# The Supreme Court isn't done: Watch and see a lot of individual rights fall

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-supreme-court-isnt-done-watch-and-see-a-lot-of-individual-rights-fall/966843>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Tags:** roe\_vs\_wade\_abortion\
**Created:** [June 25, 2022, 3:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-supreme-court-isnt-done-watch-and-see-a-lot-of-individual-rights-fall/966843 "2022-06-25T15:08:10Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 187

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kimstu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/ecd19e/32.png) [@Kimstu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kimstu)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2022, 1:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-supreme-court-isnt-done-watch-and-see-a-lot-of-individual-rights-fall/966843/187 "2022-07-03T01:38:48Z")

</div>

> [@D\_Anconia](#):
>
> No, I’m not saying it was the correct decision

Why not? Obviously, it was constitutional because that was the way the Court ruled, right? Anybody between 1973 and 2022 who said that pregnant people didn’t have a constitutional right to an abortion was making a non-factual claim, right?

So how could the decision be “incorrect”? Or, if the Roe decision was incorrect, then why can’t the Kennedy v. Bremerton decision be incorrect?

See, this is the sort of semantic tangle you end up in when you try to restrict the concept of “constitutionality” to mean only “consistency with most recent rulings of Supreme Court”.

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-supreme-court-isnt-done-watch-and-see-a-lot-of-individual-rights-fall/966843)._