to-other-religious-guidance/838100/38 "2019-08-06T12:03:54Z")

</div>

> [@Max\_S](#):
>
> **Voyager** and I noted this in the religion thread, but your usage of “superior” assumes the conclusion. Satanism is morally superior to you because it covers all of the morals; but this presupposes that the Divine command theory is false or that God does not exist. You are assuming that there is a single static set of morals or universal truths when there may be none, or they may be based on the whims or nature of a God.
> 
> ~Max

I’m not assuming anything – these are just my opinions. I think these are superior, based on my own beliefs and choices about morality. If you disagree, what is the basis for your disagreement?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![QuickSilver](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/quicksilver/32/7832_2.png) [@QuickSilver](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/QuickSilver)\
**Post date:** [August 6, 2019, 12:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-seven-tenets-of-the-satanic-temple-compared-to-other-religious-guidance/838100/39 "2019-08-06T12:06:55Z")

</div>

> [@Max\_S](#):
>
> **Voyager** and I noted this in the religion thread, but your usage of “superior” assumes the conclusion. Satanism is morally superior to you because it covers all of the morals; but this presupposes that the Divine command theory is false or that God does not exist. You are assuming that there is a single static set of morals or universal truths when there may be none, or they may be based on the whims or nature of a God.
> 
> ~Max

Much as with the case of a teapot orbiting Saturn, it is reasonable, in fact entirely rational, to presume the non-existence of god and divine command unless and until it is shown otherwise. So while some may choose to embrace moral ambiguity as an illustration of skill in rhetorical pedantry, others pick a side that seems sensible and just, and roll with it until it is proven to be otherwise. YMMV.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [August 6, 2019, 1:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-seven-tenets-of-the-satanic-temple-compared-to-other-religious-guidance/838100/40 "2019-08-06T13:13:39Z")

</div>

> [@QuickSilver](#):
>
> Much as with the case of a teapot orbiting Saturn, it is reasonable, in fact entirely rational, to presume the non-existence of god and divine command unless and until it is shown otherwise. So while some may choose to embrace moral ambiguity as an illustration of skill in rhetorical pedantry, others pick a side that seems sensible and just, and roll with it until it is proven to be otherwise. YMMV.

There isn’t any difference between assuming divine command as sensible and just until proven otherwise, and assuming Satanism (or anything else) as sensible and just until proven otherwise.

So, Nobody’s MVs.

Regards,  
Shodan

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-seven-tenets-of-the-satanic-temple-compared-to-other-religious-guidance/838100.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-seven-tenets-of-the-satanic-temple-compared-to-other-religious-guidance/838100.md?page=3)
