# The Spin of the Sun

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-spin-of-the-sun/939887>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [April 13, 2021, 3:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-spin-of-the-sun/939887 "2021-04-13T03:01:07Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jackknifed\_Juggernaut](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/9de053/32.png) [@Jackknifed\_Juggernaut](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jackknifed_Juggernaut)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2021, 3:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-spin-of-the-sun/939887/1 "2021-04-13T03:01:07Z")

</div>

I just learned that the sun spins. And since it’s all plasma, the parts of the sun near its equator spin 3 times as fast as the parts near its poles.

Question: does the sun spin on a similar plane as the plane of the planets’ revolution around it? Does it spin along the same plane as its own revolution around the center of the galaxy?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![markn\_1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f9ae1b/32.png) [@markn\_1](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/markn_1)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2021, 3:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-spin-of-the-sun/939887/2 "2021-04-13T03:27:19Z")

</div>

The sun’s rotational axis is tilted about 7 degrees from being perpendicular to the Earth’s orbital plane. Also, the sun’s equator rotates once in about 25 days while the area near the poles rotates once every 35 days, so nowhere near 3 times as fast.

> **[Solar Rotation Varies by Latitude](https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/sunearth/science/solar-rotation.html)**
>
> The Sun rotates on its axis once in about 27 days. This rotation was first detected by observing the motion of sunspots.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![penultima\_thule](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/penultima_thule/32/3833_2.png) [@penultima\_thule](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/penultima_thule)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2021, 3:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-spin-of-the-sun/939887/3 "2021-04-13T03:40:35Z")

</div>

> [@Jackknifed\_Juggernaut](#):
>
> I just learned that the sun spins

Is that an indication that all/most stars are in a rotation?  
If so I presume some would spin more violently than others?  
Could those stars in dual systems have more complex movements eg oscillation?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Northern\_Piper](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/northern_piper/32/5304_2.png) [@Northern\_Piper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Northern_Piper)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2021, 3:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-spin-of-the-sun/939887/4 "2021-04-13T03:43:57Z")

</div>

Pulsars certainly spin.

> **[Pulsar](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulsar)**
>
> Pages for logged out editors learn more
> 
> A pulsar (from pulsating radio source) is a highly magnetized rotating neutron star that emits beams of electromagnetic radiation out of its magnetic poles. This radiation can be observed only when a beam of emission is pointing toward Earth (similar to the way a lighthouse can be seen only when the light is pointed in the direction of an observer), and is responsible for the pulsed appearance of emission. Neutron stars are very dense and have sho...

My understanding is that all stars spin, because it’s part of the conservation of angular momentum from their formation out of dust clouds. I’m open to correction on that. Paging @Chronos !

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pmwgreen](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/edb3f5/32.png) [@pmwgreen](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pmwgreen)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2021, 3:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-spin-of-the-sun/939887/5 "2021-04-13T03:56:36Z")

</div>

Just to clarify it is the core of the sun that spins 4x faster. A week vs a month or so on the outer surface.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Darren\_Garrison](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/darren_garrison/32/92_2.png) [@Darren\_Garrison](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Darren_Garrison)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2021, 4:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-spin-of-the-sun/939887/6 "2021-04-13T04:03:55Z")

</div>

> [@penultima\_thule](#):
>
> Is that an indication that all/most stars are in a rotation?

Yes. It is pretty much impossible for them _not_ to be spinning. In theory a gas cloud could collapse perfectly symmetricaly from all directions at once, but it very profoundly unlikely.

> **[Stellar rotation](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_rotation)**
>
> Stellar rotation is the angular motion of a star about its axis. The rate of rotation can be measured from the spectrum of the star, or by timing the movements of active features on the surface.
> The rotation of a star produces an equatorial bulge due to centrifugal force. As stars are not solid bodies, they can also undergo differential rotation. Thus the equator of the star can rotate at a different angular velocity than the higher latitudes. These differences in the rate of rotation within a s...

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Darren\_Garrison](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/darren_garrison/32/92_2.png) [@Darren\_Garrison](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Darren_Garrison)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2021, 4:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-spin-of-the-sun/939887/7 "2021-04-13T04:07:19Z")

</div>

(And, as an aside, that freak spinless star would not have planets. Or enen a circumstellar disc.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jackknifed\_Juggernaut](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/9de053/32.png) [@Jackknifed\_Juggernaut](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jackknifed_Juggernaut)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2021, 4:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-spin-of-the-sun/939887/8 "2021-04-13T04:12:33Z")

</div>

> [@markn\_1](#):
>
> so nowhere near 3 times as fast.

Thanks. Not sure where I got the 3 times from.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ASL\_v2.0](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/asl_v2.0/32/3525_2.png) [@ASL\_v2.0](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ASL_v2.0)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2021, 5:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-spin-of-the-sun/939887/9 "2021-04-13T05:12:02Z")

</div>

Depends on what is meant by “3 times as fast.” Angular velocity (in terms of number of rotations per period of time) apparently not. But keep in mind that a lap around the equator will be much wider (in terms of diameter) than a lap near the pole. So maybe that comes out to three times faster in terms of lateral velocity at any given moment?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DPRK](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/4491bb/32.png) [@DPRK](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DPRK)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2021, 2:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-spin-of-the-sun/939887/10 "2021-04-13T14:06:31Z")

</div>

If a body, let us say a spheroid, is spinning, then a point on the axis is, to a certain approximation, not moving at all, is it? Much less 3 times as slow as some point on the equator.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Napier](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/ce73a5/32.png) [@Napier](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Napier)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2021, 2:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-spin-of-the-sun/939887/11 "2021-04-13T14:12:09Z")

</div>

Because stars have to conserve angular momentum even if they collapse and become much smaller in diameter, neutron stars often spin quite rapidly even though they are the size of cities. They’re called pulsars if they beam energy rhythmically in doing so (because of their magnetic fields). The fastest one spins 42,960 RPM, faster than a Dremel tool:

Pulsar [PSR J1748-2446ad](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PSR_J1748-2446ad), discovered in 2004, is, as of 2021, the fastest-spinning pulsar currently known, spinning 716 times per second.

That’s from the Wikipedia article on millisecond pulsars.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![markn\_1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f9ae1b/32.png) [@markn\_1](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/markn_1)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2021, 3:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-spin-of-the-sun/939887/12 "2021-04-13T15:46:16Z")

</div>

> [@ASL\_v2.0](#):
>
> But keep in mind that a lap around the equator will be much wider (in terms of diameter) than a lap near the pole. So maybe that comes out to three times faster in terms of lateral velocity at any given moment?

That seems a fairly useless point however. By that reasoning, every rotating solid sphere, like the Earth or a spinning basketball, also has points on the equator that are moving 3 times faster, 4 times faster, and for that matter 1000 times faster than points near the pole. It says nothing about the more interesting fact that the sun’s angular velocity varies with latitude, unlike a solid sphere.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Munch](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/munch/32/5281_2.png) [@Munch](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Munch)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2021, 3:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-spin-of-the-sun/939887/13 "2021-04-13T15:57:26Z")

</div>

> [@Darren\_Garrison](#):
>
> (And, as an aside, that freak spinless star would not have planets. Or enen a circumstellar disc.)

Is that because of the lack of an accretion disk? But that star would be capable of capturing a rogue planet though, right?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TheGunIsMightierThanThePen](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thegunismightierthanthepen/32/2981_2.png) [@TheGunIsMightierThanThePen](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TheGunIsMightierThanThePen)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2021, 4:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-spin-of-the-sun/939887/14 "2021-04-13T16:01:11Z")

</div>

> [@Munch](#):
>
> Is that because of the lack of an accretion disk?

Yep.

> [@Munch](#):
>
> But that star would be capable of capturing a rogue planet though, right?

It could, but then the star wouldn’t be spinless anymore as gravitational tidal-dragging takes effect (no matter how small the planet). Speaking of which, since gravity operates over infinite distances, technically any star that is not alone in its own observable universe will be subject to a miniscule amount of tidal dragging from other things with mass.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2021, 8:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-spin-of-the-sun/939887/15 "2021-04-13T20:33:06Z")

</div>

A star that didn’t already have planets also couldn’t capture any, unless you had some truly freak circumstance with multiple rogue planets passing by at once.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![naita](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/naita/32/5862_2.png) [@naita](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/naita)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2021, 8:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-spin-of-the-sun/939887/16 "2021-04-13T20:37:57Z")

</div>

> [@Napier](#):
>
> They’re called pulsars if they beam energy rhythmically in doing so (because of their magnetic fields).

For anyone who might get tricked by this description. Pulsars emit a steady stream, but not completely aligned with the axis of rotation, so if we’re in part of the “beam cone” we get the radiation in pulses.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![YamatoTwinkie](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/y/cc9497/32.png) [@YamatoTwinkie](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/YamatoTwinkie)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2021, 8:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-spin-of-the-sun/939887/17 "2021-04-13T20:39:19Z")

</div>

> [@markn\_1](#):
>
> The sun’s rotational axis is tilted about 7 degrees from being perpendicular to the Earth’s orbital plane.

Are there good explanations for this discrepancy?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Napier](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/ce73a5/32.png) [@Napier](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Napier)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2021, 9:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-spin-of-the-sun/939887/18 "2021-04-13T21:02:20Z")

</div>

> [@naita](#):
>
> Pulsars emit a steady stream

Thanks, good correction. They don’t beam it rhythmically, except to a specific limited size target (like us).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Grey](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/b782af/32.png) [@Grey](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Grey)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2021, 9:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-spin-of-the-sun/939887/19 "2021-04-13T21:05:18Z")

</div>

> [@YamatoTwinkie](#):
>
> Are there good explanations for this discrepancy?

What makes you think the Earth’s orbital plane is the one that should be the reference. 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![YamatoTwinkie](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/y/cc9497/32.png) [@YamatoTwinkie](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/YamatoTwinkie)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2021, 9:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-spin-of-the-sun/939887/20 "2021-04-13T21:22:23Z")

</div>

Well, not Earth’s orbital plane in particular, but you’d _think_ that the average orbital plane of the solar system and the sun’s tilt would be aligned, absent any major event that disturbed them since initial formation.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-spin-of-the-sun/939887.md?page=2)
